VAVEL.com

If you have watched Tottenham over the last few seasons, this news probably feels inevitable.

Pedro Porro has become one of the most important players in the squad, and Spurs have now made sure he will remain in North London for years to come.

The club confirmed on Monday that the Spanish defender has signed a new contract until June 2031, with the option of an extra year that could keep him at Tottenham until 2032.

For supporters, it is exactly the sort of news they wanted to see at the start of the summer. Porro arrived from Sporting CP in January 2023 with plenty of excitement around him, but even then few would have expected him to become such a key figure so quickly.

Over the last three and a half years, he has developed into one of the first names on the teamsheet. Whether Tottenham needs a goal, a moment of quality or simply someone willing to keep pushing the team forward, Porro usually finds a way to make an impact.

After signing the new deal, the Spaniard kept his message simple.

"Hi Spurs fans. I'm so happy to sign a new contract. Can't wait to see you next season. Come on you Spurs!"

Reward for one of Tottenham's most important players

That excitement is shared by plenty of people around the club.

Last season was another reminder of how important he has become. Porro made 47 appearances and proved to be an absolute rock, playing the most minutes in the squad to help navigate a challenging campaign.

His numbers since joining the club tell the same story. In 152 appearances, he has scored 13 goals and provided 26 assists. Those are impressive figures for any defender and help explain why supporters have taken such a liking to him.

Sporting director Johan Lange praised the progress Porro has made since arriving and spoke about the influence he has had both on and off the pitch. The club clearly sees him as a player who can help lead the next stage of the project.

Head coach Roberto De Zerbi was equally complimentary, describing him as a player whose energy, intelligence and mentality make a difference every week.

Spurs move quickly amid outside interest

The extension also arrives at an important time.

Reports linking Porro with clubs such as Real Madrid and Manchester City have become increasingly common over recent months. When players perform as consistently as he has, attention from elsewhere is unavoidable.

Instead of allowing those rumours to grow, Tottenham have moved quickly and secured the future of one of their biggest assets. More than anything, this feels like a reward for a player who has steadily improved every season since arriving at the club.

Tottenham supporters have watched him grow from an exciting signing into one of the leaders of the team. Now they know he will be sticking around for a while longer.

And judging by the reaction from fans, that is a decision everyone seems pretty happy with.

A season that, upon its conclusion, brought an overwhelming feeling of relief. Now this was not the glory-tinged relief that Spurs had last season, where they ended a 17 year wait for silverware. It was a relief of an alien kind, with the club having avoided relegation from the Premier League on the final day of the season.

The campaign began with substantial change. Thomas Frank took over from Ange Postecoglou on the touchline, while in the boardroom, Executive Chairman Daniel Levy was relieved of his duties after 25 years.

On the pitch, it started with a UEFA Super Cup loss on penalties to PSG. Games thereafter were okay enough points-wise, but performances had precious little vitality.

The Dane was in charge until February 2026 oversaw continuously tepid displays and, soon enough, worsening results.

Rather than competing on all fronts, as was his appointment's intention, he left the Lilywhites in February, five points above the bottom three and out of both domestic cup competitions early.Embed from Getty Images

Ex-Juventus hardman Igor Tudor was tasked with course correcting a weary squad to the end of the season, but ended up making the situation worse as relegation threatened West Ham and Nottingham Forest gathered momentum.

Tudor’s era was cut short after just seven games. For reasons only explainable as it being Tottenham Hotspur, his only point in Premier League was earned away at Anfield and his only victory was the Champions League return tie against Atletico Madrid.

The highly-rated and controversial Roberto De Zerbi then took on the task of dragging Spurs out of the unthinkable.

Almost through sheer force of will, the Italian did manage to resurrect fortunes enough to keep Tottenham in the top flight, finishing just two clear of the Hammers on 41 points.

Embed from Getty Images

The only bright spot for Spurs this season was that the ignominy could have been far worse. Relegation to the Championship as the world’s ninth richest club would have been catastrophic from a financial and spiritual perspective.

There is no smoke without fire, and Tottenham fans will hope that their 2025/26 campaign acts as a reckoning for the hierarchy to ensure they never bear witness to such a season again.

To recap in as rosy a way as we can, VAVEL’s Tottenham writers have selected six awards to highlight the better performers and moments during a dismal year in North London.

Player of the Season - Joao Palhinha

When João Palhinha arrived at Tottenham Hotspur on loan from Bayern Munich, there was plenty of excitement around the move. Spurs had been looking for a midfielder who could bring some much-needed steel to the team, and by the end of the season Palhinha had become one of the first names on the team sheet.

Tottenham endured a difficult and often frustrating campaign, with defensive problems and inconsistent performances making life difficult throughout the year. However, one player consistently stood out whenever the team needed someone to steady the ship.

It did not take long for Palhinha to become one of Tottenham's most important players. His ability to win tackles, break up opposition attacks and protect the defence gave the team a level of security that had been missing for some time.

Embed from Getty Images

While his main job was doing the dirty work in midfield, he also delivered in crucial moments. A dramatic stoppage-time equaliser against Wolves and an important winner against Everton showed he could contribute at the other end of the pitch when it mattered most.

Across 39 appearances in all competitions, the Portuguese midfielder was one of the few players who consistently performed at a high level. His leadership, commitment and relentless work rate made him a favourite among the Tottenham faithful.

In a season that often tested Tottenham, Palhinha was the player supporters could always count on. For that reason, there is no doubt that he deserves the Player of the Season award.

Words by Dhruv Kapoor

Young Player of the Season - Archie Gray

Blooding in young players to the first team environment can usually take time. Physically they are still developing, mentally the spotlight could be daunting.

