Liverpool.com

Liverpool's 2-1 win over Tottenham earlier this month was marred by two controversial red cards, a questionable goal being awarded, and a robust challenge that went unpunished.

The Premier League's Key Match Incidents (KMI) Panel has ruled that four controversial referee decisions from Liverpool’s win over Tottenham Hotspur two weeks ago were all correct.

The Reds won 2-1 in an ill-tempered game in North London, which saw Spurs finish with nine players. Xavi Simons and Cristian Romero were shown red cards, although Liverpool struggled to contain the depleted Tottenham in the latter stages of the game.

Simons was shown a straight red card in the 33rd minute when he trod on the back of Virgil van Dijk’s calf. Referee John Brooks originally issued a yellow card, but after reviewing the footage at the pitchside monitor, he upgraded the penalty to a red card.

Romero’s dismissal was equally as needless, with the Tottenham center-back shown a second booking in the latter stages of the game for kicking out at Ibrahima Konate.

Thomas Frank was disappointed with both calls and felt that neither necessarily warranted a red card.

The Spurs boss also lamented the decision to permit Hugo Ekitike’s second-half goal. The Frenchman nodded in from Jeremie Frimpong’s cross, but replays showed his hands were placed on the back of Romero, who dropped to the turf following the slight touch.

“That's unbelievable, it's a huge mistake,” Frank told Sky Sports after the game. “I think there's something about the red you can discuss and the two yellows that you can discuss in a lot of ways, but the second one is a huge mistake.”

However, the Premier League’s KMI panel, which reviews decisions made by referees, has concluded it was correct to allow the goal as there was “not enough contact for a foul”.

The KMI panel also agreed with the decisions to send off Simons and Romero, and ruled that Micky van de Ven should not have been shown a red card for his leg-breaking tackle on Alexander Isak.

The Liverpool striker netted the opening goal in the 56th minute, but Van de Ven’s desperate lunge to try and prevent it saw him clatter into Isak’s standing leg, resulting in a fibula fracture and ankle injury that required surgery.

Arne Slot slammed the decision not to send off his fellow Dutchman.

“It was a reckless challenge,” said the Liverpool head coach. “I've said a lot about the tackle of Xavi Simons [who was sent off], which for me was completely unintentional. I don't think you will ever get an injury out of a tackle like that.

“But the tackle of [Micky] van de Ven, if you make a tackle like that 10 times, 10 times there is a chance the player gets a serious injury.”

Tottenham captain Cristian Romero was shown a second yellow card during his side's 2-1 defeat to Liverpool at the weekend, and has now been charged by The FA for his reaction

The Football Association has slapped Cristian Romero with a charge for allegedly failing to promptly exit the pitch and behaving improperly towards the referee after his red card against Liverpool.

Romero became the second Spurs player to be sent off during the Reds' 2-1 win on Saturday, after Xavi Simons saw red for a late challenge on Virgil van Dijk. The Tottenham captain was shown a second yellow card late on in the game after he kicked out at Ibrahima Konate, before angrily remonstrating with referee John Brooks.

An official statement from The FA spokesperson reads: "Tottenham Hotspur's Cristian Romero has been charged following their Premier League match against Liverpool on Saturday 20 December. It's alleged that he acted in an improper manner by failing to promptly leave the field of play and/or behaving in a confrontational and/or aggressive manner towards the match referee after being sent off in the 93rd minute.

"Cristian Romero has until Friday 2 January 2026 to respond."

This deadline falls a day after Tottenham's New Year's Day clash with Brentford, and two days before it hosts Sunderland.

Romero will certainly miss Spurs' fixture against Crystal Palace on 28 December due to the automatic one-match suspension incurred from receiving two yellow cards in the same game, reports Football London.

Spurs head coach Thomas Frank expressed his displeasure at the decision to dismiss Romero. He stated: "You can see there's probably a reason why the whole team reacted as they do. I think that's probably a good indicator.

"Normally, if it's one player reacting, if it's the whole team, probably because there's something about it. I think we all played football enough and seen enough football that there's something probably around that.

"So, I can't see if it's right or wrong that he gives the first yellow. The second yellow, I see two big boys competing; Konate absolutely smashing through Cuti [Romero].

"It's a foul, I'm not saying more. His foot landed on Cuti's head. Not a yellow, I'm not saying that.

"Cuti makes a reaction. I think I guess it can be given, but also I guess it can be not given."

The Liverpool forward is set for a prolonged period on the sidelines after suffering a broken leg in the win over Tottenham, but there has been a backlash after he walked off the pitch, supported by club medical staff

Former Chelsea defender Jason Cundy has slammed Liverpool for a “dereliction of care” over the club’s handling of Alexander Isak’s injury.

