The New York Times

Tottenham’s Richarlison says he was ‘very close’ to Vasco da Gama transfer: ‘It’s my dream’

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Tottenham’s Richarlison says he was ‘very close’ to Vasco da Gama transfer: ‘It’s my dream’ - The Athletic - The New York Times
Description

Tottenham Hotspur forward Richarlison has said he was “very close” to joining Vasco da Gama before the Brazilian transfer window closed on Friday.

Addressing Vasco fans in a video posted to his personal Instagram account, the 29-year-old said he had made it clear during negotiations he wished to join Vasco on a loan deal through to December — the end of the Brazil 2026 club season — but claimed the deal broke down over Tottenham’s demands.

It comes after the ex-Watford and Everton striker, who was Tottenham’s leading scorer in the Premier League last season with 11 goals to help the club avoid relegation, was omitted from their Premier League squad for the season.

“Other offers were made to me but I made it very clear I wanted to join Vasco until December,” Richarlison, whose family support the Rio de Janeiro-based club, said.

“Unfortunately, Tottenham set a limit on the loan, which is why it didn’t work out.”

Richarlison added in his video that a move to the Brazilian club may happen in the near future: “I think I’ll be at Sao Januario (Vasco’s stadium) soon, and in Barreira (the Rio district in which they play), and you know how fond I am of you all.

“One day I’m going to make this dream come true; it’s my dream, my grandfather’s dream, and my family’s dream. I’m speaking from the heart here because I really wanted to play for Vasco.”

A move back to Brazil is now off the table, with the nation’s transfer window closing at 11pm local time on Friday (4am UK on Saturday).

On Friday, Spurs head coach Roberto De Zerbi said Richarlison was a “very good guy” but added on his future: “I spent time to convince him to stay, but if you ask me, I know the truth.

“I know what happened in the last month, the last 45 days, and it’s clear, but I’m not frustrated.

“If I had decided myself to leave him outside of the squad, I would have regrets, but the decision has not even been taken by the club. It has been a consequence of what I told you already that he has decided (to leave).”

The Athletic reported earlier this month that Turkish club Trabzonspor had made an unsuccessful attempt to sign Richarlison. The deadline for Turkish clubs to register players was September 4, three days after the UK window closed, but no deal came to fruition.

Tottenham agreed a deal with Everton for the transfer of Richarlison before the UK deadline but he declined the personal terms on offer, before making a series of cryptic remarks on Instagram.

“After everything I’ve been through in the last few years, I’ve decided that never again will anyone decide my future for me,” Richarlison wrote. “I went through a lot of bad things, and almost all of them happened because decisions were made by other people. Pressure, threats, retaliation — none of that scares me. I’ve been through far worse, believe me.”

Richarlison is into the final 12 months of the five-year contract he signed upon joining Tottenham from Everton in 2022.

The Brazil international was pushed further down the pecking order by the arrival of Omar Marmoush from Manchester City, and has not been involved in a matchday squad since the opening-day defeat at Brentford.

Lucas Bergvall signs new Tottenham contract, three months after telling club he wanted to leave

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Lucas Bergvall signs new Tottenham contract, three months after telling club he wanted to leave - The New York Times
Description

Lucas Bergvall has signed a new contract with Tottenham Hotspur.

Friday’s announcement comes after the 20-year-old midfielder’s future was uncertain throughout the summer. The Athletic reported in June that the Sweden international had expressed a preference to leave, with Nottingham Forest and Newcastle United submitting bids which were rejected by Spurs.

At the start of Spurs’ pre-season tour of Australia and New Zealand, head coach Roberto De Zerbi said the pair had not spoken and that anyone “who is not happy, is not proud to stay here, has to leave”.

De Zerbi performed a U-turn after a productive conversation with Bergvall during the tour. The Swede was never unhappy in north London but wanted a clear development plan. De Zerbi then said in public he knew what Bergvall’s best position was and he had “needed time to understand the characteristics of the players” in the squad.

“I think we’re building something great here. It’s an exciting time for the club and that’s why I’m happy to extend my contract,” Bergvall said in a club release.

De Zerbi added: “Every day in training you can see Lucas’ desire to learn, improve and push himself to the highest level. I believe his best football is still ahead of him and we want to give Lucas the platform to reach his full potential.”

Bergvall started Spurs’ opening two games of the season, the 3-0 defeat by Brentford in the Premier League and the 5-1 victory over Charlton Athletic in the Carabao Cup. He was substituted at half-time against Brentford after making a mistake which led to Vitaly Janelt scoring and has not come off the bench in their last two top-flight fixtures against Newcastle and Forest.

Bergvall joined Spurs from Swedish side Djurgarden in the summer of 2024. He previously signed a contract extension in April 2025, which ran until 2031. This latest deal reflects how Spurs view Bergvall as an important member of the squad right now and for the long term.

Bergvall’s future sorted – now he needs to kick on

A strange sequence of events has led to a positive outcome.

Bergvall became frustrated towards the end of last season at being played out of position in training and due to restricted game time. At the beginning of the summer, he expressed a preference to leave Spurs despite enjoying the majority of his time in north London and having a strong connection with the fans. Spurs’ record-breaking signings of Mateus Fernandes and Sandro Tonali appeared, on paper, to signal the end of his time with the club.

Spurs rejected bids from Forest and Newcastle. Then Bergvall impressed De Zerbi on tour and the pair’s relationship improved following a productive conversation. Bergvall wanted, and was given, a clear development plan. This new deal reflects how all parties think he can be a force for Spurs right now and in the long-term.

