The Mag

The question we were asking on Wednsday was – As a Newcastle United fan, would you rather see Spurs or West Ham relegated?

As Newcastle United fans, if you had to choose, would you rather Spurs fans or West Ham supporters experienced the misery in 10 days time?

Until very recently, it had looked as though at least one or two more clubs could be in this relegation fight to the bitter end.

However, after the latest round of fixtures it is now only the two contenders.

That late Elliot Anderson goal against Newcastle United meant that Nottingham Forest ended up safe after the weekend.

Now with only two rounds of Premier League games remaining, West Ham trail Spurs by two points.

The relegation fight won’t be concluded on Sunday (17 May) BUT the result of Newcastle United v West Ham United could prove a decisive moment. That is then followed by Chelsea v Spurs on Tuesday 19 May.

Before then on the final day of the season, on Sunday 24 May, it is Spurs v Everton and West Ham v Leeds.

We just thought we would gauge what Newcastle United fans were thinking about this in advance of the Hammers match at St James’ Park.

So here are the final results, which club NUFC fans would prefer to see relegated…

A resounding verdict!

Many thanks to everybody who took the time to vote.

As ever, I enjoyed reading Jamie Smith’s latest contribution to The Mag (Schadenfreude, integrity, etc). Citing financial reasons, he declares that “the best result in the long term for Newcastle United on Sunday is for West Ham to win”.

Such a result would pile yet more pressure on Tottenham in the relegation dog fight, while ending our disappointing Premier League season with a dismal eighth home defeat.

There is, however, a way to avoid this unpleasant scenario of almost hoping we are beaten — without letting Spurs off the hook on which most of our fans would presumably like to see them impaled.

The two London clubs each have two games remaining. After Monday night’s draw against Leeds, Spurs go to Stamford Bridge next Tuesday, then host Everton on the final day.

West Ham are at home to Leeds that day, a week after playing at St James’ Park.

This is where things become tricky for somebody who failed maths O-level three times before taking the hint and concentrating on words rather than numbers.

Spurs are two points clear of the drop. If they lose their final two games and West Ham lose to us but beat Leeds, by my reckoning Spurs are down.

Would you honestly expect them to leave Stamford Bridge with anything except a bruising defeat?

Honesty is important here because, after the season Chelsea have endured, they are almost as much of a basket case as Spurs. Who knows which version of the King’s Road Strollers will put on a show in front of their frustrated supporters?

They will, presumably, fight tooth and nail at Wembley on Saturday in the FA Cup final. The fear is that, three days later, they will reprise their recent performance at the Amex, an appalling capitulation that cost Liam Rosenior his job.

With my glass half-full, I can see Chelsea doing enough to embarrass Spurs. After all, the hosts are the reigning Fifa Club World c Cup champions (ahem). There is no love lost between these outfits. Only a decade ago, the Battle of Stamford Bridge essentially ended the Cockerels’ hopes of a first top-tier title since 1961.

Chelsea have won 12 and drawn the other two of their 14 most recent Premier League matches against Spurs, home and away.

If my wishes come true, Spurs will start their not-so-super Sunday stuck on 38 points. West Ham will be on 36. Winner takes all, if their closest rivals lose.

Against Everton, Spurs would need to avoid defeat, because a point and their superior goal difference would scupper West Ham, whatever happened at the London Stadium.

How likely are Spurs to gain a single point? Not very. They have lost 10 of 18 home matches in the Premier League this season, drawn six and won two.

Everton will, all things being equal, have stuffed Sunderland in their penultimate match while we are beating West Ham. That would give the Toffees something to play for on the final day; the prospect of a Europa Conference League campaign next season.

That has been called a poisoned chalice on this forum but David Moyes won it with West Ham in 2023 and would doubtless love to do it again with Everton.

I can almost hear his pre-match talk: “C’mon, lads, who disnae fancy a Thursday night in Azerbaijan, Moldova or Kazahkstan? Let’s get at these fancy dans from the start!”

Rest assured, the Toffees will be up for it.

What of Leeds, whom West Ham must beat to survive the drop? Daniel Farke’s team have done well in the second half of the season and are unbeaten in the league since March 3.

They will be no pushovers. The Hammers have home advantage, however, and know that nothing but three points are essential. Those factors could prove decisive by 6pm on May 24.