It was confirmed on Monday that Isak sustained a broken fibula and also suffered an ankle injury in the 2-1 win over Tottenham Hotspur. The ex-Newcastle United striker underwent surgery to address the issue, and Arne Slot confirmed on Tuesday that he is not expecting Isak to return for several months.

The 26-year-old was in clear discomfort when his foot got caught under Micky van de Ven’s outstretched leg, as he scored the opening goal of the game. Isak immediately signalled to the bench that he was in real discomfort and had to be helped off the field by Liverpool’s medical staff.

But Cundy was astonished that a stretcher was not called for to ensure his safe withdrawal from the pitch.

“I find it astonishing that they are commodities worth multi-millions of pounds, in his case, over £100M,” the radio host said on talkSPORT’s The Sports Bar.

“It’s a dereliction of care that they got him to walk off that field. There was a stretcher.

“You and I were doing the phone-in and I said ‘He’s walking off’ and you said ‘the stretcher is behind’,” he added, speaking to cohost Jamie O’Hara.

“I just do not get it. I cannot believe they made him walk on a broken leg. Just think about that, a professional athlete, Liverpool has played well in excess of £100M, and making him walk off the field to play with a broken leg, dereliction of care.

“And it's not just Liverpool, by the way they're all at it,” Cundy continued. “I just saw Bruno [Fernandes] come off the field to play yesterday; he's done a hamstring and he's then walking back down the touchline.

“I've done a hamstring, I've done a bad one, like grade three, so his is not that bad, but give him a crutch to walk. Protect the injury.

“I don't get it. Straight after the injury, hasn't been assessed, wrap him in cotton wool.

“Isak, limping off, he was in tears. You saw him. He knew he'd done something bad.

“I was angry watching it. I can only imagine how he might feel now. It's their job to care for his well-being, for his fitness and his health. Get the little buggies on to protect that player.”

The club has revealed the full extent of the injury suffered to Alexander Isak in Saturday's win over Tottenham Hotspur, with the forward hurting himself as he scored the opening goal of the game

Liverpool has confirmed Alexander Isak underwent surgery on the leg injury he sustained against Tottenham Hotspur last weekend.

Arne Slot is expected to provide an update on the situation on Tuesday, but the club announced ahead of the head coach's press conference at the AXA Training Centre that Isak suffered a fractured fibula and ankle injury as a result of the strong challenge from Micky van de Ven.

The Tottenham defender slid in and caught Isak high on the leg as he converted Florian Wirtz's pass to score the opening goal of the game.

The former Newcastle United man appeared in immediate discomfort and had to be helped off the pitch by two members of staff.

"It's difficult to know what he exactly has," Slot said immediately after the game. "But it's never a nice thing that after the goal he collided with their defender. Hopefully he's fine, but we have to wait and see."

Reports subsequently emerged that Isak had sustained a serious, long-term problem, and perhaps even a broken leg. That prognosis was confirmed by Liverpool on Monday, along with the news that no timescale has been placed on Isak's recovery.

"Alexander Isak today successfully underwent surgery on the injury he sustained on Saturday," the club said via a statement.

"The Liverpool striker was injured in a challenge in the process of scoring the opening goal against Tottenham Hotspur and had to be substituted.

"After diagnosis, an operation was completed today on an ankle injury that included a fibula fracture.

"Isak's rehabilitation will now continue at the AXA Training Centre, with no timeframe yet placed on his return."

The injury is a hammer blow to Liverpool. Slot's small squad has already been diminished by Giovanni Leoni's season-ending injury, while Mohamed Salah is currently at the Africa Cup of Nations with Egypt.

The news also continues Isak's nightmare start at Liverpool since his record-breaking £125 million ($168M) transfer on deadline day.

The 26-year-old arrived lacking match fitness and, after finally being declared match fit by Slot, suffered a groin injury days later.

He recovered in late November, but his performances have underwhelmed in the weeks since.

Isak did manage to score his first Premier League goal in win over West Ham on November 30, and Saturday's strike against Spurs was just his second in the league since joining Liverpool.

Liverpool's £125m record signing Alexander Isak suffered a suspected broken leg whilst scoring in Saturday's 2-1 win at Tottenham, but his previous injury experience at Newcastle could provide insight

Liverpool is bracing itself for record signing Alexander Isak to face a lengthy period out of action after sustaining a suspected broken leg during Saturday's 2-1 triumph over Tottenham Hotspur.