Bergvall’s pathway to more consistent game time is still not going to be easy. He has not featured in the Premier League since the opening day of the season when he underwhelmed against Brentford and was taken off at half-time. Along with new signings Fernandes and Tonali, he needs to compete with Rodrigo Bentancur, Conor Gallagher, James Maddison and Archie Gray for minutes.

However, Bergvall showed during the 2024-25 season that he can be a positive influence when he plays regularly. Bergvall won multiple player of the year awards in his first season in English football after leaving Sweden at only 18.

With his future finally settled after months of uncertainty, hopefully Bergvall can kick on and show people why Spurs had to fight off interest from Barcelona to sign him in 2024.

Richarlison considering legal action against Tottenham to try and cancel contract

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Richarlison considering legal action against Tottenham to try and cancel contract - The New York Times
Description

Richarlison is considering legal action against Tottenham Hotspur to try to cancel his contract.

The Brazil international has been in limbo ever since he was left out of Tottenham’s 25-man Premier League squad for this season, which was announced one week ago.

Attempts to find a move for Richarlison have so far failed. He was close to a return to former club Everton at the end of the Premier League window, only to fail to agree terms. He was then subject to interest from Trabzonspor, just before the Turkish window closed.

In the final days of the English transfer window, Richarlison made a series of cryptic remarks on Instagram regarding his future.

“After everything I’ve been through in the last few years, I’ve decided that never again will anyone decide my future for me,” he wrote. “I went through a lot of bad things, and almost all of them happened because decisions were made by other people. Pressure, threats, retaliation — none of that scares me. I’ve been through far worse, believe me.”

Roberto De Zerbi, who picked Richarlison for the opening game of the season at Brentford, but has not picked him since, has been clear in his position that it was Richarlison’s responsibility to find a solution.

“Richarlison decided everything alone,” De Zerbi said in his press conference last week. “He spoke with me at the beginning of pre-season and told me his desire was to leave. I want to keep just the players that want to stay and be proud, with the right passion to stay here.”

Now Richarlison and his team are exploring the possibility of trying to take legal action to cancel what remains of his Tottenham contract, following his sidelining from Spurs’ Premier League squad for this season. Richarlison still has one year remaining on the deal he signed when he joined from Everton in 2022 for an initial £50million.

Under FIFA’s updated ‘Regulations on the Status and Transfers of Players’, parties can in theory cancel a contract when they have ‘Just Cause’, defined as “any circumstance in which a party can no longer reasonably and in good faith be expected to continue a contractual relationship.”

The FIFA regulations state that no club may “abuse the registration or de-registration of a player as a means of pressure” or “separate a player in an abusive manner from training with the team”.

In Brazil, Richarlison has been linked with a move to Vasco da Gama by local media. If he was released from his Tottenham contract then he would be free to join Vasco on a short-term deal without their having to negotiate a fee with Spurs. The Brazilian transfer window shuts early on Saturday morning.

Mauricio Pochettino: Tottenham should be awarded 2016-17 title after Chelsea rule breach

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Mauricio Pochettino: Tottenham should be awarded 2016-17 title after Chelsea rule breach - The Athletic - The New York Times
Description

Mauricio Pochettino believes that his Tottenham Hotspur team should be awarded the 2016-17 Premier League title because of Chelsea’s 74 breaches of financial rules.

Chelsea were fined £10million by the FA this summer, and given a suspended transfer ban, after admitting breaching agent regulations during the Roman Abramovich era, specifically regarding signing players between 2011 and 2018.

But there was no sporting sanction and Pochettino, who managed Tottenham to a second-placed finish behind Chelsea in 2016-17, believes that title should be stripped from Chelsea and re-awarded.

“I’ve said that we should win one title, one Premier League,” Pochettino told reporters. “We should have been awarded it. If that was true, and that happened, for sure we deserve to be champions for that year. Because we were the second best.”

Tottenham finished the 2016-17 campaign with the fewest defeats in the Premier League, and having scored the most goals and conceded the fewest, but ultimately seven points behind Antonio Conte’s Chelsea.

Chelsea’s new ownership found irregularities in the accounts during their purchase of the club in 2022 and self-reported to the authorities, and then admitted to the 74 breaches of FA Rule E1.2. But Pochettino believes that Chelsea and Tottenham were fundamentally playing by different rules during the affected years.

“They were punished, they admitted (it), so that’s it,” Pochettino said. “The title should be for the team that was second. We didn’t compete with the same rules. OK, now we can say that they scored goals, they won games. But it’s completely fair to say that we didn’t compete before the start of the season with the same card. Maybe with the same rules, if we apply the same things, maybe we could have signed some players that would have made the team better, or scored more goals. It’s not me complaining. It’s the truth.”

The FA’s case centres on millions of pounds of payments made to unregistered agents in connection with signings, including Eden Hazard, David Luiz and Nemanja Matic, all of whom were part of Chelsea’s title-winning side in 2016-17. Pochettino believes that Hazard may have made the difference that year.

“The Chelsea fans will be upset with me because I’m saying this,” said Pochettino, who managed Chelsea in the 2023-24 season. “But if we were at Tottenham and broke the rules, I would admit the same and say, ‘Look, we don’t deserve the title because we broke the rules’. It’s impossible if only some clubs play with offside and another plays with no offside. Or one plays with VAR and another plays with no VAR. No. For everyone, it needs to be the same rules, and the capacity to create the best team.”

Pochettino made clear that his issue was not with the players or coaches. “I don’t say that they did not play well. Conte, the coach, was great. I don’t want this message twisted. But if you broke the rules, in the moment, then ‘ciao’. You need to give it to another team.”