So much for my crystal ball, which is ever so slightly clouded by wishful thinking.

Playing devil’s advocate, there are a few reasons to hope Spurs survive. Newcastle United have an excellent Premier League record against them. No game is ever easy but a match against the Cockerels comes pretty damn close. If we play them next season, that should be six points in the bag. Just the 34 more from 36 games to ease the relegation fears that are already on the mind of some Toon Army comrades.

Yes, Spurs did lure away Gazza and the Waddler in their prime, though the north Londoners were also canny enough to give us £850,000 for Kevin Scott in 1994 and £30m for Moussa Sissoko in 2016. Taa very much, don’t mind if we do!

Jamie Smith rightly points out that our annual income is nearly £240m lower than theirs in the most recent figures and the demise of any member of the “Big Six” has to be good news.

Perhaps a stay of execution, followed by a conclusive and costly collapse next season, would be a happy compromise.

No, let’s get rid of them now. Their owners did everything possible to delay and derail the Saudi PIF takeover, they wanted to join a European Super League, they deserve every horrible humiliation that comes their way.

As in all such cases, the supporters, those who are emotionally invested in a club, are the ones who suffer most. I have long-lasting friendships with fans of Spurs and West Ham. They commiserated with me in 2009 and 2016. Soon it will be my turn to reciprocate.

The question we are asking today is – As a Newcastle United fan, would you rather see Spurs or West Ham relegated?

I think that is the right way of phrasing it, as opposed to which of them you want to stay up…

As Newcastle United fans, if you had to choose, would you rather Spurs fans or West Ham supporters experienced the misery in 11 days time?

Until very recently, it had looked as though at least one or two more clubs could be in this relegation fight to the bitter end.

However, after the weekend it is now only the two contenders.

That late Elliot Anderson goal against Newcastle United meant that Nottingham Forest ended up safe after the weekend.

Now with only two rounds of Premier League games remaining, West Ham trail Spurs by two points.

The relegation fight won’t be concluded on Sunday (17 May) BUT the result of Newcastle United v West Ham United could prove a decisive moment. That is then followed by Chelsea v Spurs on Tuesday 19 May.

Before on the final day of the season, on Sunday 24 May, it is Spurs v Everton and West Ham v Leeds.

We just thought we would gauge what Newcastle United fans were thinking about this and will publish the poll result on Thursday, in advance of the Hammers match at St James’ Park.

So please choose from the two options below, what fits best with how you think.

Many thanks for taking the time to vote.

For me personally, VAR has sucked all the excitement out of celebrating a goal.

It has destroyed the instinctive reaction that used to follow the sight of the ball hitting the back of the net. The cursory glance at the linesman before going mental is long gone.

Even though I’m still off my feet, in that precise moment the celebration is hesitant, with thoughts immediately turning to VAR.

What follows is an anxious wait that lasts more than a few moments, with the need to look around the stadium, a glance up to the big screen before checking the opposition players and the referee for the tell-tale sign that a VAR check is coming.

Sometimes these checks don’t materialise and it’s back to celebrating and you might argue a goal is a goal, but it’s just not the same.

I wrote an article for the Mag published three years ago when commenting on the VAR debacle at the Tottenham Hotspur stadium after Luis Diaz’ perfectly good goal was disallowed because of the breakdown in communications involving Darren England, who was the Video Assistant Referee that day.

That name will be familiar to most of us because it was Darren England on VAR duty at Stockley Park last Sunday, when he asked referee Chris Kavanagh to take a closer look at the infringement on Arsenal keeper David Raya in the aftermath of former Newcastle United striker Callum Wilson’s late equaliser in West Ham’s home game against the Gunners.

The wild celebrations for the Happy Hammers were shortlived, the moment cruelly extinguished by VAR.

The stakes were incredibly high. Arsenal clinging onto all three points and barring a calamitous end to the season, they will surely be crowned Premier League champions on Sunday week.

West Ham meanwhile, denied a crucial point, knowing that even maximum points from their remaining fixtures against Newcastle United and Leeds may not be sufficient in their quest to avoid the drop.

Was it a foul? Maybe. Were there other infringements happening simultaneously? Definitely.

The real point here is inconsistent application of the laws of the game, together with more than a hint of irony.

