Ultimately, Tottenham Hotspur lost 2-1 to Aston Villa because of two fantastic strikes from outside the box, courtesy of Morgan Rogers and Emi Buendia. No one could have anticipated the quality of those efforts, but the game overall was entirely predictable. It was, as Thomas Frank said afterwards, “everything I expected it to be”.
The 2025-26 Premier League campaign has started with the most concerns about the league’s entertainment value since way back in 2004-05, when football seemed to have taken a particularly defensive turn.
It was Tottenham who accidentally found themselves at the centre of the debate back then, when Jose Mourinho introduced the ‘parking the bus’ phrase to English football when complaining about Tottenham’s successful defensive approach against his Chelsea side in a goalless draw.
Twenty-one years on, Tottenham again feel like the best representation of the sudden shift in this season’s football style.
After two years of Spurs being coached by Ange Postecoglou, with all the obvious strengths and weaknesses of his front-foot philosophy, Frank is a coach renowned for his pragmatism. Under his leadership, his previous side, Brentford, were known for their direct play and emphasis on set pieces.
While it would be unreasonable to expect his Tottenham side to have figured everything out by mid-October, this was a performance that summed everything up: not just where Tottenham are at, but also where the division overall finds itself.
This was a contest between — in the context of European football — two good sides. Tottenham are the Europa League holders, Aston Villa briefly caused European champions Paris Saint-Germain a real scare in the Champions League last season. Both are going well this season in Europe, too. On that basis alone, we should have expected a reasonable amount of quality football.
But, instead, it was overwhelmingly based around set pieces. Tottenham’s opening goal featured two powerful midfielders combining in the box, in the aftermath of a set-piece situation, with Rodrigo Bentancur slamming home Joao Palhinha’s knockdown. That in itself was typical of the season in a different way: deep midfielders have contributed more than their fair share of goals this season, and of Spurs’ starting XI here, Palhinha is Tottenham’s top scorer this campaign.
It’s not just about corners and free kicks, either. The long throw is ultra-fashionable again, and while this is clearly a useful part of any side’s armoury, Kevin Danso’s deliveries constituted Spurs’ main weapon against Villa, which felt particularly odd considering he wasn’t even due to start, only stepping up late on when Cristian Romero pulled out in the warm-up.
Danso gets great distance on his throws, and one caused Villa serious problems, but by the time he’d hurled the ball into the box for the sixth time, usually after an inevitably long wait while the centre-back jogged over to the touchline and had located the nearest towel, you couldn’t help feeling that this approach was wasting too much time and giving the opposition a breather.
In open play, it’s clear that Tottenham’s attackers don’t offer any cohesive combinations, which you can say about half the league at the moment. That is understandable considering Mohammed Kudus and Xavi Simons are new arrivals, while Wilson Odobert and Mathys Tel arrived last summer and in January respectively. But here they were operating on four different wavelengths, with Tel spending most of the first half making a run, not getting the pass, then gesturing to where he had wanted it.
Of the front four, it is Kudus who has been brightest this season by showing good understanding with his team-mates, most obviously in the opening game of the season when he twice assisted Richarlison in a 3-0 win over Burnley.
Simons, as the No 10, is tasked with connecting everyone around him: two midfielders who rarely pass forward, two wingers who tend to stay wide, and a centre-forward who isn’t involved much in build-up play. That’s a tough task for a 22-year-old who has recently moved to a new league.
Afterwards, Frank acknowledged the limitations of his side’s attack, but indicated that his initial focus was on improving “the four to five good transitional moments, where we could have done more”.
The understanding required to break down deeper defences, you suspect, will take even longer, which is fair enough, but it is also grating considering Tottenham could, until fairly recently, depend on Harry Kane and Son Heung-min, statistically the best partnership the Premier League has seen at creating goals for each other. The man who completed the trio in latter years, Dejan Kulusevski, is missed as much for his club as he is for his country.
Like most Premier League clubs, Tottenham have decent depth. The division’s financial dominance over other leagues isn’t necessarily reflected in the quality of the top players, but in the backups.
Tottenham are able to bring on players such as Richarlison and Randal Kolo Muani. The former scored the best goal at the last World Cup, the latter nearly played a decisive role in the final. Another sub, Brennan Johnson, scored the Europa League winner. Perhaps the most exciting reserve is Lucas Bergvall, who offers badly needed ability to knit things together; without a player in that mould, things were too easy for Aston Villa.
Indeed, Unai Emery’s analysis was succinct and telling. “We adapted to everything tactically,” he said when asked to explain why his side came out on top. “In duels, set pieces, throw-ins.” And they, slightly depressingly, are the main qualities needed to win a Premier League game at the moment.