Archie Gray’s Tottenham career has not been that smooth, orderly transition. However, the England international has continuously displayed the kind of fortitude and level-headedness associated with senior footballers.

After playing majority of 2024/25 as a makeshift centre-back, Gray was afforded more opportunities in his more favoured midfield position, but was still required to fill in as and when.

Embed from Getty Images

This campaign did not end with a trophy like his first, but there were some silver linings.

His first senior goal against Crystal Palace earned a vital three points in a 1-0 win. It was followed by his first home goal against Newcastle in Frank’s final outing as Spurs manager.

Towards the tail end, De Zerbi chose to lineup with more experienced options. Nevertheless, Gray’s courage amid a tumultuous few seasons at the club has always shone through and has given him the resilience and platform to become a cornerstone of Spurs squads to come.

Words by Brandon Williams

Signing of the Season - Mohammed Kudus

Signed for £55 million from London and eventually relegation rivals West Ham, Kudus immediately became a beacon on the right flank for Tottenham.

So intrinsic was he to Thomas Frank’s plans that the Ghanaian was often the sole avenue for keeping the ball in the final third and generating chances, resulting in three goals, five assists and 23 chances created.

Although Spurs’ struggles ran much deeper and form had already started to slip, Kudus’ injury at the turn of the calendar year was the tipping point for Frank’s tenure.

Embed from Getty Images

Remarkably, Kudus completed 51 take ons this season - the fifth highest in the Premier League this season, despite the fact he played only 19 matches while every other player in the top ten had a minimum of 30 outings. It puts him level with Rayan Cherki and above the likes of Morgan Rogers and Bukayo Saka.

The 25-year-old has already shown what a smart piece of business his acquisition could be for the future. If he can perform well for the Lilywhites in their most desperately sluggish state, then a better unit around him will likely see him find greater heights.

Words by Brandon Williams

Most improved player - Mathys Tel

The first six months of Mathys Tel’s season were non-existent. He struggled for minutes under Thomas Frank and was left out of the UEFA Champions League squad. In January, the rumour mill was swinging and there was a chance that the Frenchman may have left the club.

But there was no denying there was glimpses of hope, and those glimpses were seen at the end of the season, as Tel became a key player under Roberto De Zerbi, and used the lack of available wingers to his advantage, with Wilson Odobert, Dejan Kulusevski, Mohammed Kudus and Xavi Simons all out injured.

In November, Tel scored against Manchester United off the bench, but despite showing promise, he didn’t start a game until January after that strike against the Red Devils. Against Bournemouth in early 2026, in what was his second start in a row, the winger scored as Spurs lost 3-2.

Despite his cameos of good moments, Frank was persistent in using other options instead of Tel, and even shoehorned Lucas Bergvall into a winger position instead of accommodating the former Bayern Munich man.

It was under De Zerbi where Tel got his first regular, consistent minutes as part of the starting XI. He was a driving factor in Spurs’ survival and looked the only dangerous threat going forward for large parts of the campaign.

Embed from Getty Images

His assist at Villa Park and stunning strike against Leeds United were vital in surviving relegation and the truth be told, without those, Spurs would have gone down.

Under De Zerbi’s guidance, and with regular minutes, there is no reason why Tel cannot explode under the Italian. He has had a promising campaign with limited minutes to show for it, but one thing that is for certain, he has not disappointed when called upon.

Words by Harrison Nathan

Surprise Package - Antonin Kinsky

Antonin Kinsky was not a newcomer this season. He already had twelve Spurs appearances under his belt by the time he took to the field against Atletico Madrid, replacing a Guglielmo Vicario in patchy form.

A disastrous 17-minutes saw him make two errors that led to goals, with Igor Tudor opting to substitute him without so much as a glance of sympathy in his direction as he walked off.

You would be forgiven for thinking the Czech’s Tottenham career ended then and there, but Vicario’s later injury problems saw him reinstated to the team under De Zerbi.

What transpired was one of the most remarkable individual stories of the Premier League season.

Embed from Getty Images

The 23-year-old made a string of excellent performances, notably making eye-catching stops against Wolves and Leeds United and ultimately playing a crucial role in literally saving Spurs from the drop.

His touch to keep out Sean Longstaff in the latter fixtures in particular going down as one of the finest pieces of goalkeeping in the Premier League season.

Moreover, Kinsky performed well when playing out from the back under De Zerbi’s new remit. Doubly admirable given that was what caused him problems in Madrid.

"Yeah, I would say I'm stronger by that one experience," he told Sky Sports about his redemption. "There is always so much things to improve, so it just shows you the things that you can get better at or mentally to adjust a little bit the approach towards the game."

Words by Brandon Williams

Match of the Season - Aston Villa 1-2 Tottenham, May 2026

The win at Molineux eight days prior was a relief for Tottenham – their first win in the Premier League in the entirety of 2026 was a huge weight off the players’ shoulders. However, things were not going to get any easier as they continued to fight relegation.

Handed an extra life by West Ham losing 3-0 at Brentford the day before, they travelled to Villa Park to face the UEFA Europa League semi-finalists, Aston Villa, in a crunch tie. An additional advantage that Spurs were given was the fact that Unai Emery heavily rotated.

And they used it to its fullest, as they picked up a resounding victory that would change the trajectory of their season.

Embed from Getty Images

It instilled a belief for the first time that they would get out of the mess at the foot of the Premier League table, and for the first time in what felt like an eternity, there was light at the end of the tunnel for Roberto De Zerbi’s men.