English football has traditionally been reluctant to strip titles in cases of wrongdoing but Pochettino believes this sends the worst possible message to clubs.

“What is being promoted and incentivised is to break the rules,” he said. “If you don’t punish the way that you need to punish, I say ‘yes, but I lost my job because we didn’t win the title.”

And Pochettino, who was sacked by Tottenham in November 2019 without winning anything, thinks that his work should be viewed differently in that context. “We were fighting with clubs (who worked) in a completely different way to us. I think we deserve more. We operated in a different way.”

Pochettino says USMNT contract no longer unbreakable post-World Cup: ‘It’s different’

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Pochettino says USMNT contract no longer unbreakable post-World Cup: ‘It’s different’ - The Athletic - The New York Times
Description

For Mauricio Pochettino, it all comes down to human connections.

That is how he sees the world, sees football, and sees his own role in it. All of the best work of his career has been built on that foundation; making players work together, making fans believe in the team, trying to leave a legacy bigger than just wins and losses.

That is how Pochettino wants to look back at his summer, when he took the United States to the last 16 of their home World Cup, invigorating a football nation, before it all ended acrimoniously.

It is why Pochettino says he recommitted to the job, signing a new four-year contract, to repay the trust he feels from U.S. Soccer, and from the American public. There was some surprise in September 2024 — four months after he left Chelsea — when Pochettino was announced as the new head coach of the U.S. side. Before then all five of his jobs were in club football.

But he was recruited, after a huge effort by U.S. Soccer, to take the team into the World Cup. When Pochettino signed that contract, as he explained in detail to reporters in central London earlier this week, he knew that he was fully committed until after the tournament. He wanted to be a man of his word.

“When we gave our word to the federation, it was about starting and finishing, after the World Cup,” Pochettino said. “For us, it was impossible to think about coming back, or going to another club. Because we received some calls from different clubs. But we cannot go away. First, because we didn’t want to go. But in the moment I think it wasn’t right for us to create all these situations and expectations.”

Pochettino is determined to keep the good feelings from the summer going. It was because of that sense of trust and human connection that he decided, against expectations, to sign a new deal last month. It had widely been assumed he would return to the club game this summer instead.

“The one thing that changed our mind: the people,” Pochettino said. “The human beings in the federation.” Even before the World Cup kicked off, the U.S. Soccer board offered him a new deal as a sign of trust in his work. As Pochettino tells it, they respected the fact that he gave them his word and stayed, even when he was attracting interest from the club game. “This type of people, I like to be with them.” Even Pochettino did not expect to generate this much enthusiasm from players and fans, but now he wants to build on it.

Pochettino still clearly values his unique bond with Tottenham Hotspur fans, a relationship that means the world to him. But you can detect some of the same sense of pride when he talks about his bond with the fans Stateside. The way his team played in the World Cup, especially in those thrilling wins over Paraguay, Australia and Bosnia and Herzogovina, was integral to generating a sense of public momentum behind his team. Pochettino feels that his team helped to “change the view” of the American public, to feel that soccer is no longer “a boring game.”

“I think, through our messaging for nearly two years, people started to buy that this is completely different,” he said. “You can feel proud to be American, to show your flag, your country. It’s a sport that is about being brave. We started to provide them the possibility to see that sport in a different way. They started to see in a different way, they started to buy the idea. Amazing.”

The U.S. campaign ended in controversy and disappointment, though, with Folarin Balogun’s overturned suspension dominating the build-up to the last-16 game, in which Belgium was clearly the superior side. Pochettino denied again that it was why the U.S. lost. “What I don’t like is to put an excuse,” he said, “Belgium was much better.”

This is a delicate political matter, and Pochettino acknowledged that it was a “rare” and “unique” situation, but pointed out that this was not the only time FIFA overturned a suspension for this World Cup. Cristiano Ronaldo got the same treatment, too.

But there is now a chance to start fresh, with plenty to play for over the next four years. There will be a Concacaf Gold Cup next year and potentially a Copa America the year after, which would help to fill the buildup to the 2030 World Cup. But Pochettino also made clear that while his first contract, leading up to this summer, was unbreakable, this situation is slightly different.

Simply put, there are circumstances under which he could leave between now and June 2030.

“Now it’s a four-year contract, it’s different,” Pochettino said. “We can next season lose the Copa America, or the Gold Cup, and they’re not happy with us, they can sack us. Or we can say ‘OK, it’s not the way that we think.’ Four years is different. Maybe now if someone calls in the future, it’s a different type (of situation). We are excited, we are thinking to spend four years, to the next World Cup. But now it’s a long period.”

But before any of that, Pochettino is ready for the USMNT’s four high-interest friendlies this forthcoming international break, against Peru, Chile, Mexico and Canada. It already feels very different from Pochettino’s start in the job, when it was a struggle to always get U.S. fans into home games. But this was always part of the attraction, “to make history, to change football there.”

After so much time working in club football, this is why the international game is so appealing. “It’s more pure,” Pochettino said, because the players are more motivated and less distracted. “The players are not toxic, they come because they want to enjoy, they want to enjoy, they don’t have time to become upset or disappointed.” And for Pochettino, who sees himself as a manager born in an analogue era, now working in a digital one, it allows him to build those human relations, to work on the chemistry of football, that means so much to him.

While Pochettino and his staff were working hard to prepare the U.S. for the World Cup, Tottenham, the club closest to his heart, was in crisis. The appointment of Thomas Frank had not worked and Spurs were, in the winter and spring of last season, heading for relegation. For many fans, Pochettino was the saviour, the king over the water, and his name was often sung last season, including during Frank’s final game, a 2-1 defeat to Newcastle United in February.