The 26 year old picked up the injury whilst netting the opener, coming down awkwardly following a late sliding tackle from Spurs defender Micky van de Ven. The challenge left the Swedish striker grasping his leg in agony and unable to join his teammates in celebration. Medical personnel attended to him before he limped off to make way for Jeremie Frimpong, who was himself later withdrawn after being caught by a wayward arm from Richarlison.

Initial reports indicate that an MRI scan will likely confirm Liverpool's deepest concerns that its record summer acquisition has indeed fractured his leg. Speaking directly after the match, Reds manager Arne Slot commented: "It's difficult to know what he exactly has. But it's never a nice thing that after the goal he collided with their defender. Hopefully he's fine, but we have to wait and see."

The setback represents a devastating blow for Liverpool, leaving the club with only Hugo Ekitike as a fit, recognised forward, with Cody Gakpo sidelined until the New Year and Mohamed Salah away representing his country at the Africa Cup of Nations.

Isak has struggled to settle into life at Anfield, managing just three goals in 16 outings across all competitions, but seemed to be discovering his rhythm after dispatching a clinical finish beyond Spurs goalkeeper Guglielmo Vicario.

The British transfer fee record-holder will draw upon experience gained at St James' Park, where a series of injuries similarly threatened to disrupt his settling-in period at a new club, reports the Mirror.

Following his move to Newcastle from La Liga side Real Sociedad, Isak managed only three outings before sustaining a thigh problem whilst on international duty.

The striker would subsequently net 54 Premier League goals for the Magpies across just three campaigns, though he later credited Newcastle's patient approach to his setback as vital in enabling his explosive return to form.

Speaking to Swedish media outlet Fotbollskanalen, Isak revealed: "I got a thigh injury. The first six months at the club were tough and it took some time to come back from the injury, but it was still okay because I still got to play three games and show a bit.

"Then the team did so well that it took the pressure off me and I could focus on my rehab instead of thinking the team needed me. It helped a bit, but it's clear it wasn't easy."

The Swedish international was sidelined for four fixtures at the end of October and beginning of November due to a groin complaint and could now be facing up to six months on the treatment table if scans confirm he has fractured his leg.

The responsibility now falls on his team-mates to maintain the positive results and alleviate the immense pressure Isak is facing due to his hefty price tag.

Alexander Isak suffered a suspected leg break from Micky van de Ven's tackle during the match at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, with referee experts divided on whether it should have been a red card

Liverpool have received a fresh referee verdict on Micky van de Ven's challenge on Alexander Isak, which led to the striker suffering a suspected leg break.

Arne Slot's team clinched a narrow victory in north London on Saturday evening, with Isak netting the first goal in the second half. However, after his successful strike, a slide tackle from Van de Ven caught the striker's leg as he planted it, forcing him out of the game. The immediate reaction of his teammates painted a grim picture. A stretcher was summoned, but Isak managed to hobble off the pitch with assistance from Liverpool's medical team.

Initial fears among supporters suggested a potential ACL injury, but the club quickly dismissed this. Nevertheless, the suspected diagnosis is no less serious. Reports on Sunday hinted at a possible lower leg break, but the severity of the injury and the length of recovery time remain uncertain, with the club set to provide an update following scans, reports the Liverpool Echo.

Understandably, the incident sparked questions from spectators as to why Van de Ven wasn't penalised given the harshness of the tackle. Replays revealed that he lunged into the challenge with little chance of getting the ball, resulting in a severe injury.

The incident has sparked debate, with pundits on Sky Sports' Ref Watch split over whether it warranted a red card. Former professional Jay Bothroyd argued that whilst Van de Ven's intention would not have been to injure Isak, the reckless nature of the challenge merited a sending-off.

"Van de Ven has not intentionally tried to hurt Isak," he explained. "Obviously, he is desperate to stop a goal and he's coming across to stop the shot.

"This is an example where, yes, Isak has scored, but it should still be a red card. He's lunging, he's going into him. Every explanation you want to give for a red-card challenge is there. Because he's scored, they've let it go.

"He's lunged, he's out of control. He's trying to make a block but he's never going to get there. If that's in the middle of the park, that's a red card."

Former referee Dermot Gallagher disagreed, however, maintaining that the challenge was not a red-card offence and that the outcome of the tackle should not take precedence over its nature.

"I can't see that he's done anything that a footballer wouldn't," he explained. "I would be astonished if that was given as a red card anywhere on the field.

"Players mistime challenges all the time. He's slightly late... it's not a red card. Whether it be in the penalty area, in the D, the centre circle or the other half."

However, the two pundits did concur that the referee made the right call in sending off Xavi Simons for his tackle on Virgil van Dijk in the first half. The Dutchman's high and reckless challenge on his national team captain resulted in his studs making contact with the defender's calf.