Eventual Player of the Match winner Conor Gallagher handed the Lilywhites an early lead as he rifled a half-volley into the bottom corner, and it was a coming-of-age performance from the Englishman, who, for the first time since his January move from Atletico Madrid, showed glimpses of his old self that many raved about when he was at Chelsea.

Richarlison, who played a major role in Premier League with eleven goals throughout the campaign, doubled the lead in the first half, as the 3,000+ travelling Tottenham fans were sent into pandemonium tucked into the corner of the stands in the Midlands.

Spurs never looked uncomfortable on that special Sunday night in Birmingham, and, despite Emi Buendia’s stoppage time header, nothing could spoil the party in the away end as the fans began to believe their season would be saved, and torture of the Championship would be avoided.

Words by Harrison Nathan

Tottenham Hotspur are close to completing the signing of Andy Robertson on a free transfer, with the Liverpool left-back expected to join once his contract expires this summer.

There is news that the Scotland captain has reportedly agreed terms over a move to North London, after turning down late interest from Juventus to stay in the Premier League. Nothing is officially signed yet, but all signs point towards Robertson becoming one of Tottenham’s first major arrivals of the window.

It is also a move that says a lot about where the Spurs are right now. This is not a team aiming to compete for the top four anymore. They are rebuilding after finishing 17th in the Premier League after a deeply disappointing season, with Roberto De Zerbi now responsible for fixing both the squad and the mindset.

A signing that comes from clear need

This is not one of those surprise opportunistic deals. Tottenham have been actively reshaping their squad this summer and have been keeping an eye on Robertson for a while.

In fact, they already tried to bring him in during the January window, but they failed because Liverpool did not want to let him go at that moment. But after a few months, the situation has completely changed.

Spurs need experience. They need players who have actually been through pressure situations and know how to deal with them. That has been missing in this squad, especially in defensive areas.

Left-back has been a problem position. Destiny Udogie has shown real quality at times, especially when moving into midfield to help Spurs control the ball. But injuries have broken his rhythm, and over the season Spurs have not had a reliable option there.

That is where Robertson comes in.

Why Robertson still matters, even at 32

At Liverpool this season, Robertson’s role has clearly changed. He is not an automatic starter anymore.

With Milos Kerkez arriving and taking more responsibility, Robertson ended up playing more of a rotation role, finishing the season with limited Premier League minutes. It was the first real sign that Liverpool were moving towards a new cycle.

But even with reduced minutes, he still looks like a player who can contribute at the top level. Just not every three days anymore.

What stands out more now is not his explosive running or constant overlap numbers from his peak years, but his experience and decision-making. He knows when to go, when to hold, and how to manage big moments in matches.

That is something Spurs have lacked, especially when games start to get messy.

There is also the leadership factor. Robertson is Scotland captain, has played in Champions League finals, won league titles, and spent nearly a decade in one of the most intense systems in European football. That kind of background does not disappear even if the legs slow slightly.

How he fits into De Zerbi’s system

Roberto De Zerbi’s system at Tottenham is expected to be quite flexible, often shifting between a 4-2-3-1 and a more structured 3-2-5 shape when Spurs have the ball.

In simple terms, full-backs are not just defenders. They are key attacking outlets and also important in how Spurs build play from the back.

Robertson fits that in a slightly different way compared to Udogie.

Udogie tends to drift inside into midfield areas, almost acting like an extra midfielder at times. He helps Spurs play through pressure centrally.

Robertson is different. He is more direct. He stays wide, pushes high, and looks to deliver crosses quickly once he gets into attacking positions.

That difference actually gives Spurs something they have been missing. When teams sit deep against them, Spurs sometimes struggle to stretch the pitch properly. Robertson’s natural instinct to stay wide and whip in early crosses gives them another way of attacking compact defences.

It is simple, but it is effective.

Pressing, energy, and what still holds up

One thing Robertson definitely still has is intensity.

He spent years under Jurgen Klopp in a system that demanded constant pressing, constant running, and constant awareness in transition moments. That experience fits quite neatly with what De Zerbi wants, even if the structure is slightly different.

Spurs under De Zerbi are expected to press high and aggressively, especially in wide areas. Robertson is comfortable stepping up the pitch, engaging wingers early, and squeezing space.

The main question now is not about his understanding of the role, but about physical consistency. At 32, he is not going to cover the same ground he once did every single game.

That is why this move looks more like rotation planning than a guaranteed starting role.

Sharing responsibility with Udogie

This is probably the most practical part of the signing.

Tottenham cannot rely on Udogie to play every game, especially with his injury record this season. That is just not realistic in a long campaign.

Robertson gives them a different option without a major drop in quality. He is experienced enough to step in immediately, but also adaptable enough to share minutes depending on the opponent.

It also gives De Zerbi flexibility. Some games might need Udogie’s inverted midfield movement. Others might need Robertson’s width and crossing. Having both allows Spurs to adjust without changing the entire system.

A sensible move in a rebuilding phase

This is not a signing that screams long-term planning, and it probably was not meant to.

It feels more like a practical decision for where Tottenham are right now. A team coming off a poor season, trying to stabilise, and bring in players who understand what top-level football actually demands.

Robertson is not arriving as a superstar signing. He is arriving as someone who knows the league, knows the pressure, and still has enough quality to make a difference.

And for Spurs at this stage, that might be exactly the point.

Tottenham are close to agreeing a deal with Argentine centre-back Marcos Senesi following his departure from Bournemouth.

The 29-year-old announced his departure before the Cherries' 1-1 draw with Manchester City at the Vitality, which ensured European qualification for the first time in their history.

Personal terms for the three-time Argentina international are yet to be finalised with Spurs, but the deal is advancing.