There have been various points in recent years when it felt as if a Pochettino return to Tottenham might happen. Perhaps the closest was in May 2021, when there was a push at Spurs to bring him back, only for PSG to say no, just six months after Pochettino started there. Then two years later, after Pochettino had left PSG but before he signed for Chelsea, there was plenty of public enthusiasm for him to return, but no approach from Spurs chairman Daniel Levy. And then most recently earlier this year, when Pochettino says that he got a call about the Tottenham job, but at a moment when his full focus was on the World Cup. There was never any prospect of his walking out before the tournament.

“The problem was that the timings were never the best,” Pochettino said. “When I was free, I never received a contact. And then when I was working, I received a contact, but I cannot make the decision to come back. It was a little bit unlucky. Maybe one day the stars will align, and it can happen. But the problem was that when we wanted and we were free, we didn’t receive the approach. When we were working, we received the approach.”

In the end, Spurs sacked Frank in February, tried and failed to get Roberto De Zerbi, appointed Igor Tudor and then sacked him when De Zerbi became persuadable to take the job. And the only way to get someone of De Zerbi’s calibre was with a five-year contract. “They were under pressure to bring another coach, to give him the possibility to stay for a long period like happened with De Zerbi,” Pochettino explained. “It was an obvious situation.”

Pochettino joked that there was nothing special about him getting a call. “In this moment they called everyone, they called all the coaches! Free and not free!” But when De Zerbi signed that deal in March, the prospect of Pochettino taking over even after the World Cup was gone. But Pochettino leaves no doubt that he would have been delighted to take over had he not been committed to the U.S. “If I was free, of course I come,” he said. “But I wasn’t free, I was preparing for the World Cup.”

During this period of uncertainty there was a question about what Spurs would do if they were relegated, and who might manage them in the Championship. In the end it remained a hypothetical. But Pochettino does not mind this sort of speculation, and he jumped at the chance to clear it up. So would he have taken it in the second tier? “Yes of course,” he said. “It’s the only club that always I am open to help. Whatever division. Another club, no. But Tottenham, yes.”

Clearly that connection for Pochettino is as strong as ever. (That in part is why he believes that Tottenham ought to be awarded the 2016-17 Premier League title, given Chelsea’s breaches of rules over payments between 2009 and 2022.) But he also knows Tottenham is a very different place from the club he left in 2019. In part because Levy, who ran everything at Spurs throughout Pochettino’s tenure, was dismissed one year ago. Pochettino and Levy are still close. And so it was with genuine kindness rather than any schadenfreude that Pochettino said that Levy must now know what it is like to be sacked, with the sudden switch-off that implies.

“Now he knows the feeling,” Pochettino said. “The way that I felt in this moment, that we felt, you receive the letter, you are sacked, pick up your things and you can never come back. And the people, maybe 200, 300 people that were your family, you cannot say goodbye, you cannot send a text, you cannot do nothing. That was really, really tough for me. I was talking with him about that. Of course I am not happy that now he feels the same. Because I am not a person who has bad feelings. I am so sorry for him and for everyone.”

The post-Levy changes at Tottenham led to the club embarking on their boldest transfer window, spending more money on fees and wages this summer than ever before. It is a far cry from the era during which Pochettino worked, when Tottenham famously did not sign a single player in the 2018 summer window. But Pochettino’s love for Tottenham, his enthusiasm for them to do well, means that he is pleased that De Zerbi has this opportunity to build the team that he wants.

“I am happy if Tottenham now have the possibility to spend and to bring proven players, who have already played in the Premier League,” he said. “It’s good for the club. Because after the last two or three years, what the club is trying to find, is to improve, and not suffer. Now it’s about performing. I am happy because I feel Tottenham. It’s still my club and I want the best for them. And if that happens, it’s good. I’d be so happy for the fans and for the people.”

Tottenham’s Mykhailo Mudryk suffers ankle injury, expected to be out until after internationals

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Tottenham’s Mykhailo Mudryk suffers ankle injury, expected to be out until after internationals - The New York Times
Description

Tottenham Hotspur loanee Mykhailo Mudryk has suffered an ankle injury in training and is expected to be sidelined until after the September international break.

Spurs signed the Ukrainian on a season-long loan from rivals Chelsea on summer transfer deadline day and he made his first competitive appearance in 646 days as a substitute in their 0-0 draw with Nottingham Forest on Saturday.

But Mudryk’s chances of settling quickly in north London have been dealt a blow after he picked up an ankle injury in training.

The 25-year-old is expected to be sidelined until after the internationals, which would rule him out of Tottenham’s home league games against Everton and Aston Villa, which fall either side of the Carabao Cup third-round tie at Liverpool.

Mudryk had not played competitively since November 2024 when he joined Spurs, having been banned for 20 months for breaching the Football Association’s (FA) doping rules.

On July 31, a resolution between the FA and the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) was reached over an anti-doping violation, allowing Mudryk to return to club training and selection.

The 25-year-old had to train away from all Chelsea facilities on his own during that 20-month period, having returned an adverse finding in a urine sample. He was provisionally suspended and then handed a four-year ban by the FA in April this year, a verdict he lodged an appeal against to the Court of Arbitration for Sport.

Spurs are currently without forwards Wilson Odobert and Xavi Simons, who are recovering from anterior cruciate ligament injuries, while James Maddison has missed the last two matches with a shoulder complaint. Richarlison has been left out of the club’s Premier League squad.

But Dejan Kulusevski is back in full training in a boost to head coach Roberto De Zerbi, while the club boosted their forward options with the signings of Savio and Omar Marmoush from Manchester City during the window.

