“Are we finished or not?” Tottenham gaffer shows Sky Sports man to be a nitwit

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image

I have little time for Sky Sports; they started their business in the country with a specific customer profile. Indeed, there was a running joke that virtually every council house had one of its dishes stuck on the outside. They then decided that most of their viewers were bigoted and began running campaigns that, quite frankly, attacked their core customers. A brief look at Comcast’s collapse across Europe answers any questions that anyone might have.

Tudor, as Tottenham’s interim boss, was under pressure amid rumours of potential sacking if Spurs lost, and the interview with reporter Patrick Davidson turned tense and awkward. Tudor was asked about providing “hope” to fans and whether the point showed Spurs didn’t need a new manager.

He pushed back strongly, saying questions about his future aren’t for him to answer (“No, that’s not a question for me. I’m the coach, you need to ask me about the player, about how we play…”) and accused the reporter of insisting on the same repetitive questions.

The interview ended abruptly when Tudor, visibly frustrated, asked, “Are we finished or not?” before walking off after the reporter confirmed it was over. In the final frames Patrick Davidson smirks, but he was the loser.

The clip has gone viral, with Sky Sports posting it as a “spicy” interview, and reactions ranging from praise for Tudor standing his ground against what many called intrusive or disrespectful questioning, to noting the awkwardness.

Patrick Davidson is a long-time touchline reporter for Sky Sports, primarily covering the Premier League. He conducts pitch-side interviews with players and managers before and after matches, often for Sky Sports Premier League broadcasts.

His reporting style is frequently described as direct, persistent, and probing, sometimes to the point of being confrontational or provocative. He tends to press managers on sensitive topics like job security, tactical decisions, team performance under pressure, or inconsistencies, even when the subject is reluctant or defensive. This approach aims to elicit candid responses or admissions but often leads to tense or awkward exchanges.