One-third of Arsenal’s league goals have come in a not too dissimilar fashion to the goal that Callum Wilson was so cruelly denied, with the constant grappling, pushing, pulling and wrestling going unchecked. Fair to say that Arsenal have become adept at crowding and surrounding goalkeepers at corners, to score from set-pieces.

I read on the BBC Sport site: “For all the talk about jostling and pushing, West Ham’s is the only goal to be ruled out for it on VAR review this season.”

I was also reminded that Arsenal scored perfectly legitimate goals against Man Utd and Aston Villa earlier in the season despite William Saliba and Gabriel impeding both goalkeepers. And West Ham’s Pablo had been at it as recently as April, clearly putting his arm across Jordan Pickford when Thomas Soucek was the beneficiary, a game in which the Irons ran out 2-1 winners against Everton.

Back to Pablo last Sunday.

There is a school of thought that him being impeded by Leandro Trossard (who was clearly grabbing the Brazilian around the waist) directly contributed to the forward putting his arm across Raya.

Unprecedented holding and grappling at corners all stems from tweaks made to the Professional Game Match Officials (PGMOL) Competition Guidance Handbook in 2024/25, when the concept of “mutual holding” was deemed “should usually be allowed”, that “not every contact is a foul” and that referees should maintain a “high threshold” for intervention.

It strikes me that the controversy last Sunday was because England and Kavanagh took it upon themselves to enforce the rules in a manner that hadn’t been the case for many months previously.

And even if you think England made the right call to send Kavanagh to the VAR screen, was it clear and obvious? Not for me. Was it the case that Kavanagh had missed the incident? Highly likely, but quite bizarre given the prevailing circumstances that the referee managed to conclude that he’d seen that specific foul, but that he was able to effectively ignore and disregard all of the other incidents that were going on (and fouls being committed).

I am not disputing Pablo had his arm across Raya but such random enforcement of justice is a bit concerning isn’t it?

Is there an agenda to make sure Arsenal lift the title? Or to prevent Spurs from being relegated? If not the former, you might think the latter, when considering the standard of officiating in the first half at the Tottenham Hotspur stadium last night, the referee enforcing the eight second rule against Karl Darlow, which is the first time I can recall that happening in a long while.

Schadenfreude (n): a German word for the feeling of pleasure or satisfaction when something bad happens to someone else.

Come on, we’re all a bit guilty of this sometimes aren’t we?

Even if you’re such a decent person in life that you’ve never indulged even a bit, I bet everyone reading this regularly indulges in the above practice as a football supporter.

I’d double down on this bet that a good 99% of people reading this will have experienced Schadenfreude at the plight of Tottenham Hotspur this season. Keen for another dose as we enter the final days with the erstwhile Super League enthusiasts still a contender for the drop.

In fact, I’d go as far to say that the only people who don’t hold this view are Spurs fans, as well as supporters who have a particular issue with West Ham, either from personal experience or due to a closer rivalry such as Millwall.

The likelihood of this has reduced over the weekend unfortunately, as lucky Arsenal, miserable VAR decisions and the width of a crossbar, saw Tottenham gain a point on the Hammers.

As stated elsewhere, their superior goal difference means that, were Newcastle United to win on Sunday, Spurs would need only a point from two remaining games to stay up. All but game over.

Here’s where the quandary comes up.

What people may not realise is that preferring Spurs to go down is, from a Newcastle perspective, far more than just a case of Schadenfreude. Apologies, but once again I’m going to talk about money.

In this year’s Deloitte football money league, Spurs were 9th in the world, with total revenues of €672.6m (at today’s exchange rates £583.3m) a considerable gap on 17th placed Newcastle who clocked a mere €398.4m (also at today’s exchange rates £345.5m).

Without bleating on about PSR or SCR rules, that fundamentally means they have an additional £237.8m to play with each year. Newcastle have capacity to erode that gap as the slow recovery from Ashley’s commercial damage continues year-on-year, but the bottom line is that Tottenham will remain much wealthier for the foreseeable, in all likelihood until a new stadium is up and running on Tyneside.

In real terms this means that they can afford to spend bigger on transfers and, crucially, on wages. I have to laugh when I read stuff about players supposedly wanting to live in London, like 22 year olds from Brazil are mad for the musical theatre experiences of the West End or a stroll around the British Museum. If someone has a straight choice between Tottenham and Newcastle this summer and he chooses them, the biggest driving factor will be the excess money that can be pushed at both player and agent. Spurs have a surplus of waste that they need to deal with, but both clubs are in need of a fairly extensive summer rebuild and it’s fair to say we may be shopping in a similar aisle.

