Football365

reason revealed by leading Reds journalist

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Description

Liverpool goalkeeper Alisson has not been included in Arne Slot’s squad for Thursday’s Carabao Cup semi-final second leg against Tottenham.

Slot surprised Liverpool fans with his team selection as the Reds look to overturn a 1-0 deficit from the first leg last month.

The Reds fell to a surprise defeat at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium but remain strong favourites to advance to the final of the Carabao Cup.

Whoever progresses to the final at Wembley will face Newcastle United after their spectacular 4-0 aggregate victory over Arsenal.

Slot handed starts to Darwin Nunez, Curtis Jones, Conor Bradley and Caoimhin Kelleher for the second leg at Anfield.

No. 1 goalkeeper Alisson has not been included in the squad, but any fears were quickly alleviated by Liverpool journalist James Pearce.

Pearce says the Brazilian has been rested and does not have an injury. He wrote on social media: ‘Alisson just rested tonight, no fitness worries’.

Dropping Alisson to the bench would not have been surprising given it is a cup match, but his omission altogether did ring alarm bells.

Mathys Tel was named on the bench by Ange Postecoglou and could make his Spurs debut after signing from Bayern Munich on deadline day.

Fellow new signing Kevin Danso was named in the starting XI and partners Ben Davies at centre-back.

Full Liverpool starting XI v Spurs: Caoimhin Kelleher; Conor Bradley, Ibrahima Konate, Virgil van Dijk, Andy Robertson; Curtis Jones, Ryan Gravenberch, Dominik Szoboszlai; Mohamed Salah, Darwin Nunez, Cody Gakpo

Spurs XI: Antonin Kinsky; Archie Gray, Kevin Danso, Ben Davies, Djed Spence; Rodrigo Bentancur, Yves Bissouma, Pape Matar Sarr; Dejan Kulusevski, Richarlison, Heung-min Son

Source

Harry Kane tipped to snub Tottenham return 'agreement' for Gunners with 'secret clause'

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Description

Bayern Munich striker Harry Kane has been tipped to reject a return to Tottenham Hotspur, while Paul Merson reckons Arsenal “will buy him”.

The England international left boyhood club Spurs to join Bayern Munich during the 2023 summer transfer window for around £86m.

Kane departed Tottenham to give himself a better chance of winning team trophies and he’s on track to lift the Bundesliga this term after Bayern Munich missed out on the title last season.

Despite this, the 31-year-old has consistently been linked with a return to the Premier League over the past couple of months and it’s emerged that there is a ‘secret clause agreement’ in his Bayern Munich contract.

This enabled him to leave for around £66m in January or around £54m during the 2026 winter transfer window.

READ: Manchester United, Spurs and Man City shamed by transfer efficiency ranking

Tottenham – according to The Telegraph – have a ‘first option agreement’ with Bayern Munich, but this depends on two conditions.

‘Telegraph Sport understands that there is a release clause in Kane’s Bayern contract, even though he is said to be extremely happy in Germany and has no thoughts of activating it any time soon. Premier League clubs are already aware of the existence of Kane’s release clause, which could be crucial to a potential return to England.

‘Kane moved to Bayern on a four-year contract for £100m in August 2023, with Tottenham also securing a first option agreement as part of the transfer. That would only be applicable should Bayern agree to sell Kane and the striker wanted to return to Spurs, where he spent 13 years and became the club’s all-time highest scorer.

‘There is no fixed fee in Tottenham’s first-option agreement, meaning the club would still have to trigger his release clause or negotiate a price with Bayern for Kane.

‘Should a rival club ever trigger his Bayern release clause, Tottenham would have to decide whether or not to match the bid and hope the 31-year-old preferred a return to North London.’

MORE ARSENAL COVERAGE ON F365…

👉 David Raya is forcing Clive Tyldesley to come out as a passing sceptic

👉 Arsenal: ‘Word from inside’ reveals ‘likeliest’ striker signing amid Arteta’s ‘very close’ verdict

👉 Five Arsenal players in need of an upgrade to win the Premier League (or anything at all)

Arsenal are known to be in the market for a striker. Merson has explained why his former club could sign Kane and why he may reject a return to Spurs.

“Arsenal will buy him,” Merson lightheartedly said on Sky Sports.

When asked whether he was serious, he added: “Why not? £64m, why not? Sol Campbell did [make the move].

“People will go ‘Oh he’s this age and that age’ but Arsenal need now.”

He continued: “If Arsenal haven’t won the League, you’ve got to take a chance. You’ve got to take a chance, buy someone that’s proven.

“I wouldn’t be surprised, and when you’re Harry Kane and you’ve been told you can go for £64m, there’s only a couple of teams who could buy him.

“Maybe Tottenham will buy him back but he’ll have to win something at Bayern Munich to go back to Tottenham. If you’ve not won anything at Bayern Munich, you’re not going back to Tottenham to win nothing.”

Source

Harry Kane 'secret clause': Tottenham 'secure' return 'agreement only applicable' on two conditions

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Description

Tottenham Hotspur reportedly have a ‘first option agreement’ with Bayern Munich which could push through Harry Kane’s return to the Premier League.