Why did Senesi leave Bournemouth?

The defender turned down a third contract offer from Bournemouth in December and began talks with clubs overseas.

Senesi, who featured in all but one league game this season, now looks set to stay in the Premier League despite previous interest from Barcelona and Atletico Madrid.

Liverpool and Manchester United also expressed interest in the defender earlier this month.

The centre back, who helped Bournemouth finish a club-best sixth in the top flight, made 128 appearances over his four-year spell in Dorset, having joined the club from Feyenoord in 2022.

He could feature for Argentina at the World Cup this summer having been included in Lionel Scaloni's provisional squad, with the final squad set to be announced on Saturday.

Bournemouth's search for a replacement

Bournemouth, who will be managed by Marco Rose next season, are actively looking for a Senesi replacement this summer.

As per reports, Sporting's Ousmane Diomande has been identified as a potential replacement for Senesi, with several top clubs interested in the defender.

Tottenham's summer business

Spurs secured survival on the final day of the season by beating Everton 1-0 at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, finishing 17th for the second consecutive season.

Roberto De Zerbi's side are also set to sign Scottish left-back Andrew Robertson following his exit from Liverpool.

Details remain to be finalised on the deal with Tottenham, but an agreement is in place in principle.

Roberto De Zerbi was a much relieved man after his side narrowly escaped relegation following a 1-0 victory over Everton.

Tottenham came into the game needing at least a draw to stay in England's top-flight, however, a first half opener from João Palhinha, followed by a brilliant stoppage time save from Antonin Kinsky was enough to secure all three points.

"I'm happy, I enjoyed today, the beginning of the day until now.

"Football is nice because if you give your best, maybe today, maybe tomorrow, after tomorrow, you receive back everything from football. It's incredible.

"My players played a fantastic game, as a spirit, as a behaviour, as an attitude, but also as a quality of the play, especially in the first half, they played very well and I'm proud.

"We deserve this day. We deserve this game. We deserve this win. We deserve everything of today. I think we deserve to stay up, because we made 11 points in seven games and we deserved more."

Focus shifts to building a 'new' team

De Zerbi also made it clear that his new target is to begin next season with his "dream" team so that Tottenham can avoid a similar situation.

He said: "From tonight we have to start to organise and to build a new team. I don't think we have not to change too many players.

"We have 10, 11, 12 players good enough to stay, good enough, like players, like people. Then we have to complete the squad with the first level of players. The first level of players, because we suffered too much.

"I suffered a lot, but I think the fans, the club, the board, the players, they suffered too much. We are Tottenham and we can't suffer like this until the last second of the last game to stay up.

"I will be stronger. I don't want to decide alone because football is a group - sporting director, scouting, CEO - but my target now is finished, to stay up.

"My target is to start the pre-season with the team I have in my dream, my head."

For long stretches of Tuesday night, this did not feel like a normal London derby. It felt like two footballing ideologies trying to emotionally survive themselves.

Chelsea FC entered Stamford Bridge needing a result to keep their European ambitions alive. Tottenham Hotspur arrived carrying something far heavier: fear.

Fear of relegation. Fear of collapse. Fear of a season spiraling into humiliation.

That difference ultimately decided everything.

Chelsea controlled the spaces Tottenham wanted to use

Roberto De Zerbi’s Tottenham attempted to build through his trademark risk-heavy positional framework. Spurs lined up in a fluid 4-2-3-1 but constantly morphed into a deep 4-2-2-2 structure during buildup, baiting Chelsea’s press deep inside their own half.

The idea was simple in theory.

Invite pressure centrally, drag Chelsea’s midfield forward, then exploit the vertical gaps left behind through rapid third-man combinations into the wide areas.

But Enzo Maresca prepared for exactly that.

Chelsea did not obsess over dominating possession. Instead, they dominated territory and passing lanes. Their 3-2-2-3 buildup shape created overwhelming numerical superiority in central midfield, with Moisés Caicedo anchoring the base while Enzo Fernández pushed aggressively into the left inside channel.

That created a constant four-versus-two scenario against Tottenham’s double pivot of Rodrigo Bentancur and Pape Matar Sarr.

Spurs were not just outnumbered. They were structurally trapped.

Chelsea’s press worked almost passively at first. Tottenham’s centre-backs were allowed to circulate possession harmlessly across the back line, but the second a vertical pass entered midfield, Chelsea exploded into aggressive pressure.

Caicedo, Cole Palmer, and Enzo Fernández locked onto Tottenham’s central options with ruthless precision.

The effect was devastating.

Instead of manipulating Chelsea’s press, Tottenham repeatedly accelerated directly into it.

Enzo Fernández punished Tottenham’s emotional impatience

Chelsea’s opener in the 18th minute did more than give the hosts the lead. It psychologically distorted Tottenham’s entire tactical structure.

Fernández’s stunning long-range strike forced Spurs into emotional football far earlier than De Zerbi would have wanted.

Before the goal, Tottenham still attempted patient buildup patterns despite Chelsea’s pressure. After it, their circulation became visibly frantic. Vertical passes were rushed. Distances between midfield and defence stretched dramatically. The calm positional manipulation De Zerbi demands disappeared under the emotional weight of the occasion.

Chelsea immediately sensed it.

Rather than pushing recklessly for a second goal, Maresca’s side doubled down on controlling central access points. Palmer drifted intelligently between Tottenham’s midfield and defensive lines, while Pedro Neto and Alejandro Garnacho maintained maximum width to isolate Spurs’ fullbacks.

Chelsea were not dominating through endless possession sequences. They were dominating through spatial suffocation.