For me, this has created a paradox. Elliot Anderson’s late equaliser for Forest has as good as ended any hope of slithering into an ill-deserved European place (in spite of the historically low bar set to achieve this). Our pathetic level of ambition for this remaining pair of matches is, for me, to attempt to finish above Sunderland and to claw a few quid in prize money from a slightly higher league position.

Neither of these things are as big a prize as the prospect of flushing Spurs, so unfortunately there is only one conclusion. The best result in the long term for Newcastle United on Sunday is for West Ham to win. Not for spite, or masochism, for the cold hard, cash-driven tragedy that modern football has become.

I’m sure there will be hand wringing in the comments that wanting Newcastle United to lose is the worst thing you can possibly do.

Come the day I am equally sure I won’t be able to actively pursue this. When Newcastle get a corner I’ll be itching for Dan Burn to head it in and I’ll celebrate each goal in Yoane Wissa’s unlikely hat-trick. However, it sticks in the throat that in a season where United couldn’t motivate themselves to beat the tin pots of Bournemouth and Brentford, with a handful of away spectators celebrating in level seven, or the mackems, subjecting us to the gleeful gloatings of the unwashed hordes up there, they might finally find their groove to sicken an army of Hammers occupying those seats. After six months of miserable weekends, it would be very Newcastle to step up when it matters least.

There is of course, integrity.

I don’t expect Newcastle to consciously fail to try in a match and I’d be furious if they did. Everton did a similar dirty on us against Sunderland in 2016 and I’ll never forgive them and much as Spurs’ demise would be welcome, we owe them that.

But in a year where the team has specialised in letting us and themselves down when the clock hits 85 minutes, one last show before a summer reboot would be far from the end of the world, and for reasons way beyond Schadenfreude.

I don’t have too much interest at the top of the Premier League apart from hoping Lego heed is in tears again, the real interest for me is the final relegation spot and who will fill it.

We have six contenders left, mathematically speaking.

Newcastle United are one of those six but it’s highly unlikely to happen for us, so I’m going to trim it down to five.

After the weekend results, in descending Premier League table order we have Leeds, Palace, Forest, Spurs and West Ham.

First up Leeds. Now I think Newcastle have the best fans but this club are close. They back their team every game. The team on the pitch don’t cause us much harm. I remember their chairman angling one comment towards our owners but it wasn’t too much. I hope they stay up.

Crystal Palace are next. They don’t bother me that much and have given me a lot of amusement when they won the FA Cup against Man City. They seem to have put their offensive flag away when we play them so I don’t mind them too much. I don’t mind if they stay up.

Nottingham Forest are just below them. We have some history with Forest, politically with the miners strike and also with a certain pitch invasion in the 70s. Forest don’t bother me too much tbh. We get good results against them and their owner never says bad stuff about us. I think he’s probably too busy eating. I hope they stay up (for Elliot Anderson).

Now we have lovely Spurs. A team who have always considered us to be some kind of talent academy that they can pick from. Sort of like the London version of liVARpool. Waddle, Gazza, Sir Les, Ruel Fox and then laughingly Kevin Scott for £850k. So maybe we got them with the last one.

But let’s cast our minds back to our takeover. Two teams were the most vocal in opposing it: liVARpool and Spurs. So wouldnt it be great if self-appointed big club Spurs get the boot. Well they did want to join the Super League the other year and I’ve heard the Championship is a super league to be in. If they do go down I hope clubs line up to pick their best players off like they do every year. Even if they don’t go down I wouldn’t mind us putting a cheeky bid in for Micky van de Ven, not serious, but just to let them know where they stand. I hope, I really really hope they go down.

Finally we have the happy hammers. West Ham on 13/3/76 was my first ever game (won 2-1). I’ve never minded this lot despite the 8-1 and the 2-0 in 95/96. They have decent fans and know how to protest.

However….going back to 1992/93 and we are top of the Championship under Kevin Keegan and playing some amazing football. So we have the Big Match or whatever on TV and Jimmy “West Ham” Greaves is at pains to point out second placed West Ham are actually the best team in the league. We beat them 2-0 and drew 0-0, won the league (Newcastle 96 points and West Ham finishing second on 88 points) but he couldn’t give us any credit.