Kane is one of the best strikers in Premier League history as he’s scored 213 goals in his 317 appearances in English’s top division for boyhood club Tottenham Hotspur.

During the 2023 summer transfer window, the 31-year-old left Spurs as he looked to end his long wait for a team trophy.

After being linked with several Premier League rivals, Kane joined Bundesliga giants Bayern Munich for around £86m.

The 2023/24 campaign was disastrous for Bayern Munich as they failed to win a trophy, but they are currently six points clear of second-placed Bayer Leverkusen at the top of the Bundesliga.

Kane has 70 goals in 72 appearances for Bayern Munich, but he’s been sporadically linked with a potential return to the Premier League over the past couple of years.

READ: Manchester United, Spurs and Man City shamed by transfer efficiency ranking

Earlier this week, a report from German outletSport BILD revealed Kane has a ‘secret clause agreement’ in his Bayern Munich, which enabled him to leave last month or during the 2026 January transfer window if he wants to ‘return to England’.

The report explains:

‘The striker would have had to pull the clause during the winter transfer window and would then have been allowed to move for an estimated sum of 80 million euros (£66.5m).

‘However: The clause will be valid again next winter, then for a transfer for summer 2026.

‘The transfer fee that FC Bayern would receive in this case should then only be an estimated 65 million euros (£54m). When the contract ends in the summer of 2027, the striker would then be free of charge.’

MORE SPURS COVERAGE ON F365…

👉 Tel reveals precisely why he definitely ‘rejected’ Arsenal and Man Utd moves to join Spurs

👉 Who will be the next manager of Tottenham after Ange Postecoglou?

👉 Postecoglou offers insight into Tel ‘conversation’; confirms Tottenham injury blow before Carabao Cup

A new report from The Telegraph’s Matt Law confirms Kane’s release clause exits and he’s explained what this could mean for Spurs and their Premier League rivals.

‘Telegraph Sport understands that there is a release clause in Kane’s Bayern contract, even though he is said to be extremely happy in Germany and has no thoughts of activating it any time soon. Premier League clubs are already aware of the existence of Kane’s release clause, which could be crucial to a potential return to England.

‘Kane moved to Bayern on a four-year contract for £100m in August 2023, with Tottenham also securing a first option agreement as part of the transfer. That would only be applicable should Bayern agree to sell Kane and the striker wanted to return to Spurs, where he spent 13 years and became the club’s all-time highest scorer.

‘There is no fixed fee in Tottenham’s first-option agreement, meaning the club would still have to trigger his release clause or negotiate a price with Bayern for Kane.

‘Should a rival club ever trigger his Bayern release clause, Tottenham would have to decide whether or not to match the bid and hope the 31-year-old preferred a return to North London.’

Source

Tottenham: Postecoglou reveals insight into Tel 'conversation' with Carabao Cup vs Liverpool injury blow confirmed

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Description

Ange Postecoglou has hit out at suggestions that Mathys Tel initially rejected Spurs and revealed an injury blow before Thursday’s match vs Liverpool.

It was reported that the teenager initially rejected a move to Spurs after the North London outfit had a bid worth around £60m accepted by the Bundesliga giants.

However, Tel was persuaded to perform a U-turn after having a “conversation” with head coach Postecoglou. He could debut on Thursday night when Spurs face Liverpool in the second leg of their Carabao Cup semi-final with his new side leading 1-0 on aggregate.

Postecoglou has explained the Tel situation, claiming he “just wanted to be comfortable with his decision”.

“I think people need to understand that you are talking about a 19-year-old who has to make a major decision for his career and it’s not that he rejected us or rejected anyone else – I think he just wanted to be comfortable with his decision. I don’t think he wanted to be pushed in a certain direction and it’s credit to him,” Postecoglou said.

READ: Tel reveals precisely why he definitely ‘rejected’ Arsenal and Man Utd moves to join Spurs

“I had a conversation with him and it was purely around the football and I think he’ll find a really good place for him here. Irrespective of age he will get an opportunity here.

“The way we play I think will suit him and what we are building beyond – I thought this would be the perfect fit for his next step. I think it’s right that he took time in his decision.”

He continued: “I am more than 100% sure that he wants to be here.

“He was so diligent when he made the decision that it gave me even more confidence that we were getting the right kind of mentality and player. He is very ambitious. He has a great deal of self belief and confidence and it feels like he can reach the very top of the game.”

MORE SPURS COVERAGE ON F365…

👉 Harry Kane ‘secures’ exit ‘clause’ for ‘return to England’ as report reveals cut-price transfer fee

👉 When will Rashford, Tel, Gonzalez, Hennessey and rest of £170m January signings debut?

👉 Postecoglou remains Sack Race favourite despite Spurs winning actual Premier League game

Postecoglou has also revealed that they will be without Micky van de Ven and Cristian Romero for the Liverpool match.

“In terms of availability, everyone is fine from last week so no issues there. Kevin Danso and Mathys Tel are both available, they have trained,” Postecoglou revealed.

“With Micky [van de Ven] and [Cristian] Romero to a certain extent, I kind of feel we have to be a bit more conservative with them.