"I want to make clear that I don't think Simons has any intention to do this, but he has done it," Gallagher commented on the Simons incident. "Once you see the replay, you can't unsee it.

"When VAR sees that, in modern football, it is always going to be a red card. He's unlucky, but he is always going to see red. You can't make challenges like that anymore."

Djed Spence was accused of diving during Tottenham's 2-1 defeat to Liverpool, with Ian Wright calling it a 'blatant dive' as ex-referee Keith Hackett calls for retrospective punishment

Former Premier League referee Keith Hackett has urged authorities to introduce retrospective bans for simulation, following Ian Wright's accusation that Tottenham's Djed Spence dived during Saturday's 2-1 loss to Liverpool.

The controversial moment unfolded in the 45th minute when Spence embarked on a surging run from deep within his own territory before tumbling inside the Liverpool penalty area after seemingly being clipped by Conor Bradley. However, replays revealed there was scant contact and no spot-kick was given, leaving Spurs and Thomas Frank seething.

Offering his assessment of the decision to deny Tottenham a penalty, Wright told Premier League Productions: "You can see the other player behind him. He's got no chance of getting that ball on the other side. So he's just knocked it inside and just wanted contact and got it. It's a blatant dive for me."

Now Hackett, a former FIFA-listed official, has called for suspensions to be imposed on players caught diving during matches, with Spence being the latest to face scrutiny, reports Football London.

Speaking to Tottenham News, Hackett said: "Sadly, going to ground to deceive the referee by an act of simulation is a regular occurrence in the modern game.

"It will continue if referees fail to sanction. I do believe that the authorities need to consider retrospective punishment for acts of simulation."

Tottenham almost managed to rescue a point against Liverpool on Saturday but couldn't secure a positive result from the encounter. The hosts ultimately succumbed to a 2-1 defeat, having battled with 10 men for over an hour.

The match remained evenly poised until Xavi Simons received his marching orders in the 33rd minute for a reckless challenge on Virgil van Dijk. The contest remained tight until Liverpool stepped up a gear after the interval, with Alexander Isak firing the Reds into the lead with an excellent strike before Hugo Ekitike extended their lead moments later.

Spurs, who were reduced to nine players in second-half injury time when Cristian Romero was dismissed, managed to pull one back through Richarlison, but it was insufficient.

"I think overall it was a good performance tonight, proud of the players and the team and how they responded," Frank said post-match.

"I actually think the first 30 was also good from us and how we responded to setbacks through the game, something we have been working very hard on, because that is the biggest thing the best teams need to do.

"How do we respond to setbacks during a game because the best teams deal with it and move on and keep going, stick to the plan, we talked about it before, structure and everything. Today we did that excellently. There was great personality and character in the team."

Tottenham midfielder Xavi Simons was sent off in Liverpool's 2-1 Premier League win on Saturday after a challenge on Virgil van Dijk, but Gary Lineker does not think it was a red card offense

Gary Lineker believes Tottenham star Xavi Simons shouldn't have received a red card during Liverpool's 2-1 victory over Spurs on Saturday. The Netherlands international was dismissed in the 33rd minute following a late tackle on Virgil van Dijk.

Van Dijk had played the ball back to Alisson Becker when Simons appeared to make contact with the Liverpool skipper late on the back of his Achilles. Referee John Brooks initially brandished a yellow card to the Spurs player, but was subsequently advised by VAR to review the incident on his pitch-side monitor.

Brooks chose to upgrade the caution to red, dismissing Simons and leaving Tottenham with 10 men. Spurs boss Thomas Frank was incensed by the decision in his post-match press conference, declaring the "game is gone", whilst Arne Slot felt Simons hadn't made a deliberate attempt to harm Van Dijk.

Now, former Everton and Tottenham striker Lineker has offered his perspective on the red card, reports the Liverpool Echo.

"I'm going to have a little bit of a rant myself here," he said on The Rest Is Football.

"I know in slow motion you can pick it apart, his [Xavi Simons] studs may have caught the back of his [Virgil van Dijk] calf, but the fella is just trying to put his foot on the ground.

"I mean there's absolutely zero intent. I mean yes, Virg might have got hurt, that happens in football, it happens all the time, doesn't mean to say it's a vicious foul. I just can't stand red cards for things like that, it was nothing. It's another one of those that looks in slow motion, you go 'ooh, blimey, he's raked down the back of his calf'.

"In normal speed it wasn't that, it's not like that at all. It's not like that at all. And I know they all thought it was a red card and you two may think it's a red card, and I understand now that when they look at things, they might go and break it down so slowly, but when you see it in normal speed, it's just his foot landing, he flicks him.