Fast forward to the takeover and we have West Ham mouthpiece Karren Brady assuring the football public that despite the takeover “they” are not finished yet. I think she was referring to APT (Associated Party Transaction) rules which were rushed in very quickly after our takeover to limit sponsorship money helping us out. She seemed pleased with herself. I would be pleased and amused in equal measure if they get relegated. And we might just be the club to do it. Poetic justice even if she has recently left.

Not that I’m bitter of course and remember stuff I really should forget. I’d like to add that I’m kind to animals and help old ladies with their shopping.

Chelsea and Tottenham are two of the half dozen Premier League clubs that have built up such a huge advantage over Newcastle United.

This didn’t happen overnight.

Whilst Mike Ashley was holding Newcastle United back for a decade and a half, Chelsea and Tottenham were powering forwards when building revenues.

The Premier League was buoyant, clubs taking advantage of the league’s dominance to drive their revenues in the right direction, especially commercial revenues.

When Mike Ashley finally left Newcastle United in October 2021, the commercial revenue at the club was almost exactly what it was when he had arrived over 14 years earlier.

Considering how thriving the Premier League was during those years, Mike Ashley achieving the near impossible, as he bled the club dry for his own and his retail businesses’ gain.

The one thing we have to be thankful for with Chelsea and Tottenham, is how badly they have operated the football side of things in recent years. Both clubs underperforming despite the huge financial advantages they have over almost every other club, including Newcastle United.

Regrets?

Chelsea

Thomas Tuchel won the Champions League with Chelsea in May 2021 and runners-up in the Premier League.

The 2021/22 season, Tuchel led Chelsea to 3rd in the Premier League as well as losing finalists in both domestic cup competitions and got to the Champions League quarter finals.

The new/current Chelsea owners then came in and on 7 September 2022 Thomas Tuchel was sacked.

Chelsea have then finished 12th, 6th and 4th in the Premier League and are currently 6th.

Chelsea have had five different managers since sacking Tuchel and are now looking for a sixth after Liam Rosenior only lasted three months. The club a total shambles and the financial issues they face are staggering, the levels of debt the Chelsea ownership are responsible for and the interest payments, simply beyond belief.

Tottenham

Mauricio Pochettino led Tottenham to four in a row top four Premier League finishes, the 2018/19 season was the fourth of four and the manager also led Spurs to their first ever Champions League final.

Less than six months later Pochettino was sacked by Spurs.

Since sacking Pochettino, Spurs have managed one top four finish in six seasons, last season they finished fourth bottom and currently they are third bottom and favourites to be relegated.

With Igor Tudor sacked after only six weeks and Roberto De Zerbi becoming their third manager of the season, Tottenham are now on eight managers (and counting) since sacking Pochettino.

Newcastle United?

Both Chelsea and Tottenham now dream of attracting a manager like Eddie Howe.

The disastrous mistakes they made when not realising they had their perfect managers in Thomas Tuchel and Mauricio Pochettino respectively.

No manager is a certainty to succeed BUT when you find the right one, the right fit, you need to treasure them and give them every chance to build long-term success.

Newcastle United now have that in Eddie Howe and a temporary bump in the road shouldn’t be sending the Newcastle United owners off in a different direction when deciding who should manage.

Tottenham are heading into the Championship and Chelsea in a financial mess that now looks impossible for them to climb out of, even if getting Champions League football every season, never mind without it.

Chelsea and Tottenham are two of the six Premier League clubs that have built up such a huge advantage over Newcastle United.

This didn’t happen overnight.

Whilst Mike Ashley was holding Newcastle United back for a decade and a half, Chelsea and Tottenham were powering forwards when it came to building revenues.

The Premier League was buoyant, clubs taking advantage of the league’s dominance to drive their revenues in the right direction, especially when it came to commercial revenues.

When Mike Ashley finally left Newcastle United in October 2021, the commercial revenue at the club was almost exactly what it was when he had arrived over 14 years earlier.

Considering how thriving the Premier League was during those years, Mike Ashley achieving the near impossible, as he bled the club dry for his own and his retail businesses’ gain.

The one thing we have to be thankful for when it comes to Chelsea and Tottenham, is how badly they have operated the football side of things in recent tears. Both clubs underperforming when it comes to the huge financial advantages they have over almost every other club, including Newcastle United.