“Micky got through the game [vs Elfsborg] alright but I don’t think he feels ready for Premier League intensity and that’s the same with Cristian.

“We are going to keep them ticking over in training and make sure they are absolutely ready with no set-backs.”

He added: “Kevin Danso will play. Whether he starts or not we will have a look because we have another game in three days.

“Pedro [Porro] has played every minute of football we’ve had for the last three months. It’s great to get Kevin in but whether he will start or come on, we will make a decision. Having him available as an option is good.”

Source

Tottenham news: Spurs 'won't give up' on star centre

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Description

Former Tottenham scout Mick Brown feels Spurs “won’t give up” on trying to get Marc Guehi through the door, as he explained why a summer offer has a better chance of success than their January approach.

Spurs made a last-gasp attempt to sign Crystal Palace defender Guehi in January. They had already signed Kevin Danso on an initial loan, but been turned down by Fikayo Tomori and Axel Disasi, and seen Radu Dragusin sidelined for probably the rest of the season.

Palace rejected the late bid, but Fabrizio Romano stated the interest would run to the summer.

Supporting that, former Tottenham scout Brown reckons the club will be back in then, and Palace have more chance of accepting given the timing.

“I expect they’ll revisit that offer in the summer, they won’t give up,” Brown told Football Insider.

“Guehi is a wanted man, Newcastle wanted him last summer and now Tottenham are after him. Tottenham need a centre-back and he’s the ideal option there.

“He’s as stable as there is at the back, he’s a regular starter for England now, and he can go under the radar at times at Crystal Palace. He plays at a solid level every week and is consistently impressive, so a few clubs have been looking at him.

“Palace rejected their offer not because of the fee but because of the timing of it, which I understand completely, it’s a perfectly reasonable stance for them to take.

“But in the summer, that could change, and I think Tottenham will come back in with a new offer.”

MORE ON TOTTENHAM FROM F365:

👉 Reason Man Utd pulled Tel plug revealed after INEOS ‘baulked’ at request for Spurs-bound star

👉 Every Premier League transfer completed in the 2025 January window

👉 Shocking Mathys Tel loan details revealed after Tottenham strike deadline day signing

It’s felt Guehi could transform the way Spurs play, with Ally McCoist of the opinion that Ange Postecoglou could change the shape of the defence to cater to his talents along with those already in the back line.

“I thought that would be a great signing in respect to, I would change Tottenham’s shape if they signed Guehi and I played the three centre-backs with two wider boys,” McCoist said.

“And it would have probably suited Ange in the way he plays.”

That would rest on the hopes that three centre-backs were all fit at one time. Micky van de Ven and Cristian Romero are the preferred starters, but both have missed much of this season.

Source

Tottenham legend Harry Kane 'secures' shock 'secret clause agreement' for 'return to England' with bargain fee

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Description

Harry Kane has reportedly ‘secured’ a transfer clause which would enable the Tottenham Hotspur legend to leave Bayern Munich and ‘return to England’.

Kane established himself as one of the best strikers in Europe at Tottenham, scoring 280 goals in his 435 appearances for his boyhood club.

At Spurs, Kane endured a prolonged wait to win team trophies and pursued an exit during the 2023 summer transfer window.

Kane had entered the final year of his last Tottenham contract, so he was available for an affordable price. Bayern Munich fended off competition from Premier League sides to sign the England international for around £86m.

READ: Five players stuck as transfer window closes after Marcus Rashford escape

The 31-year-old missed out on a trophy in his first season at Bayern Munich, but they have marched clear at the top of the Bundesliga this term. He has 70 goals in his 72 appearances for Vincent Kompany’s side.

Kane has been sporadically linked with a move back to the Premier League over the past 18 months. A report from German outlet Sport BILD claims he has ‘secured’ a transfer clause in his Bayern Munich contract, which expires in 2027.

Regarding the ‘secret agreement’ with this clause, which is only active in winter transfer windows, the report explains:

‘The striker would have had to pull the clause during the winter transfer window and would then have been allowed to move for an estimated sum of 80 million euros (£66.5m).

‘However: The clause will be valid again next winter, then for a transfer for summer 2026. The transfer fee that FC Bayern would receive in this case should then only be an estimated 65 million euros (£54m). When the contract ends in the summer of 2027, the striker would then be free of charge.’

TOTTENHAM COVERAGE ON F365…

👉 ‘Great signing’ would have entirely transformed Tottenham side after last-gasp bid – McCoist

👉 Postecoglou remains Sack Race favourite despite Spurs winning actual Premier League game

👉 Who will be the next manager of Tottenham after Ange Postecoglou?

This clause is in place should Kane want to pursue a ‘return to England’ and the report also mentions two potential replacements ‘discussed internally’ at Bayern Munich.

‘For Kane, making use of his clause was never an issue in his second Bundesliga season. The captain of the English national team feels very comfortable in Munich both in terms of football and in his private life with his family.

‘The clause offers Kane the opportunity to move beyond just England. He could also move to the USA at the end of his career.

‘Regardless of the fact that FC Bayern will continue to rely on Kane next season, who will turn 32 in July, the club is looking for a successor for the future.

‘Names like Benjamin Sesko (21/RB Leipzig) and Viktor Gyökeres (26/Sporting) were discussed internally.