Tottenham’s midfield simply stopped functioning as a connector between defence and attack.

Chelsea’s second goal explained Tottenham’s entire night

The second goal in the 67th minute was not just a defensive mistake. It was Tottenham’s tactical identity collapsing in real time.

Andrey Santos’ finish arrived from a Pedro Neto cross, but the real story was the structural chaos that created the move in the first place.

Tottenham’s aggressive buildup principles had already begun physically collapsing by the hour mark. The distances between their defensive line and midfield were becoming enormous, sometimes stretching beyond 30 yards. Their press lost synchronization. Their recovery runs slowed. Their compactness vanished.

Chelsea immediately attacked those gaps.

As Neto received possession wide, Tottenham’s defensive shape completely lost balance. One defender stepped toward the ball, another retreated toward the six-yard box, while the midfield failed to recover into the central corridor.

The result looked almost comedic from a structural perspective.

Santos arrived into the penalty area virtually untracked because Tottenham had overloaded their own defensive attention toward the wide delivery. Chelsea manipulated Spurs’ panic perfectly.

It was the football equivalent of everybody trying to fix the same problem simultaneously while creating three new ones.

So the answer to how Chelsea’s second goal happened, the answer is brutally simple:

Tottenham became so obsessed with surviving the immediate danger that they forgot to defend the actual scoring zone.

That sequence summarized the entire match.

Tottenham abandoned control and embraced chaos

Ironically, Tottenham looked most dangerous once they completely abandoned their original tactical plan.

After Chelsea’s second goal, Tottenham abandoned controlled buildup and shifted toward direct transition football and early wide deliveries.

Long balls replaced patient circulation. Wide crosses replaced controlled progression. The midfield was largely bypassed entirely.

It should not have worked.

Yet Chelsea briefly lost emotional control after Richarlison’s 73rd-minute goal, which arrived following a sharp combination involving Pape Matar Sarr.

Suddenly Stamford Bridge became nervous.

Chelsea dropped deeper. Their defensive line retreated. Palmer abandoned his advanced playmaking role to help stabilize midfield possession, while late substitutions from Maresca sacrificed pressing aggression for defensive security.

The final stages descended into pure emotional warfare.

Tottenham threw numbers into the penalty area with little positional restraint. Micky van de Ven stepped aggressively into midfield zones to launch aerial deliveries, while Chelsea accumulated yellow cards attempting to disrupt the rhythm of the game through tactical fouls and physical interruptions.

For the final ten minutes, structure disappeared entirely.

This became survival football.

Chelsea won the midfield war before they won the match

The clearest tactical truth from Stamford Bridge was Chelsea’s complete superiority in central areas.

Their midfield structure consistently overwhelmed Tottenham numerically and positionally, with Caicedo anchoring Chelsea’s buildup while Fernández and Palmer manipulated the spaces between Tottenham’s midfield and defensive line.

Spurs simply never solved the overload problem.

Bentancur and Sarr were forced into impossible defensive coverage responsibilities, constantly shifting horizontally to close passing lanes while simultaneously trying to support buildup progression.

The physical exhaustion eventually became visible.

Chelsea’s control did not come from endless possession dominance. It came from deciding where the game would be played and which players would be allowed to influence it.

That is a far more sophisticated form of control.

Tottenham’s relegation fear distorted their football

The emotional backdrop mattered enormously.

This was not just another tactical battle.

Tottenham were carrying the psychological pressure of a relegation fight into one of the most structurally demanding tactical systems in modern football.

De Zerbi’s buildup principles require calmness, trust, and precise positional timing. Tottenham instead played with visible anxiety after falling behind.

That anxiety transformed calculated risks into reckless ones.

The irony is painful.

Tottenham’s tactical system is designed to manipulate pressure. Against Chelsea, pressure manipulated Tottenham instead.

The final truth

This match was ultimately decided by Chelsea’s superior midfield structure and positional discipline, which dismantled Tottenham’s risky buildup patterns and forced the defensive chaos that defined the night.

Chelsea looked like a team controlling the geometry of the pitch.

Tottenham looked like a team trying to emotionally outrun their own season.

Tottenham Hotspur had the chance to secure Premier League survival with a draw against Chelsea.

Roberto De Zerbi's side started the game in a positive way and looked to get forward and create some early openings. Mathys Tel hit the post with a header early on and it was a promising start.

However, the momentum soon shifted and Chelsea started to look the better team.

Enzo Fernandez put the home side ahead after 18 minutes when he curled a shot in from outside the box. It was a good finish but he was in plenty of space in the middle of the pitch.

At 1-0, Spurs were very much still in the game as they only needed the one goal.

Then, in the 67th minute the task became a lot harder. Andrey Santos made it 2-0 after Randal Kolo Muani conceded possession with a misplaced pass in midfield. Micky van de Ven was visibly frustrated with the manner of the goal.

It looked to be game over at that point. De Zerbi reacted and James Maddison came off the bench.

Richarlison gave them hope with 16 minutes left when he scored to make it 2-1 and set up a potentially nervous finish.

The visitors also felt as though they were denied a late penalty after Marc Cucurella was tussling with van de Ven and ended up dragging down the Spurs player at a corner, but nothing was given.

Spurs tried to create late chances but it ended in a 2-1 defeat.

Here are four takeaways from the match

It was another decent performance overall

Whilst not being an amazing performance, it was not a bad display from Spurs.

Like against Leeds United last week, they played well enough and looked like a much-improved side from the one that was taking to the pitch under Igor Tudor.

They knew what they had to do to survive and were boosted by West Ham's defeat at the weekend.

A fast start showed that they were capable of causing their hosts problems and playing on the front foot.