Regrets?

Chelsea

Thomas Tuchel won the Champions League with Chelsea in May 2021 and runners-up in the Premier League.

The 2021/22 season, Tuchel led Chelsea to 3rd in the Premier League as well as losing finalists in both domestic cup competitions and got to the Champions League quarter finals.

The new/current Chelsea owners then came in and on 7 September 2022 Thomas Tuchel was sacked.

Chelsea have then finished 12th, 6th and 4th in the Premier League and are currently 6th.

Chelsea have had five different managers since sacking Tuchel and will undoubtedly shortly be looking for a sixth. The club a total shambles.

Tottenham

Mauricio Pochettino led Tottenham to four in a row top four Premier League finishes, the 2018/19 season was the fourth of four and the manager also led Spurs to their first ever Champions League final.

Less than six months later Pochettino was sacked by Spurs.

Since sacking Pochettino, Spurs have managed one top four finish in six seasons, last season they finished fourth bottom and currently they are third bottom and favourites to be relegated.

Tottenham are now on eight managers (and counting) since sacking Pochettino.

Newcastle United?

Both Chelsea and Tottenham now dream of attracting a manager like Eddie Howe.

The disastrous mistakes they made when not realising they had their perfect managers in Thomas Tuchel and Mauricio Pochettino respectively.

No manager is a certainty to succeed BUT when you find the right one, the right fit, you need to treasure them and give them every chance to build long-term success.

Off work and watching TV on Thursday, I saw David Bentley talking about Tottenham on Sky Sports News.

I vaguely remembered him.

Checked him out and sure enough, he is a former Tottenham player.

David Bentley is from Peterborough and grew up a Man U fan, was with Arsenal as a kid but didn’t make it. Ended up having a couple of good seasons with Blackburn, then at the age of 23 got a massive five year contract at Tottenham in a big money move and that was pretty much the end of his career!

In his five years on the books of Tottenham, he made 42 appearances and scored two goals. During that time, Bentley was so poor that he ended up getting sent out on loan to a number of clubs but failed to impress.

At the age of 28 he came to the end of his lucrative Tottenham contract in June 2013 and never played professionally again.

A year later David Bentley announced his ‘retirement’ from playing, claiming he had fallen out of love with football and wanted to spend time with his family.

Anyway, now aged 41, Bentley seems to have suddenly rediscovered his love for football and/or is wanting to earn some extra cash, so now finds himself a Tottenham expert on Sky Sports.

David Bentley declaring yesterday: “Tottenham could be the biggest club in the world. And to think of that potential being relegated and sitting in the Championship. Not only financially, but emotionally for…I think for everyone in football. I don’t think there is anyone in football that wants to see Tottenham go down and not be in the Premier League. I think everybody loves watching Tottenham, even if they are neutral. Everybody loves Tottenham, who doesn’t like Spurs? Come on, flamboyant Tottenham.”

I nearly fell off the sofa laughing.

He is desperate for work!

A bit like all those other desperate characters who managed to play a handful of matches for one of the media’s favoured London clubs, it seems like David Bentley will carve out a niche for the likes of Sky Sports, Talksport and whoever. Just like the woeful Jason Cundy and Jamie O’Hara, who also played a handful of matches for Tottenham. The pair of them will say absolutely anything to get attention doing their media stuff.

David Bentley declaring: “Tottenham could be the biggest club in the world” and how no neutral would want to see them relegated…words fail me.

If this was Newcastle United and one of our former players talking about NUFC like that, he would be absolutely ridiculed. When it is the likes of a London club like Tottenham though, the media act very differently.

David Bentley caused me to recall an excellent book I read by Richard Dawkins, not about football by the way. “The God Delusion” saw Dawkins argue that a supernatural creator (a God) does not exist, and that belief in a personal God qualifies as a delusion, which he defines as a persistent false belief that is held in the face of strong contradictory evidence. In the book, he went on to say that when one person suffers from a delusion it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called religion.

In the hours since the sacking of Igor Tudor, I have seen a lot of mentions of how him not buying into the ‘Tottenham Way’, was a major part of his downfall.

Sunday seeing the Spurs boss sacked after six weeks in the job, quite incredible.