"It's nothing, it's absolutely nothing."

Alan Shearer added: "It's totally accidental, totally accidental, yeah."

Lineker continued: "Yellow card would've sufficed."

Simons, meanwhile, apologized after the game. He said on social media: "Mistakes happen. Virg is my captain, I would never intentionally hurt him or anyone.

"To my Spurs teammates, my manager and the fans, I take responsibility. I'm really sorry."

Van Dijk then chipped in with his verdict and said: "I don't think there was any intention to hurt me but obviously he hurt me and then the referee and the VAR made the decision to send him off.

"I spoke to him. It's a chat that no-one needs to know."

Liverpool has been linked with a move for Antoine Semenyo in January, along with the likes of Manchester City and Manchester United, but the Reds may hold an advantage

Liverpool is anxiously awaiting the results of Alexander Isak's injury, sustained during Saturday's 2-1 victory over Tottenham Hotspur. However, the January transfer window could provide a timely opportunity should the Reds find themselves short of another forward this winter.

Isak was forced to leave the pitch after bearing the brunt of a Micky van de Ven tackle while scoring Liverpool's opening goal at Spurs. An MRI scan scheduled for Monday will determine the full extent of his injury.

Should the striker face a prolonged period on the sidelines, he would be the third Reds attacker currently unavailable, with Mohamed Salah away on duty with Egypt at the Africa Cup of Nations and Cody Gakpo also sidelined through injury.

Isak is feared to have sustained a broken leg on Saturday, which would likely mean a lengthy spell on the sidelines, and leave Liverpool even shorter on options in attack amid a growing injury list.

The solution could be a £65 million ($87M) investment in the transfer market this coming January. Currently, Liverpool is among several clubs reportedly interested in Bournemouth star Antoine Semenyo.

This figure is understood to be the 25-year-old's release clause, which expires early in the new year, meaning interested parties must move swiftly, reports the Liverpool Echo.

According to The Guardian, Liverpool is competing with major rivals Manchester City, Manchester United and Tottenham, but may have the upper hand as Anfield is rumored to be Semenyo's preferred destination.

It's suggested that Semenyo - who has primarily played on the right wing for his current club under Andoni Iraola - is Arne Slot's choice as a long-term successor to Salah.

However, Gakpo's unavailability might open up a spot on the left flank, whilst Semenyo has lately voiced his ambition to play through the middle in attack - a prospect should Isak be sidelined.

"I'm destined to be a No.9," the Ghanaian told AwayDays on YouTube. "Andoni, gaffer, play me as a nine - that's all I'm gonna say."

Liverpool's game against Tottenham was packed full of incidents after Xavi Simons and Cristian Romero were both sent off, but the hosts may have been lucky not to have received a third red card

Former PGMOL chief Keith Hackett believes there should have been a third red card during Liverpool’s win over Tottenham on Saturday.

Referee John Brooks had a busy evening as the Reds toiled to a 2-1 win over their nine-man hosts in north London. Alexander Isak and Hugo Ekitike provided the goals as Xavi Simons and Cristian Romero were both sent off for Spurs.

Despite their numerical advantage, the visitors did their best to throw away another two-goal lead this season, with Richarlison’s goal setting up a nervy finish in which Liverpool found itself clinging on for the win in stoppage time.

Although Thomas Frank may say otherwise, Tottenham can have little complaint about either of their red cards, with both Simons and Romero’s dismissals easily avoidable.

The former was sent off after raking his studs down the back of Virgil van Dijk’s calf, with the decision escalated by VAR after Brooks had originally awarded a yellow card, while Romero was dismissed after receiving a second yellow card for kicking out at Ibrahima Konate, despite having just won a free-kick against the Liverpool defender.

And according to Hackett, the hosts were lucky not to have been reduced to eight men, with the former Premier League official insisting that Brooks missed a third red card during the game.

Hackett felt that Richarlison could have also been given his marching orders for his reaction following his goal, with the Brazilian having been involved in a tangle with Ekitike as he tried to retrieve the ball.

"There is no doubt that Richarlison is a competitive individual and certainly one that a referee needs to keep his eye on,” Hackett told Football Insider.

"In this particular situation, we see Richarlison with his hand on the neck of his opponent as he is getting up off the ground. There's a little pressure. Could easily have been a red card but was completely missed by officials, ignored by VAR and as a result, nothing happens.

"It could have been a red card mister Richarlison. Behave yourself."

Despite Hackett’s view of the incident, Richarlison would avoid any sort of punishment until he was shown a yellow card at full-time, having protested with Brooks about the amount of stoppage time added on at the end of the game.