‘Both would cost a high transfer fee of around 70 million euros, but would receive significantly less salary than Kane, who already came to Bayern as a top star and earns an estimated 25 million euros a year.’

Source

Tottenham news: 'Great signing' would have entirely transformed Spurs side after last

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Description

Ally McCoist feels the signing of Marc Guehi would have had a big impact at Tottenham and would “probably have suited” the system of manager Ange Postecoglou.

Spurs tried their hand at signing a few players at the back end of the January window. Mathys Tel rejected them with days to go, but came around on the project on deadline day, signing on loan.

At the other end of the pitch, Tottenham were turned down by centre-backs Fikayo Tomori and Axel Disasi, and ended up signing Kevin Danso on loan, but also made an attempt for England international Guehi.

Transfer insider Fabrizio Romano revealed the bid for the Crystal Palace man, and how it had been rejected.

But had they landed him, McCoist feels Guehi could have been transformative to the way Spurs play.

“I thought that would be a great signing in respect to, I would change Tottenham’s shape if they signed Guehi and I played the three centre-backs with two wider boys,” he said on talkSPORT.

“And it would have probably suited Ange in the way he plays.”

At the moment, Spurs play with two centre-backs, and given injuries the main pairing has been Radu Dragusin and Archie Gray this term – the latter a right-back or central-midfielder.

But when Cristian Romero is back fit, and Micky van de Ven fully returns to action, if Guehi were also in the centre-back corps, it would seemingly be tough, on paper, to pick the best two out of those three.

MORE ON TOTTENHAM FROM F365:

👉 Reason Man Utd pulled Tel plug revealed after INEOS ‘baulked’ at request for Spurs-bound star

👉 Every Premier League transfer completed in the 2025 January window

👉 Shocking Mathys Tel loan details revealed after Tottenham strike deadline day signing

That could indeed see all three picked. The last time Tottenham played a back-three formation – against Everton on January 19 – they lost 3-2, though the trio was not to the level of Romero, Van de Ven and Guehi.

At the moment, it is immaterial, as the Palace man did not join, but Romano did state his transfer could open up again in the summer.

Though there is likely to be interest from a number of other Premier League big boys, Spurs, after making an attempt in January, could well be there again.

Source

Tottenham transfers: Shocking Mathys Tel loan details revealed after Spurs seal deadline day signing

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Description

Reports from Germany have confirmed that Tottenham have agreed to an largely expensive loan deal after signing Mathys Tel.

Tottenham have been in dogged form all season, losing 13 times in the league and they currently sit 14th in the league table after a difficult spell.

Whereas Tel was brought in to provide a boost in the final third, they’ve scored the fourth-most goals in the league but shipped the eighth-most goals at the back.

Defensive additions were needed with the injuries suffered by both Cristian Romero and Micky van den Ven and the latest news regarding Radu Dragusin being out for the season has only made it more of a difficult situation.

And yet, after being rejected by Chelsea’s Axel Disasi, the only deal they were able to complete was a move for Tel – and that has reportedly ended up being extremely expensive for just a six-month loan.

SportBILD’s Christian Falk has given fans the lowdown on the full details regarding the deal which shows that Tottenham were desperate to bring the attacker to the club.

Taking to X, he revealed: ‘Tottenham are paying loan fee up to €10million for Mathys Tel (19) to FC Bayern. Tottenham pays the entire salary of Tel til Summer. The buying Option in Summer will be €60million for Tottenham‘.

READ NEXT: ‘He told me…’ – Tottenham deadline day signing confirms what Harry Kane said to him prior to move

Is this a good deal for Spurs?

Tel is highly-rated and has been tipped to replicate Robert Lewandowski-type numbers in his future but he has no goals in 14 appearances this season.

That is down to the fact he has been mostly used as a late substitute and hasn’t had any chance to find his feet under Vincent Kompany.

Capable of playing off the left, right or in the middle, Ange Postecoglou will likely use him consistently and across multiple positions given there is Dominic Solanke, Son-Heung Min and Richarlison he can rotate with.

His energy, quick feet and direct nature should go hand-in-hand with their fast attacking style, but it is hard to ignore the financials involved in the deal.

While he will be a strong addition and will bring something new, paying over the odds is likely what forced this deal over the line, despite the Zoom call from Postecoglou which supposedly convinced Tel to join.

Paying the entirety of his wages and a loan fee close to €10million is extremely high for a youngster only here on a temporary deal.

Manchester United reportedly baulked at the demands from the German club pulling out of the deal despite them needing serious attacking reinvestment after Marcus Rashford and Antony’s exits.

Aston Villa completed three loan moves for Rashford, Marco Asensio and Axel Disasi that involved heavy loan fees but those were compensated by the deals done for Jhon Duran and Jaden Philogene which raised around £90million.

For Spurs, if Tel fails to hit the heights and find his feet, it will go down as a poor and expensive deal and many will likely wonder why a centre-back wasn’t prioritised, especially if they fall to a disappointing season end – it certainly qualifies as a huge risk at the time of writing.