Tottenham say they intend to name the replacement in the very near future, this will be their fourth manager in less than a year.

Thomas Frank was sacked last month, following the 2-1 home defeat to Newcastle United, before his sacking, not understanding the ‘Tottenham way’ often said about the former Brentford boss.

As they look for a replacement, needing someone who understands the ‘Tottenham Way’ is apparently essential, if they are to be successful in the role.

What this basically boils down to, is all of these third rate pundits who are former Spurs players, recommending other former Spurs players and managers to get the job.

Amongst the suggestions of those who would be ideal in fully understanding the ‘Tottenham Way’ if getting the job, include Tim Sherwood (who nobody else would dream of employing as a manager), Robbie Keane (who spent last season with a job in Israel and is currently managing in Hungry) and Harry Redknapp (who is 79!!!).

Yes, I can’t see what could possibly go wrong if Spurs employed any of these as manager, or indeed all three of them…

I love the delusions of grandeur amongst Spurs former players, pundits, fans and so on.

This belief they are somehow steeped in a long history of beautiful football that presumably the rest of us have all been green with envy, when looking from afar. If only we could also play the ‘Tottenham Way’….

In reality, it is all a nonsense, any club that claims they are somehow eternal keepers of the beautiful game. You hear this from the likes of Man U fans and supporters of other clubs. As though they are entitled to watch brilliant entertaining football because they always have done, even though this is definitely not the case. Yes, clubs such as Liverpool and Man U have had periods of time when they were the dominant team in English football, bought the best attacking players and played great football. However, this is far from this ‘always’ having been the case.

Anyway, back to Spurs, it is actually a different ‘Tottenham Way’ I want to talk about.

One which they have indeed become famous for in recent times, but most definitely, not a ‘Tottenham Way’ that I want Newcastle United to copy.

The other ‘Tottenham Way’

In charge of Tottenham

Until April 2021 – Jose Mourinho

Until June 2021 – Ryan Mason

Until November 2021 – Nuno

Until March 2023 – Antonio Conte

Until April 2023 – Cristian Stellini

Until June 2023 – Ryan Mason

Until June 2025 – Ange Postecoglou

Until February 2026 – Thomas Frank

Until March 2026 – Igor Tudor

Until – ?????? – ??????

Spurs will end up having had ten different (counting Mason’s spells as separate management times) managers picking the Tottenham team in the space of less than five years, once the latest appointment is announced.

Spurs have huge financial superiority over most clubs, as well as many other advantages, yet they are a total mess.

It was announced in the Brentford accounts released if February on the day he was sacked by Spurs, that Tottenham paid Brentford £6.7m compensation to get Thomas Frank. Maybe not quite as much cash as Chelsea have gone through doing so, but just how much have Spurs paid out across these years, paying compensation to other clubs to get their managers, then having to pay off these same managers (and their staff) not very long afterwards? How much will Igor Tudor have cost Tottenham for six weeks work and one point from five Premier League games?

Of course, if you pick a bad one, you can’t just persevere blindly with them, but how can Spurs (and Chelsea) keep managing to do this, time after time?

Which brings me to Newcastle United.

Which brings me to Eddie Howe.

Eddie Howe has brought stability, continuity, consistency AND success to Newcastle United, despite not having anything like the financial and other advantages that the likes of Spurs and Chelsea have.

Yet a fair few Newcastle United fans would have our club following the ‘Tottenham Way’, despite what Eddie Howe has shown year after year, happy to replace him with some random choice that they are ‘sure’ will be able to do a better job than the genius we have as United boss.

On top of his elite player recruitment and tactical nous across more than four years, Eddie Howe is also a class act when representing us off the pitch, how he speaks to the media, his honesty and readiness to accept responsibility, not throw his players under a bus like certain jokers Newcastle United have employed in the past.

I would love to think that Tottenham will go through another ten or more managers in charge whilst Eddie Howe still remains our leader. If that happens, then Newcastle United will be in a really good place.

Spurs were lucky to find three teams worse than them last season, when finishing fourth bottom of the Premier League. Occupying that position once again, with seven games remaining, they appear reliant on West Ham (one point behind Tottenham) being just as bad as them in the final weeks of the season. The only problem with that is, whilst Tottenham have no wins in their last 13 PL matches and have picked up only five points from their last possible 39, West Ham have picked up 16 points in their most recent 13 PL games.