Then, after the positive start, they lost their way and did not recover until they scored their goal.

In the end it could have gone either way.

However, in the last week of the season, Spurs will not be able to take too many positives from a good performance because it was not good enough in the sense that they lost the match.

Defeat to Chelsea will not be the reason they are relegated, if that is to be the case on Sunday, but it will feel frustrating as it was another missed opportunity.

It could have all been over

If Spurs had won the game or come away with a point, due to their superior goal difference, they would have been guaranteed to stay up.

Therefore, it is a missed opportunity.

Chelsea are never easy opponents but they were not in good form and their season was drifting away from them.

There will now be a nervy final day of the season for Spurs and West Ham.

Had Spurs scored the first goal of the game or been able to level the scores at 1-1 then they may likely have got what they needed from this game.

The first goal, particularly after a bright start, could have been judged as a key moment. Spurs did not let their heads drop as they only needed to score one goal at that point.

However, it was likely that the second goal was the killer goal and did lead to some heads to drop.

Richarlison steps up again

At times this season, due to injuries and poor form, Spurs have struggled for goals.

It was the Brazilian Richarlison who stepped up for his side again and scored at Stamford Bridge.

He has not always hit the heights of some of his early years at former club Everton but he has delivered for his side this year.

He has played the most games in a single season for Spurs this season, since he joined the north London side in 2022. This has also resulted in one of his best seasons in front of goal for Spurs.

At a time where Spurs need players who can step up, play the physical aspects of the game and demonstrate their experience Richarlison is doing that.

He has the experience of surviving a relegation battle from his time at Everton and this weekend there will be a hope that he can net the goal against his former employers that would help keep his current side in the league.

What does it mean for the table?

Spurs remain two points in front of the Hammers. They know that if they avoid defeat against Everton then they will stay up.

It is in their hands and they do still have the advantage.

That said, Spurs have still only won two games at home all season, against Burnley and Brentford, so it will not be easy against David Moyes' team.

West Ham would have feared that their fate could have been sealed last night if Spurs had got a result. Therefore, Nuno Espirito Santo's side have now been given a lifeline and a chance to survive.

They host Leeds United at the London Stadium and the team from West Yorkshire are in great form. Whereas, West Ham have lost their last three games.

It does, however, remain all to play for on the last day and there could be some twists and turns throughout the ninety minutes in the capital at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium and across town in Stratford.

Roberto De Zerbi was quick to turn his attention to Sunday after his side failed to secure their Premier League survival against Chelsea.

Tottenham came into the game needing only a draw to effectively secure their place in England's top flight for another season, however, goals from Enzo Fernández and Andrey Santos were enough to sink their hopes.

It all now comes down to the final game of the season when the North London side host Everton as they look to end their disappointing season on a high.

Focus shifts to Everton finale

"Now we have to prepare ourselves in the best way to play a final," said De Zerbi.

"Because the true final is not against Manchester United last season, the true final is this Sunday.

"And I would like it to be clear for everyone because Sunday we play for something more than a trophy.

"We play for our pride, our dignity, the history of the club.

"Every one of us will give our best."

Frustration at Stamford Bridge

The Italian coach was also critical of his side's performance at Stamford Bridge, expressing frustration with the manner in which they conceded both goals.

"I think we played a good game, not enough to win," said the Tottenham boss.

"We made too many mistakes in the last third of the pitch and we conceded two goals in a stupid way.

"The first goal from 30 metres from Enzo Fernández, and the second goal we conceded, we lost another stupid ball when we were in total control.

"In the last 20 minutes I think we played with more energy, more passion, and I want to see more of that behaviour.

"Through this very difficult moment, difficult period, difficult days, if we stay strong, we can become better.

"Better as a coach, better as players and better as a people. But we have to stay together, strong, focus on the game and play with personality and with courage."

Roberto de Zerbi delivered key updates on the Tottenham team for their visit to Stamford Bridge.

A point will effectively secure topflight status for Spurs against Chelsea on Tuesday evening, and the new head coach believes his players can turn the positive form from the last month into one big result.

‘They have to believe more in themselves’

He particularly pointed to a young forward who has stepped up to the plate in recent weeks and was heavily involved in both the goals in a 1-1 draw between Spurs and Leeds United last Monday.

There will be also a reunion for a bullish midfielder with his boyhood club while de Zerbi must prep his players to face a man in the middle of the park who was a big part of the plans at Brighton.

“They deserve to stay up, and they deserve to play in the Premier League. They are good players and maybe they have to believe more in themselves and to stop the negative thoughts.

“[Mathys Tel] is a mature guy. Maybe more outside of the pitch than on the pitch because he is not playing so many games in his career, but he has big potential. He is a lovely guy, he is a positive guy and he has strong character. In the future he can play better, and he can become a great player for us.

“Guglielmo Vicario is available to play, and I will decide tomorrow (if he plays). Dominic Solanke is not good yet. He is not available. He feels something and I don’t want to take a risk for this game. We hope for Sunday, maybe for Sunday he can be available for one part of the game.

“Vicario is number one, but we have to consider the physical condition, the moment, everything, but I have a big relationship with Antonin Kinsky and Vicario as well and there will not be any problem.

“Cristian Romero is a big player, you know he is a big player, but he is an amazing guy because he has been a great captain in my time even though he didn’t play. We are talking by phone, when he stays here, every morning he came in my office, and he was inside of the season.

“From Conor Gallagher, I expect the same performance. He’s a great player, a great personality. He doesn’t speak too much, but he speaks on the pitch with his work, with his personality, and we are lucky to have a player like this.