Source

Tottenham transfers: Mathys Tel reveals what Harry Kane told him about Spurs move

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Description

Bayern Munich attacker Mathys Tel has confirmed what Harry Kane told him about moving to Tottenham after completing a deadline-day move.

Tel, 19, had attracted attention from the likes of Chelsea, Manchester United and other clubs but it was Spurs who managed to form a deal.

With less than 500 minutes of action this season, including just two league starts, he was allowed to leave.

Given their poor run of form that has left them languishing in 14th place with 13 defeats, Tel’s versatility in attack is set to be a boost given he plays across the frontline, is eager to play and prove himself and will be given freedom in Ange Postecoglou’s fluid system.

The young attacker arrives on loan until the end of the season and the club have an option to buy him in the summer for a reported fee of £45m.

His teammate at Bayern was Kane, who netted an incredible 280 goals in 435 games for Spurs, and Tel revealed what the England international told him about his former club.

“He told me this is a big club with a lot of very good people, the pitch is very nice, the training centre is very good and if you go there you can enjoy it. Everything was positive from Harry.” Tel said in a video released on social media.

READ NEXT: Every Premier League transfer completed in the 2025 January window

Why Tel didn’t join Man Utd

While a move to Tottenham was completed in the final hours of the window, Tel had been the subject of intense speculation across the past few weeks with other Premier League clubs.

Chelsea had originally registered an interest in what could have been a possible swap deal involving Christopher Nkunku but the German club pulled out of any deal due to their current attacking depth.

The Blues failed to follow up on their interest which allowed the likes of Manchester United to register an interest. With Alejandro Garnacho linked with an exit to Chelsea and Napoli, they were in the running for a move.

However, with no exit for the Argentinian winger, and Bayern demanding a £6.5million loan fee with no option to buy, they pulled out of the deal.

While Spurs had initially been rejected by the young attacker, he made a U-turn with his decision after speaking to Postecoglou over a Zoom video call.

Plus, they were happy to cover the entirety of his wages which helped force the deal through in the final hours of the window.

They had attempted to bring Chelsea’s Axel Disasi to the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium to help cover for their defensive issues but he rejected them in favour of a move to Aston Villa.

Tel will now be available to jump into the cup action against Liverpool this week but a debut looks more likely for next weekend’s clash with Manchester United.

Source

Jorge Vital is Man Utd’s fourth-choice striker; they needed Spurs’ ‘zero shame’

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Description

Manchester United have somehow emerged from the January transfer window with even fewer attacking options than before.

Send your views on the transfer window – check out the completed moves – to theeditor@football365.com

How have Man Utd worsened their attacking options?

I’m very much in two minds about United’s transfer window. On paper it doesn’t do much for us in the short term but it in the long term we might have signed some quality young players for a small enough amount (less than £30m combined) that we might actually sell all of them for a profit even if they don’t turn out to be top quality.

On the one hand I quite like the business we have done: some depth for the future on the left side with two young physical and quick wing backs, at least one of whom looks good going forwards and might actually provide an answer for a season long problem on the short term. And we’ve signed a young left sided centre back for free. A position where Everton wanted to charge us £70M in the Summer.

Doesn’t matter if he turns out to be shit he’s free and will almost certainly provide us with a profit should he be sold. Given Martinez’ injury he’s at least a body in the squad. The signing of two young wing backs (or at the very least, attacking full backs) also signifies something of a long term approach to squad building, suggesting that even without Amorim, full backs attacking the box will remain a feature of our play.

We’ve also avoided any panic buys or loaning a past it centre forward. Or Wout Weghorst. With the loans of Rashford, Antony and Malacia we’ve got a fair whack of wages off the club for six months. This obviously makes it easier for us to comply with PSR in 24/25, making it more likely we avoid a points deduction amidst next year’s inevitable relegation battle. Maybe it’ll give us a little extra to work with in the summer and puts said players in the shop window.

But then… look at United. We are so bad going forwards. It feels like we needed to do something here. Our two forwards have a combined xg of less than six and have scored five goals between them (yeh it’s not shooting that’s their problem). Spurs, though they’ve been gash for a while now, score goals for fun yet still were so desperate to sign Mathys Tel (a shot machine) that they showed absolutely zero shame in being rejected and having another crack.

Not saying Tel is the answer for United, he may well be more of a left forward than a striker, but it turns out he was available on loan and United weren’t even attempting to beat Spurs. You’d have to say that Spurs look more likely to win the Europa League because they can score goals than United who really can’t. Spurs haven’t been more likely to win a trophy than United for about 60 years.

And if not Tel then surely there was someone who could do some sort of job? Our current depth chart at centre forward reads:

Hojlund

Zirkzee

Mainoo

Jorge Vital

There isn’t any sign of any young forwards coming through the ranks that can play there right now, though as with Rashford someone might surprise us. Even with the cups, this season is a write-off. I’m taking my son to Old Trafford for his first competitive game and I’m gravely concerned that the whole experience will put him off football for life. But then he’s Scottish, so that’s maybe a good thing.

I think we’ve started making good decisions for the long term. I’m just petrified of the worst-case scenario this season (relegation) though we are helped by the current bottom four being utter tripe.