What does this mean for Mudryk and Spurs?

It’s a frustrating start to life in north London for Mudryk, who Tottenham recruited on deadline day to provide depth at left wing.

Mudryk was signed to compete with Mathys Tel on the left of De Zerbi’s attack, after Spurs were beaten to the signing of Iliman Ndiaye by Manchester City.

Having not played competitive football since scoring in Chelsea’s 2-0 win over Heidenheim in the Conference League in November 2024, there was an acceptance that it would take Mudryk a while to get up to speed, but after De Zerbi handed him an opportunity from the bench against Nottingham Forest on the weekend, it suggested the Italian, who coached Mudryk at Shakhtar Donetsk, was willing to fast-track his involvement with the team.

While the Ukraine international did not make much of an impact in his short cameo from the bench against Forest, he did provide a slight glimmer of what he could offer De Zerbi’s side from the left this season, winning a free-kick on the edge of the box after dribbling past his marker.

His injury leaves De Zerbi slightly short of left-wing options, with Tel, whom the coach said “takes too many wrong decisions”, competing with Omar Marmoush for a starting spot.

As for Mudryk, it represents yet another frustrating setback. He will have undoubtedly harboured ambitions of returning to the Ukraine national team over the international break, but this injury will prevent that.

And with Tottenham preparing to travel to Liverpool in the Carabao Cup next week — a game he could have been in line to start or play significant minutes in — he will have to wait longer than planned to make a real impact in Spurs colours.

However, with just two league games remaining before the extended international break, Mudryk has time without a run of matches to recover.

In raising their technical ceiling, Tottenham have left themselves short of physicality

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
In raising their technical ceiling, Tottenham have left themselves short of physicality - The Athletic - The New York Times
Description

In his post-match press conference after his Tottenham Hotspur side were convincingly beaten by Brentford on the opening weekend of the new Premier League season, with the home side scoring their final goal of a 3-0 win from a corner, Roberto De Zerbi brushed off the suggestion that set pieces and a lack of physicality in the team would be a persistent concern beyond that game.

“Listen, Brentford, in set pieces, are maybe the best team in the Premier League,” the Italian said. “So it’s normal to suffer. I think we suffer(ed) more in the duels, more in the second ball, than in the set pieces.”

A week later, in Tottenham’s first home fixture of the campaign, Newcastle United got their second goal of a 2-0 win from a corner. Like at Brentford’s Gtech Stadium, Spurs failed to win with the first contact from a deep corner, allowing the ball to be headed across their penalty area to an unmarked Yoane Wissa, who acrobatically converted past Antonin Kinsky.

These moments represent a marked departure from last season, when set pieces were one of the few things Tottenham consistently did well.

Set-pieces coach Andreas Georgson was the mastermind behind their effectiveness from dead-ball situations, with the club scoring 19 of their 48 league goals via that route — the highest percentage in the Premier League (39.6 per cent). Spurs were also incredibly effective at keeping sides out from them, finishing second to Arsenal in set-piece goals conceded (nine). At just 15.8 per cent of the total (nine of 57), they were also the division’s best defence from set pieces relative to their total number of goals conceded.

The 0-0 draw away to Nottingham Forest on matchday three at the weekend was a step in the right direction in the wider sense, keeping a clean sheet and earning their first point of the season, but Tottenham remain ineffective in both boxes in set-piece situations.

As spoils of their territory and possession, the visitors won 10 corners but created just one chance, an awkward Micky van de Ven header from close range which he could not direct goalwards. With last season’s squad, a team in which strength and power in both midfield and defence were not in short supply, Spurs would typically have fashioned more from these opportunities.

In recruiting players to execute De Zerbi’s style over the summer, they have lost an edge in the physicality department — a potential flaw when you consider the Premier League today is perhaps more physical than it has been since the turn of the century.

Tottenham’s local north London rivals Arsenal became Premier League champions in May on the back of their set-piece dominance, while last season’s second- and third-placed sides Manchester City and Manchester United have both spent big since to solidify their midfields with athletes.

Of the 10 players Spurs recruited in the transfer window just ended, it’s difficult to argue that any have a stellar reputation for their aerial ability, including Tosin Adarabioyo and Jan Paul van Hecke, despite them being centre-backs listed as 6ft 5in (195cm) and 6ft 2in (188cm) tall, respectively.

While De Zerbi references Brentford as an almost-unique case regarding aerial and set-piece capability, a glance down the table leaves you wondering if any other clubs have not been built their teams with dead-ball situations in mind.

Tottenham fielded the fifth-shortest starting XI in the Premier League at the weekend (an average of 183.1 cm — just over 6ft), but height is far from the only factor.

Club captain Cristian Romero departed for Atletico Madrid in the summer, having been among Spurs’ best players in both boxes over recent seasons; Joao Palhinha scored five Premier League goals during his year on loan from Bayern Munich, including the decisive one in the 1-0 win against Everton on the final day — he is now at Benfica; Richarlison netted 11 times in the Premier League, and was often the man positioned to make the first contact at defensive corners and other set pieces; then head coach Ange Postecoglou hailed Kevin Danso as a player who “enjoys the whacks”, and the Austrian defender described himself as a “warrior” after signing for Sunderland on deadline day last week.

These players were arguably Tottenham’s most dominant physical profiles and headers of the ball last term. All are now either gone or, in Richarlison’s case, unavailable in the Premier League, having been left out of De Zerbi’s official squad.

His team selection against Forest suggests the head coach is cognizant of Tottenham’s declining effectiveness as a set-piece animal.