“Moises Caicedo is one of the best midfielders in the world because he’s a complete player, with the ball, without the ball, but also our midfielders are very good – Joao Palhinha, Rodrigo Bentancur, Gallagher, Archie Gray, Yves Bissouma, Lucas Bergvall, Pape Matar Sarr – and I'm happy.

Tottenham Hotspur could feel hard done by after Monday night's 1-1 draw with Leeds United. A win at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium would have confirmed Premier League survival after what has been an utterly disastrous season, following West Ham's loss at Newcastle United on Sunday.

However, the question that remains unanswered is whether or not things may have been very different had some rather controversial refereeing decisions gone in their favour?

On Monday night, the result could have swung in their favour, had referee Jarred Gillett been advised to change his decision, or even go to the pitch-side monitor for a tackle by Lukas Nmecha on James Maddison in the thirteenth minute of stoppage time. Maddison, returning from a 277-day ACL injury lay-off, took to social media to voice his displeasure at the decision, claiming that Nmecha had not touched the ball.

The VAR, which was operated by Craig Pawson during that clash with Daniel Farke's side, looked at the decision for less than a minute before informing on-field referee Gillett that there was no infringement. Earlier in the clash, Gillett was sent to the pitch-side monitor to overturn his original decision of no penalty after Mathys Tel caught Leeds' Ethan Ampadu on the face, with the penalty being awarded, allowing Dominic Calvert-Lewin to send The Whites back up north with a point.

Now, obviously, the penalty being awarded to Roberto De Zerbi's side would not guarantee a goal or the points, but it would have provided a huge opportunity for Spurs, as well as being their first penalty of the season.

Based on the fantasy that those decisions went in their favour, the results in matches that they have not won may have painted a totally different picture of their poor campaign, which sees them needing one point from their final two matches to maintain their top-flight status. In fact, without VAR, they would already have secured safety, and had the correct decisions on the pitch been made originally, it begs the question that they may have found themselves even higher in the standings.

Gillett at the centre of controversy

The controversy surrounding the game with Leeds will not be the first time that The Lilywhites will feel hard done by when Jarred Gillett has taken charge of their matches throughout the 2025/26 season.

Rewinding to November, Tottenham suffered a 1-0 defeat to Chelsea at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, in a game which ultimately turned out to be the beginning of the end for Thomas Frank. However, in the second half of that London Derby, Enzo Fernandez was lucky to escape a red card for endangering the safety of an opponent, as the Argentine put his studs on Joao Palhinha's knee.

In January, in what now looks to be a pivotal match in terms of who may come out of the relegation battle on top, Spurs lost against West Ham at home, as Gillett struck again. A 94th-minute goal from Callum Wilson dramatically sealed the points, but in the 84th-minute, it was simply ludicrous that a penalty was not awarded to the hosts for a handball by Ollie Scarles. His arm was fully outstretched as he prodded the ball away from Conor Gallagher, but VAR James Bell checked and cleared the on-field decision.

Even in the reverse fixture in September, which saw Tottenham win 3-0, there was a highly questionable decision to disallow a first-half header from Cristian Romero following the slightest of collisions between Micky van de Ven and Kyle Walker-Peters. Gillett was also the referee that day.

And it all circles back to the Australian, where Spurs will again feel disappointed that The Hammers' loss at St James' Park wasn't more severe. Before the opener, Tomas Soucek clearly handled the ball to block a Bruno Guimaraes cross-cum-shot, whilst the Brazilian was then the subject of another judgment that went Soucek's way in the second half. Having been fouled by the Czech international, Guimaraes was already on the floor, and the whistle had already been blown, when Soucek booted him twice. But Gillett, his assistant and the VAR all failed to spot it.

Coincidentally, Pawson was the official operating the VAR, and those decisions will feel like a kick in the teeth to the onlooking Spurs fans, who feel the pair should have awarded their side a spot kick in the dying embers of the draw with Leeds.

Are Spurs refereed differently?

Cristian Romero was rightly sent off for his studs-up challenge on Casemiro during their 2-0 defeat at Old Trafford in February. Nevertheless, just a few hours later, Brian Brobbey did not see red for a similar tackle against Arsenal, whilst just three weeks earlier, Manchester United were able to count themselves lucky as Diogo Dalot remained on the pitch despite an arguably worse challenge than the two mentioned above.

In December, Xavi Simons was rightly sent off for his tackle on international teammate Virgil van Dijk in the 2-1 loss against Liverpool, but yet again, other decisions for very similar challenges were treated differently and far more leniently. Hwang Hee-Chan committed what could be considered a worse offence than Spurs' Dutchman as he planted his studs onto the calf of Everton's Harrison Armstrong, whilst Phil Foden also avoided red for a carbon copy of Simons' tackle just a matter of weeks later.

However, the pick of the bunch will come from the North London Derby dismantling under Igor Tudor. Six minutes after falling behind for the second time on the night, Randal Kolo Muani was adjudged to have fouled Gabriel as he scored what would have been an equaliser, and Peter Bankes disallowed the goal.

The introduction of 'Match Officials Mic'd Up' has allowed PGMOL Chief Howard Webb to shed light on the thinking behind each decision, whilst the release of audio, which shares the conclusions drawn by the match officials, has allowed fans to understand the difficulty of their job.

However, in a rare scenario, just days after that decision in the defeat against Arsenal, the show saw match referee Bankes exclusively highlight the thought process of his decision, as opposed to the usual analysis by Webb. Audio released by PGMOL captured Bankes telling the complaining Tottenham players that it was a "clear foul, end of." But just a week later, Tudor's men fell to defeat at Fulham and found themselves on the wrong side of the exact same call.