I am not however at the stage that Aman is, who is so upset he can’t even get his facts straight (Pogba was our record signing) and whilst I think it is partly their fault, I doubt many strikers would be able to outscore Hojlund and Zirkzee’s xg enough to make any sort of fee worth it, certainly not 150. And contrary to His Honourable Gentleman (I assume) Dr Yeboah, I hope that Amorim sticks to his guns. Ten Hag changed immediately and achieved short-term success and look where we are now.

That said, if we don’t start to see improvement now he’s got some training time (still not totally convinced with that argument) it’s going to be increasingly choppy.

Ashmundo (just 11 more points, please)

READ: January transfer window winners: Rashford, Nottingham Forest, Spurs, Manchester City and more

…As February roles in, we are faced with the prospect of watching a once great Empire crumble further into chaos. I’m not talking about the US, but my beloved Manchester United.

Much like our friends across the pond, this once imperious force on the global stage, now fail to even get basic decisions right.

United have scored 28 league goals this season. Tottenham, 1 league place below them, are on 48.

Leicester, 18th- in the relegation zone- have 25.

Anyone who has watched even a single United game in recent months can see they are woefully short of ideas and confidence in front of goal.

They desperately need a driving force up front, a leader, who instinctively knows how to work a goalkeeper and find the back of the net. Hojlund and Zirkzee are promising talents, but neither is anywhere near ready to lead a team of United’s ambition – even if that ambition is a top half finish and a Europa cup run.

Why, once again, are we left scratching around on deadline day, hoping for an 11th hour loan of yet another exciting but unproven player, only to be beaten to it by Tottenham? Where is the planning? The organisation?

It’s an embarrassment for a club of United’s history and success. Next they pathetically send out the client journalists to try and spin this tall tale that they “didn’t want to waste money on a loan fee”- what, were they hoping Bayern would lend Tel to us for free?

You don’t need a FIFA pro license, or an MBA from Harvard, to work out that a team woefully lacking in goals, languishing in 13th– will not be improved by not only failing to sign any attacking players, but letting two of your current ones leave on loan.

Rashford and Antony were not starters- but they were good depth. This season has seen Sancho, Greenwood, McTominay (occasional makeshift CF) and now Antony and Rashford depart.

If we concluded the problem is the team, not the manager, then we probably need some new people in that team, even if they can’t be very expensive people.

They are now reliant on Garnacho and Diallo providing their wide forward attack, for a whole half a season, including European and FA cup football.

Even in the unlikely event they actually start winning matches, these players will need a rest at some point. Are we bringing on Johnny Evans on the right wing at 75 minutes? Or perhaps that 60 year old goalkeeping coach Amorim seems so fond of?

So much for Sir Jim and co “doing things differently”- the only difference is we failed to get the last minute panic buy over the line this year. If they didn’t want a loan player, why did they go in for him?

It can simultaneously be true that Manchester United need to recruit savvy long term reinforcements in the summer, whilst desperately needing something in the interim to save what is left of their season.

Whilst the likes of Tel did risk being yet another underwhelming gamble, surely they could have found an older player to fill the void for 6 months?

Henrik Larsson was a prime example in the Ferguson era, during a time when Manchester United understood the importance of goals. Ighalo was much the same for Ole. Even Weghorst, whilst a little lacking in the ball-in-the-net department, worked so hard for United during Ten Hag’s brief spell of promise.

Alvaro Morata was clearly available. Would Danny Welbeck have turned down the chance for a brief cameo back home at United? Would Jamie Vardy not have been tempted to wear that famous shirt in the dying embers of his career? Could Mitrovic, Ivan Toney, Memphis Depay or Olivier Giroud not be tempted back to the premier league? They all know how to score goals- something this United team at the moment sorely do not.

They are a club in chaos – changing their manager 4 months after the rest of the planet realise it is an inevitable necessity, and belatedly appointing one of huge promise, only to deprive him of the basic personnel needed to have any success in his job.

They insisted he move immediately in November, when his strong preference was to come this summer, only to force him to undergo the humiliation of seemingly writing the season off, gutting the team, and undermining his reputation and morale before making any attempt to model a team in his image.

The Glazers and Ineos will not last. What a mess.

Mike, (this time next year Rodney we’ll be millionaires) Oxford

On Arsenal celebrations and Pep

I dunno what all the grumbling about Arsenal is about.

They scored a good win over a team who mocked them last time and turned that mocking against them. That is peak football if you ask me. Arsenal fans should be allowed to enjoy it. As should the team and staff.

On the topic of Pep he isn’t a manager for building something new, never has been. As someone else pointed out, he’s the manager for building on top of a good foundation. Each time he has taken over players who already won trophies, we’re already experienced. In the case of Bayern despite his two doubles he was a failure really because he took over a treble winning team and was asked to win the Champions League and never did. At least at City he can say that he did what was asked, he delivered the Champions League that everyone begged him for.

But he’s a bit like Jose. He’s world class in very specific circumstances. He couldn’t take Aberdeen to stardom like Alex. Or take a fallen giant with no budget like Liverpool to winning every trophy. It’s just not in his wheel house. That’s no slight because what he’s done is still impressive. But City likely need someone else to build a new team now, that’s not Pep’s skill set. Pep is the next step guy, not the first step guy.