Conor Gallagher was a surprise pick in the starting XI, preferred to £85million summer signing Mateus Fernandes, with De Zerbi referencing how he knows English football better and that he was aiming to find the “right balance” in the team. The day before, De Zerbi namechecked Gallagher as a player who can help his team from a set pieces and physicality perspective.

“We have the centre-backs with physicality,” he said. ”Listen, to defend the set pieces, first of all, you have to have blood and the right speed to defend. Because, sometimes, it’s the duel. You have not to lose all duels because you are smaller than the opponent. We have Allan Dixon (the club’s beefy player liaison officer). We put Allan Dixon in the set pieces on the pitch, if you want?

“But I think if you do not have the spirit to fight in duels — this part makes the difference. Also, the structure, the physicality, for sure. But we have Van Hecke, Van de Ven, (Destiny) Udogie, (Rodrigo) Bentancur and (Dominic) Solanke (as options). Gallagher is very good in the set pieces. Why? Because he fights.”

But perhaps falling short in some areas, at least in the early stages of De Zerbi’s rebuild, is an inevitable trade-off as he prioritises others.

Notably, Spurs amassed 10 corners against Forest, something they did in the league only four times last season before his appointment at the end of March (the fifth and final occasion was in the 1-1 draw with Leeds United in May), reflecting how they are improving in sustaining pressure in the opposition team’s half.

In a standout display, Bentancur was at the heart of everything good about Tottenham at the City Ground, bringing a maturity and tactical discipline to the midfield. And with the aforementioned outgoings, the Uruguay international is also probably Tottenham’s best player in the air now, rendering him near-undroppable.

Another of the newcomers, Sandro Tonali, was improved, looking closer to the athletic level required to play in the Premier League than he did against Brentford, and Spurs are now stacked with talent, if potentially a little short on evidence of Premier League production, in the final third.

In transitioning the team from physical to technical, De Zerbi is, in theory, raising the ceiling.

Last season, set pieces propped the floor up just above the relegation precipice. To keep it there, he may have to divert more attention to ensuring the 2026-27 version of Tottenham have the robustness to compete in what’s become a hyper-physical Premier League.

Tottenham rebuilt their midfield for £185m but Rodrigo Bentancur is the first pick right now

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Tottenham rebuilt their midfield for £185m but Rodrigo Bentancur is the first pick right now - The New York Times
Description

This summer Tottenham Hotspur bought Sandro Tonali from Newcastle United in a deal that could be worth £100m ($133m) and Mateus Fernandes from West Ham United for £85m. In January, they saw off competition to sign Conor Gallagher from Atletico Madrid for £34m. Last summer they bought Xavi Simons — currently recovering from a knee injury — from RB Leipzig for £51.8m to play as the No 10.

A lot of money, then, has been thrown at the Tottenham midfield conundrum over the past year or so, not just in fees but in salaries to attract these players to the club.

And yet right now it feels as if perhaps the most important midfielder, the one who has to play, is someone who has been at the club far longer.

It was Rodrigo Bentancur who got the most fulsome praise from Roberto De Zerbi on Saturday evening after Spurs had emerged from the trip to Nottingham Forest with a 0-0 draw, their first point and first clean sheet of the league season. “Great game, great game,” De Zerbi said of the Uruguayan, who had just made his third consecutive start and given his best performance of the season.

Over the course of the afternoon, Bentancur had shown again that Tottenham do not have anyone quite like him in the middle of the pitch. His awareness, understanding and ability to read the game faster than anyone else, was integral to Spurs stopping Forest from attacking through the middle.

That special sense he has, that picture in his head, also makes Bentancur integral when Tottenham have the ball and are trying to move it forward. There is no one better at showing for the ball, receiving a pass to feet from the centre-backs and, under pressure, bouncing it first time out to a full-back. (Remember when Spurs went to Forest last season, Archie Gray took an extra touch in precisely that position, Ibrahim Sangare stole the ball and Forest went 1-0 up.)

The fascinating thing about Bentancur’s role right now is that at the start of the season fans might not have expected him to play such an important part. The expectation was that Tonali and Fernandes would be first choice in the middle of the pitch, with Gallagher likely to continue in the No 10 role he held at the end of last season. Spurs turned down big money for Lucas Bergvall this summer, but given that they decided to keep him, he was set for a prominent role too. James Maddison, who recovered enough from a knee injury to play at the end of last season, has also been knocking at the door.

But as De Zerbi has tried to find the right combination so far this season, he has turned to Bentancur three times out of four. At Brentford on the opening day, it was Tonali, Bergvall and Gallagher, but those three were unable to cope with the physicality of their hosts. It was only when Fernandes and Bentancur came on that Spurs got any sort of foothold, but they were already out of the game.

So when Spurs hosted Charlton Athletic in the League Cup, Bentancur came in, anchoring for Bergvall and Fernandes to get forward. And — against a much-changed Championship side — they comfortably won 5-1. Bentancur then kept his place for the Newcastle game, alongside Tonali and Fernandes, when Spurs started well but were unable to sustain it and were eventually picked off to lose 2-0. And then again on Saturday, with Tonali and Gallagher.

Of course, at this stage of the season it is only natural there will be some rotation, some experimentation, as De Zerbi tries out new players and different combinations, attempting to find the right balance in the middle of the pitch. This is a fairly new team after all. At the same time, no one is better suited to the anchoring job, the role that allows other players to shine, than Bentancur. It almost feels as if the formula is Bentancur plus two others, at least until they have more attacking options at No 10.

