Football365

Tottenham warned against Tudor sack ‘mistake’ as Spurs make latest stance clear

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Tottenham warned against Tudor sack ‘mistake’ as Spurs make latest stance clear - Football365
Description

Alan Pardew has warned Tottenham against sacking Igor Tudor after their draw against Liverpool, while the club’s latest stance has been revealed.

Tottenham came from behind to snatch a 1-1 draw against the Reds in the 90th minute as Richarlison bundled the ball past Allison.

It ended Spurs’ run of four defeats in all competitions under their new interim boss after Tudor made the worst possible start at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium.

There have even been rumours that Tottenham are looking at managers to replace him with a report over the weekend claiming eight coaches are under consideration.

However, our friends at TEAMtalk have now revealed that Tudor is ‘safe’ for the time being with the result against Liverpool buying the Croatian ‘more time in charge as the club continues to assess the situation, with Spurs still planning for the future and weighing up potential successors’ to Thomas Frank.

And former West Ham boss Pardew thinks it would be a “mistake” to sack another manager before the end of the season, especially if you consider the next four Premier League matches coming up.

READ: 16 Conclusions from Liverpool 1-1 Tottenham: Richarlison, Ngumoha, Salah, Tudor, Slot and what next?

Tottenham will play Sunderland, Nottingham Forest, Brighton and Wolves in their next four Premier League fixtures and Pardew told talkSPORT: “I genuinely feel that it would be a mistake to make another change personally in the managerial front.

“When you look at the next four games, obviously that was a tough game away, they’ve got a draw. They’ve got Forest at home, Sunderland away, Brighton at home, Wolves away.

“Now, if you wanted four games in the Premier League that were not particularly taxing compared to what you could have, I would suggest they’re ok. So they’ve got a great chance.

“If they’re going to stick with him, then obviously this is the period he has to do the business in my opinion.

MORE TOTTENHAM COVERAGE ON F365…

* Richarlison helps Spurs avoid worst-case result as Tudor snatches draw at hopeless Liverpool

* Jamie Carragher destroys ‘not good enough’ Tottenham star causing ‘huge problems’

* Premier League sack race: Who will be ninth manager axed this season?

“The last four are not so easy. Aston Villa away, Leeds at home, Chelsea away, Everton at home. But I still don’t see Tottenham going down personally. I think they’ve got too much, I just do.

“I just think the games that they’ve got, the players and staff, although they were very, very short today, the European thing might end and that might do them a favour.”

When asked how he would approach Tottenham’s upcoming match against relegation rivals Nottingham Forest next weekend, Pardew added: “The manager hasn’t won yet, so he’s under a lot of pressure himself. You’ve got two teams under huge pressure.

“Your next two home games, there’s that old cliche about the team has to inspire the crowd and the crowd will then get behind the team etc. They need to, it feeds onto each other.

Source

Jamie Carragher destroys ‘not good enough’ Tottenham star causing ‘huge problems’

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Jamie Carragher destroys ‘not good enough’ Tottenham star causing ‘huge problems’ - Football365
Description

Jamie Carragher took shots at Guglielmo Vicario after Dominik Szoboszlai opened the scoring with a stunning free-kick in Tottenham Hotspur’s 1-1 draw with Liverpool, insisting the goalkeeper is simply ‘not good enough’.

Vicario returned to the Spurs starting line-up after Igor Tudor’s dismantling of Antonin Kinsky’s confidence when he hooked the young stopper just 17 minutes into his horror-show performance in the midweek 5-2 defeat to Atletico Madrid.

The 29-year-old Italy international had a point to prove after being dropped for the game in Spain, but things did not quite go as planned for relegation-threatened Tottenham at Anfield.

Szoboszlai made the breakthrough for hosts Liverpool in the 18th minute on Merseyside, with critics rounding on Vicario for failing to keep out the Hungarian’s 30-yard free-kick.