Finally there are people who say the prem is not as competitive as it used to be. Absolute hogwash. This is probably the most competitive season in its history. Small clubs actually taking the game to big clubs, and winning! The only thing that’s worse now than the past is refereeing. Which is genuinely the lowest quality it’s ever been and seems to get worse.

Lee

Pep’s biggest challenge is actually himself

City fan here. I suppose I am responding to Patricio’s assessment that Pep has hit his 1st challenge and failed. His mail sounds as if it was an AI summary at the top of a Google search for ‘Fraudiola’.

Of course when you do so well so consistently, you are seen to be having it easy rather than actually overcoming road blocks and when you struggle as he is now, you are supposedly hitting the very first obstacle. It’s as if spending a truckload of money and getting back a dominant team year after year is child’s play. Hi United for the last 10 years (getting worse the more money they spend). Hi Boehly’s Chelsea.

No, keeping a great team on top as he has done is a challenge regardless of the financial backing.

And yet, I am incredibly frustrated with Pep. The view from the inside is different, but still somewhat damning. As I see it, the challenge that Pep seems unable to overcome and the reason why this collapse has been as dramatic as it has is his own philosophical stubbornness. This is his Achilles’ heel.

I don’t doubt that the Rodri injury was the straw that broke the camels back, and that the aging, small and injury-laden squad is making Pep’s job significantly more difficult. But he is not helping the team or himself by refusing to see the forest for the trees.

If I had 10 mins of the man’s time I would ask, why he has allowed City to become so rigid and predictable. In the early days of Pep’s time at City he instilled his distinctive philosophy of choking the opposition with possession, a high defensive line, synchronised pressing and fluid fullback positioning. Yet through the talented feet of Ederson and the likes of the pacey Sane, he had the perfect foil. As the opposition sought to press high themselves, the were undone as City were also capable of going long, or breaking fast. Defenders could never relax and box City in so deftly as they do today. It does not surprise me that City’s best play of late was against Chelsea. The ease of which sending the ball long got Chelsea turned upside down was stark.

And so it is incredibly frustrating to see Pep almost intentionally stomp out this part of City’s game out for the Arsenal match. Let’s face it, everyone pretty much has his number right now as the religiously performed slow build up high line is just a one-dimensional boxing glove in a wind-up box compressing a spring until it rebounds viciously in our faces at a much greater rate than it successfully forces the defense into submission.

The fleeting moments of joy for City vs Arsenal came not from pinning them back as Pep is so fond of, but the few times a player tried something different usually Marmoush or (surprisingly) Kovatic, moving towards the opposition box at pace.

Pep has indeed been found out, as he does not seem willing to try anything but to slowly strangle the opposition to death. He refuses to acknowledge any other approach to putting the ball in the net. So fed up of seeing Foden receive the ball under pressure and invariably give it straight back to the passer rather than try something risky. Fed up of seeing Nunes… full stop? No a bit harsh, but he can’t defend and he has one move on the right flank. Worst of all, I’m fed up of seeing City turn their nose up at exploiting the oppostion on the counter, with a fast break. They have lost their instincts

This isn’t a call for Pep to scrap his tactics, but you have to mix in some variety to keep the defenders guessing. It’s so utterly basic in it’s premise. Like playing Rock-Paper-Scissors and always picking paper, it’s doomed to fail. As long as the ball never goes in behind them, defenders won’t panic, their job is simple, and the way to counter it is well-known. Haaland’s not to blame. Like any number 9, he needs that unpredictability to make him hard to mark. Not once did I see us respect his runs in behind. Reduced to trying to get on the end of the occasional cross into a crowded box, he’s utterly wasted.

This is Pep’s biggest test, overcoming his own stubbornness.

Nick

READ: 16 Conclusions on Arsenal 5 Manchester City 1

Actually the worst miss ever

I’ve grown to learn not to take the Stewie bait, but I don’t know what’s funnier – Stewie writing in at half time before Arsenal walloped City, Havertz getting one of the goals or the fact he thinks Havertz’s miss was the worst ever.

The worst miss ever actually came in the second month of the Premier League and involved Rocket Ronnie Rosental and Aston Villa.

Graham Simons, Gooner, Norf London

Stewie is back…

Arsenal fans deary me. I can’t even recall a similar level of iconic celebratory dancing when Spurs went to Etihad (where Arteta has never won) and spanked Pep 4-0, a more impressive result. Were Arsenal fans graceful about that result? Or, did they down-talk that result with the caveat that “Pep is cooked”? 🤔 Of course, now that Arsenal finally get a win vs a totally destroyed Pep Citeh, it is being celebrated like the discovery of genome editing. In reality, it’s a team that’s spent over £750m finally getting a strong result, against a washed Pep team. Even Amorim spanked Pep a few months back didn’t he?