But maybe this should not be so much of a surprise. Bentancur has made himself one of the great survivors of this Spurs squad. Behind the unique Ben Davies, now into his 13th season at the club, Bentancur is the joint longest-serving outfield player. He arrived at the end of the January 2022 transfer window, Fabio Paratici picking him and Dejan Kulusevski up on the cheap from Juventus (Bentancur only cost £15m, Kulusevski joined on an 18-month loan that was made permanent in 2023).

We are not far from the fifth anniversary of Bentancur’s arrival, and over that time he has made 151 Spurs appearances. Remember that he started off as half of the two-man engine room for Antonio Conte, driving Spurs towards their last top-four finish in his first few months at the club. He missed most of 2023 with an anterior cruciate ligament injury, and when he came back, found himself playing a very different style under Ange Postecoglou. But he became an integral player again during Postecoglou’s second season, anchoring the team during the injury crisis, starting six of Spurs’ seven Europa League knockout games. He was as important as anyone in lifting the trophy in Bilbao, again showing the value of his experience and awareness in those huge games at the end of the season.

And even last year, Bentancur started the season playing alongside Joao Palhinha for Thomas Frank, with people wondering whether those two together could ever make the team progressive enough in the middle of the pitch. Bentancur missed three months in the middle of the season with a hamstring injury and yet when he returned, his value to the group was clearer than ever. And it was with Bentancur and Palhinha reunited in the middle for the final games that Spurs stayed up. The same nous and game intelligence that helped to lift the Europa League contributed to keeping Spurs in the Premier League in 2026.

There may always be midfield options who excite people more, who are more eye-catching or faster or more incisive. Yet Bentancur has found time and time again over the past five years that managers usually want him on the pitch. So many of his former team-mates have left the club in the intervening period and yet the 29-year-old remains, one of the last links to an era that has been moved away from at pace. Until anyone else can match his experience and football brain, he will remain as important as ever.

Nottingham Forest 0 Tottenham 0 – When will De Zerbi’s re-tooled attack click?

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Nottingham Forest 0 Tottenham 0 – When will De Zerbi’s re-tooled attack click? - The New York Times
Description

Tottenham Hotspur drew 0-0 at Nottingham Forest, registering their first point of the Premier League season.

Spurs had chances to win the game, with Omar Marmoush’s effort in the first half, which he dragged wide of Matz Sels’ post, the outstanding opportunity. Forest had chances of their own, with the crowd incensed at referee Craig Pawson and VAR Peter Banks after they ruled out a Neco Williams goal for a handball offence.

The Athletic’s Elias Burke assesses the action…

When will Tottenham’s attack click?

Tottenham’s trip to the City Ground was both a meaningful step in the right direction and a painful missed opportunity.

Spurs were impressive in the first period, without threatening Matz Sels’ goal — a trend across the match, with Tottenham failing to register a shot on target in the 90 minutes. Marmoush really should have, though, after he was played in on goal by Pedro Porro, but the Egypt international dragged his shot wide. He had another opportunity in the second period, but fired wildly over.

Despite spending big on attacking reinforcements, the attack is still yet to click. Part of that is rustiness, with Savio’s pre-season preparations interrupted by the transfer saga, and Marmoush yet to build chemistry with a bunch of forwards who have spent time on the sidelines. It is up to De Zerbi to address that, and it will take time, though it’s hard to see Marmoush receiving passes in the build-up with bigger defenders in close pursuit as a sustainably effective tactic. It marks the first time they haven’t scored in the first three league games since 1974.

However, Tottenham did keep their first clean sheet of the season, and the issues relating to mentality, lack of aggressiveness, and fitness did not rear their ugly heads. Sandro Tonali delivered his most convincing performance in midfield yet, covering ground, tackling well, and driving attacks forward in transition. At the same time, the defence marshalled Liam Delap, and later Igor Jesus, well.

But Forest are in transition under Oliver Glasner too, and Tottenham had opportunities to make their territory pay, but did not manage it. De Zerbi should be pleased enough about a performance which could have easily resulted in a win, but there is still much to be done.

How was Savio on his Premier League debut for Spurs?

Tottenham fans have had to wait a week longer than expected to see Savio in the Premier League, after he was sidelined with minor muscle fatigue for last week’s 2-0 defeat to Newcastle United.

Anticipation of Savio in a Tottenham shirt had been building throughout the summer, with the Brazil international making no secret of his intention to join Roberto De Zerbi’s ranks this summer, seemingly liking and commenting on almost every post in relation to the north London club on social media. The excitement was ratcheted up another notch after his impressive cameo in the 5-1 Carabao Cup win against Charlton, where he came off the bench and scored, before inadvertently setting up another for team-mate Ben Davies.

And his first league outing for Spurs was promising. The right wing position has been a major issue for Tottenham since Mohammed Kudus went down with a hamstring injury in January. De Zerbi resorted to using natural striker Randal Kolo Muani and midfielder Conor Gallagher in that position, and the fit looked awkward at best. Without truly threatening Sels’ goal or creating any outstanding opportunities, it was apparent Savio is a natural and accomplished winger with pace and trickery, capable of hurting the opposition.

It was an encouraging debut from the 22-year-old before he was replaced near the hour mark by Kudus, but there’s surely a lot more to come.

Are Spurs lacking a true No 10?

De Zerbi has something of a midfield dilemma.

The Italian has frequently employed a 4-2-3-1 formation throughout his coaching career, and did so to good effect last term as he navigated Tottenham away from the drop. This season, however, his midfield options may work better in a different configuration.