Radu Dragusin was pushed in the back by Raul Jimenez, but the goal was allowed to stand. It sparked fury from within the Spurs fanbase, as well as their Interim Head Coach, who subsequently received a fine by the FA for his comments surrounding consistency, after The Lilywhites had a goal chalked off seven days prior for Kolo Muani placing two hands onto the back of Gabriel.

In December, as they lost against Liverpool, Hugo Ekitike's eventual winner was aided by his two-handed push on captain Romero, but that goal was also allowed to stand.

Key Match Incidents (KMI) Panel disagreement

Introduced during the 2022/23 season, every refereeing decision is evaluated by an independent body known as the Key Match Incidents (KMI) Panel. The body is made up of three former players or coaches, as well as one individual from the PGMOL and one from the Premier League.

On New Year's Day, it was ruled by the KMI Panel that a penalty should have been awarded to Tottenham in their 0-0 draw with Brentford for a foul on Archie Gray. With the game finishing goalless, a chance to open the scoring from twelve yards out may have seen The Lilywhites two points better off than they currently are.

In February, it was judged that Rodri should have been shown a second yellow card, having committed both a high challenge on Gallagher and then a cynical foul on Wilson Odobert, despite already walking the tightrope. Spurs did come back from 2-0 down to pick up a point in that game, but again, it remains unforeseen as to whether or not Manchester City being reduced to ten men would have allowed them to register an additional two points on the board.

Arguably, the worst of them all came in De Zerbi's first game as Head Coach, as they lost 1-0 at Sunderland. Brian Brobbey should have been shown a second yellow card in the second half, with the final factor being his needless push on Romero, which led to the Argentine's season being brought to an abrupt end in April.

Coincidentally, Rob Jones was the referee in both the draw with City and the defeat against The Black Cats, with both games seeing both guilty parties get away with multiple fouls having been booked already.

De Zerbi disgust

The Italian Head Coach, who was given just seven games to save Spurs' season, looks set to achieve that now, and they could wrap it up with a game to spare when they travel to Chelsea on Tuesday night. A win will ensure it is guaranteed, whilst a draw all-but-confirms it, with a mammoth swing in goal difference needed for West Ham to stand any chance of surviving the drop on the final day.

But the former Brighton tactician may believe it could have already been secured had decisions gone in their favour, even in his short time as Spurs boss. They could have secured a different result against Sunderland had they been reduced to ten men, but there is also an argument that Regis Le Bris' side could have had a second man sent off.

Luke O'Nien appeared to catch Destiny Udogie on the calf as the Italian raced through one-on-one with Robin Roefs, but referee Jones and the VAR, operated by James Bell - the same official who failed to award a penalty to Spurs for handball in the loss at home to West Ham in January - remarkably saw nothing wrong with the challenge.

Factoring in the decision not to give Spurs a penalty in the matchup with Leeds, there could be a case that, under De Zerbi, they could be, at the bare minimum, four points better off. That would have secured Premier League survival by now.

Even in his first couple of months at the helm, De Zerbi has appeared visibly frustrated by the way Tottenham are refereed throughout the course of matches. Whether that be through different levels of leniency shown by referees to his team compared to the opposition, or the poor decisions officials are making.

This could also be directed to the Italian himself, who has already been booked twice in just five matches since being appointed. Meanwhile, other Premier League bosses appear to get away unharmed despite their regular, frustrating antics on the sideline. Roberto De Zerbi was warned about his behaviour in the technical area by referee Jarred Gillett after just eleven minutes in the draw with Leeds, before he was shown a yellow card after Ethan Ampadu clattered into both James Maddison and Joao Palhinha and was not shown a card.

He was visibly upset with the refereeing performance on display in that game. Speaking after the full-time whistle against Leeds, De Zerbi said, "The first minute until the end of the game, the referee went to me, ‘if you go out (of the technical area), yellow card,’ and I think they were not calm today.

"Maybe they suffered the pressure of yesterday, the West Ham-Arsenal game and VAR. For sure, we suffer the pressure today for the speed of the ball, for the order of the pitch, and we didn’t play with patience on the ball, frenetic, we were rushed, but also the referee was not calm. I don’t know, I can’t understand the polemic about yesterday's VAR because it was a foul, 200 per cent, not 100 per cent, if you want to talk about football."

Again, it makes you think whether or not there is a different, far-lower level of tolerance shown towards Tottenham than other teams in the Premier League.

The impact

The decisions aforementioned do not even begin to scratch the surface.

In the 2-2 draw with Newcastle in December, Rodrigo Bentancur conceded a penalty despite being placed in a headlock by Dan Burn. When Spurs drew 1-1 with Sunderland in January, Brobbey could have easily seen red in that game too - he later scored the equaliser. Virgil van Dijk was lucky to remain on the pitch after a possible DOGSO (Denial of an Obvious Goal Scoring Opportunity) offence when The Lilywhites drew 1-1 at Anfield in March.

It is factually impossible to predict the exact outcomes of these games had decisions gone Tottenham's way. But one thing that is for certain is that there is a maximum of twenty points that could have been handed out differently, and may have landed the North Londoners in a very different position ahead of their final two matches of the season.

There is also the overarching issue of the overall standard of refereeing, which is affecting every team in the league and stirring up a talking point every single week. With that being considered, the table may also look rather different, but it does feel as though no one has been affected to the same level as the sheer scale that Tottenham have.

In an alternative universe, Spurs sit on 58 points and are in a favourable position to secure the final UEFA Champions League spot. In a realistic alternate, they are safe and have been for several weeks, even if just half of the decisions went their way.