What I want to address is the usual intellectual dishonesty of Arsenal fans. It’s understandable they’re all excited to finally beat a Pep side convincingly (who hasn’t this season? 🙄). Their latest “woe betide poor Arsenal” is “aren’t we allowed to enjoy ourselves”? First off, here’s that MAGA DEEP STATE parallel again: exactly who is preventing Arsenal from enjoying themselves? Is this like the “War on Xmas” Fox News tells us about every December? The apparent one where you are “not allowed to say merry Xmas anymore”? Because the WOKE RADICAL FAKE NEWS MEDIA won’t let us! 😂. What the F are these Arsenal fans on about? Celebrate and enjoy, if you see the achievement as such! The problem is, Arsenal fans are constantly projecting. Their first reaction to the “Greatest result ever”? Whine that the world isn’t impressed with your pyrrhic victory! So you see, the only people “preventing” Arsenal fans from enjoying themselves iiiiis….Ah yes: Arsenal fans!

And here’s that Trump analogy again: Arsenal fans, do you have any realisation of how ridiculous it looks when there’s endless conspiracy theories after every dropped Arsenal point – but, rarely a word is said about the refs after a victory (MLS freak incident aside)? This is the equivalent of shouting “RIGGED FAKE FRAUDULENT ELECTION, STOP THE COUNT!”, when you lose….but conversely not a squeak about ethics or integrity when you do win! Funny that.

Did Arsenal fans let Brighton fans enjoy their well-earned point at the Emirates? Ah right, no. PGMOL DEEP STATE COLLUSION! Of course. Were Bournemouth fans allowed to enjoy a famous home win? Again, no chance: PGMOL BROOKLYN BASEMENT HILLARY CLINTON EMAILS. Were Citeh fans able to enjoy a 97th-minute equaliser? Nope! PGMOL AND UAE PETROSTATE COLLUSION! TOTALLY RIGGED PROCESS! So opposition fans are never able to enjoy wins against Arsenal you see, as those are only ever handed to them by the “Deep State refs”. But naturally, the Deep State never gives favours for Arsenal. Right? Nope, never profit from the system.

Who remembers how precious Arsenal fans were about Haaland lightly chucking a ball at Gabriel? It’s “bantz”, it’s shithousing (which Gabriel excels at btw) and all’s fair in love and war etc….Except – on these very 365 pages, various Arsenal fans virtually DEMANDED the UN appoint a Special Rapporteur to look into post-conflict Emirates violence in an extraordinary UN General Assembly session. 😂😂 Ridiculous. For a flicked football that wouldn’t harm a toddler. Every perceived slight is positioned as some “anti Arsenal” plot, by unnamed dark forces – perhaps it’s RADICAL ANTIFA 🤔

Ultimately Arsenal fans, this Citeh padding – which was admittedly very good – reminds me of the Wenger days when Arsenal would play pressure-free games against eg Fergie ManYoo around March, with the full knowledge that there’s no chance either team can win the title because Mourinho has it sown up already. Which always results in Arsenal’s best performances, the ones where there’s little pressure. Which is what that match was: in the cold light of day, when the Emirates InfoWars tinfoil-hat Massive are over their hangovers from that Emirates Kool-aid, there will be no getting away from the fact that Arteta has presided over yet another season of Failure.

The preseason objectives were clear: a PL title win, after coming close (and choking) twice. Every single bookie in the UK had Arsenal down as one of the 2 favourites for the title preseason. Liverpool (despite apparently having a World 11 Slot inherited, albeit one that finished behind Arsenal two years running, remember) were not in any equation. Every Arsenal fan was focused on Pep and Citeh, so overlooked were Liverpool. The fact that Slot has so effortlessly made a mockery of Arteta’s five years of PR FAKE PROCESS is an abject humiliation, and we all know it, we all see it. With the exception of those sipping on that Emirates kool-aid.

Arsenal are going to finish the season trophyless – again. And That is going to be the main talking point this May, not thrashing a finished Citeh. 🙄

MLS looks a sensational talent: why did Arteta spend nearly £50m on Calafiori? Having blown more on Zinchenko previously? How much on full backs is that! Yet the attack is totally lopsided. Arteta is going to win naff all this season. No amount of diversionary bollocks and hand-wringing can change that.

You can all talk as much shite about Haaland as you want but the reality is that at 24, he has won trophies nobody in that Arsenal squad will ever touch (CL, PL). Manager included. SHAME!

Stewie Griffin (Netflix FC)

Pedant corner

I’m a big fan of the BBC. It’s a wonderful institution that no matter how much Murdoch paid for Tories try to dismantle it, it continues to sit at the centre of the nation’s rich cultural heritage. However, it has followed football media to the depths of football baiting headlines.

‘Emphatic Arsenal put five past City to cut Liverpool’s lead’

Arsenal 5-1 Manchester City: Teenagers Nwaneri & Lewis-Skelly score as Gunners run riot – BBC Sport

Every weekend it’s the same. Just riling up, narrative driven nonsense that bares no relation to footballing reality. It’s been the same for a few seasons now. Arsenal have not cut Liverpool’s lead. The lead was 6 points. Now the lead is 6 points. No lead has been cut. The other way is just as bad. Team plays early and its team x goes 3 points clear. No they don’t. They’ve just played earlier in the day.

“Emphatic Arsenal put five past City to maintain breathing distance on Liverpool”. There you go. Fixed it. Still good narrative. Still got Arsenal, Liverpool and City in the same headline. And not bollocks.

Source