For the second week running, De Zerbi has opted for Rodrigo Bentancur to partner Sandro Tonali in midfield, with one of Mateus Fernandes or Conor Gallagher operating ahead as a No 10. This week, Gallagher got the nod, but the issues with a lack of creativity and central progression persisted.

While De Zerbi has talked up Gallagher’s capabilities as a No 10 and noted Fernandes started his career at Sporting Club of Portugal as an advanced midfielder, neither player is a natural in that position. Kudus can also play there, but has played more frequently as a wide player in the Premier League. So while De Zerbi awaits the inclusion of James Maddison, who may take a while to get up to speed to start games after missing most of pre-season, and the return of Xavi Simons from an ACL injury sustained in April, perhaps Spurs will find more penetration in midfield with either Gallagher or Fernandes dropping slightly deeper. This could allow them to get on the ball and feed an attack with the talent to receive passes between the lines.

What did De Zerbi say?

We will bring you this after he has spoken at the post-match press conference.

What next for Spurs?

Foodchained, alpha targets and bombas: Explaining the new transfer jargon

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Foodchained, alpha targets and bombas: Explaining the new transfer jargon - The New York Times
Description

Sometimes a ‘big’ signing isn’t enough. If you are Tottenham Hotspur head coach Roberto De Zerbi, teasing a “bomba” signing is what gets fans excited. Or how about acquiring an “alpha” target?

This summer’s transfer window saw an unprecedented £3.5billion ($4.7bn) spent by Premier League teams, and with this lavish spending has come a new terminology for transfers.

Teams were “foodchained” as there was plenty of business between Premier League clubs, while one side entered a “2.0” era.

Let’s dissect some of the jargon that defined this bonkers summer 2026 transfer window.

Foodchained

Foodchained is usually when a player leaves to join a ‘bigger’ club, or one with greater pull and financial power.

The term is of course patronising, and is often used humorously on football X, but this summer it has definitely caught on, and has been used to describe moves by the likes of Morgan Rogers, Sandro Tonali, Carlos Baleba and Bruno Guimaraes to the Premier League’s big six.

But ‘Big Six’ teams also have their own hierarchy. It would be fair to say Manchester City ‘foodchained’ Tottenham Hotspur to sign Iliman Ndiaye, after the player preferred to join Enzo Maresca’s team when both clubs reached an agreement with Everton.

Not every transfer counts. Take a backup goalkeeper transfer or the offloading of an unpopular/underperforming player. The term works best when the player on the move is important to their team, perhaps a fan favourite, but has buckled at the idea of joining (insert ‘bigger’ club).

Bomba

Tottenham Hotspur head coach Roberto De Zerbi delivered a memorable line this summer when he told reporters in late July that Spurs were working on a “bomba” signing. This was at the height of Tottenham’s excitement in the transfer window, after they had just splashed club-record fees on Sandro Tonali and Mateus Fernandes.

The Italian described a “bomba” as a “top player”.

“I think Tonali, Mateus Fernandes, Senesi, Robertson are bomba,” he said. “For me, top player for us.” Bomba in Italian literally means a bomb, making a big bang with a signing.

Spurs later signed Savio, but was he the anticipated “bomba”? Could it have been Omar Marmoush or Tosin Adarabioyo? Or even Mykhailo Mudryk?

Alpha target

If signing a “bomba” doesn’t get you excited, how about an “alpha” target?

One Newcastle United insider described their €60million (£51.4m, $69.6m) deadline-day signing of Matias Fernandez-Pardo from Lille as their “alpha” target. The 21-year-old forward scored eight goals in 29 Ligue 1 appearances last season.

Speaking in normal terms, this means Newcastle had tracked Fernandez-Pardo over the long term and would have moved for him sooner, but believed the player was unattainable.

Let’s hope Newcastle are not deep in the manosphere, but rather fans of the Greek alphabet — of which alpha is the first letter.

Re-hijack

Sunderland completed the €30million (£25.8m; $34.9m) signing of Lyon forward Malick Fofana on deadline day.

It wasn’t without jeopardy, as they had to ‘re-hijack’ their own deal.

After Sunderland had initially agreed a fee with Lyon, Crystal Palace tried to hijack the move and struck a deal with the French club.

Palace’s new manager, Pierre Sage, coached Lyon between 2023 and 2025 and called his former player Fofana on Tuesday morning in an attempt to convince him to move to south London instead. In response, Sunderland upped their offer to the player and agent.

With time running out to get the deal done, both clubs agreed to sanction a joint medical and sent private jets to France, awaiting transport for the player to either London or the north east.

Kyril Louis-Dreyfus, the chairman and majority owner of Sunderland, also flew to Lyon to meet with the player.

The decision came down to Fofana’s preference, and the 21-year-old Belgium international informed Sunderland of his intention to sign with them at 9pm on Tuesday, allowing the club to submit a dealsheet before the 11pm deadline.

Need a positive spin for a complete reshuffle of your team in one window? Try calling it ‘2.0’.

Newcastle might have lost several of their key players this summer, including Tonali, Guimaraes, Kieran Trippier and Anthony Gordon, and become frustrated at missing out on targets to other clubs. But the result is not a reduced side. It is “Newcastle 2.0”, according to CEO David Hopkinson.

They have had an impressive start in the Premier League and look to have a clear identity under new head coach Matthias Jaissle, targeting hungry young players in the transfer window.

Yes, the club has existed since 1881 and so has undoubtedly had more than two changes of style before. But the optics of rebranding the team as Newcastle 2.0, under ownership which joined in 2021, seem to have helped keep morale high during the hectic transfer window.

Aston Villa, who have signed 10 players after losing the core of their Europa League-winning side, have instead called it a “new generation” for their club.