On first viewing, it looked as if Vicario had no chance at avoiding Liverpool’s opening goal, but replays showed that the shot-stopper got a decent hand to the ball, while it was also far from being in the corner of the goal.

That strike was the 11th Vicario has conceded from outside the box in the Premier League alone this season. Although, in all fairness, he did produce a stunning stop to deny Cody Gakpo later in the game before Richarlison’s equaliser rescued a point for Spurs to end Tudor’s four-game losing streak as interim coach.

READ: Richarlison helps Spurs avoid worst-case result as Tudor snatches draw at hopeless Liverpool

Speaking on commentary after Szoboszlai’s free-kick, Liverpool legend Carragher said: “We don’t see enough direct free-kicks scored in the Premier League these days but there’s absolutely no doubt that Liverpool have a free-kick specialist.

“He is a specialist but I tell you what, Tottenham don’t have a goalkeeping specialist.

“It’s not far off the middle of the goal, you’ve got to save that. Wow, that’s awful, absolutely shocking from the goalkeeper.

“Liverpool find themselves one goal in front thanks to their best player by a million miles this season.”

However, switching the focus back to the London side, Carragher claims ‘huge problems’ between the sticks will need fixing when the summer transfer window opens.

He added: “The reason the other fella’ [Kinsky] played in midweek was because he [Vicario] is not good enough.

“That’s what it was and then he ends up coming on in the game and it’s been well documented what happened.

“But Tottenham have got huge problems in goal.”

Former Liverpool and Spurs midfielder Jamie Redknapp was also heavily critical of Vicario for his mistake, telling Sky Sports: “This one [the Liverpool goal] I can’t help but look at the goalkeeper, his foot pattern is wrong. It’s a negative step to start, it’s a little one and then another little one instead of taking one big step. It’s just completely wrong.

“If you see someone trying to the high jump they aren’t going to go small steps, they’re going to big steps to get that trajectory and reach for it.

“He’s been poor but he made an unbelievable save from Gakpo to keep his side in it, when he palmed it onto the post. They’re big moments. In fairness, he reacted well and kept his side in when they needed him.”

Source

Tudor sack delayed, Slot sack inevitable as woeful Liverpool held by desperate Spurs

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Tudor sack delayed, Slot sack inevitable as woeful Liverpool held by desperate Spurs - Football365
Description

We all assumed we were watching Igor Tudor’s last game as Spurs manager. A forlorn commitment to fulfil Tottenham’s contractual obligation to turn up and be embarrassed at Anfield once a year, in order to spare any new manager the humiliation and unpleasantness.

Instead we ended it wondering how many more games Arne Slot has as Liverpool manager. Familiar nonsense from Richarlison, familiar nonsense from Liverpool and extremely unfamiliar resilience from crisis club and walking punchline Tottenham all combined to deliver a wildly unexpected 1-1 draw between two teams both, in their own differing ways, struggling desperately.

Let’s get into it. Because there was a lot of it.

You take a 1-0 lead early on against a team with no confidence or belief in itself. You then sit on that lead. You slowly but surely allow that moribund opposition to dare to dream, to believe the inevitable might only be the seemingly inevitable. That they might be able to do something about it.

You drift along apparently oblivious to the increasingly obvious peril in which you have unnecessarily placed yourself. You concede a late equaliser via some horrendously half-arsed and small-brained defending.

Even then you fail to wake up and could in the end even have conceded all three points instead of only dropping an infuriatingly avoidable two against a team haunted by relegation fears.

It’s a scenario we’ve seen play out in plenty of Spurs games over the last 15 years or so. But never this way round.

Whenever we make a serious prediction based on careful study, it is invariably wrong. When we try to be whimsical or absurd, we have an alarming success rate. Just look at how we were chortling it up in our Big Weekend preview of this.

Spurs are betting everything on the idea it will end up being worth throwing this game away – despite then having only eight games in which to save themselves from themselves – in the hope that allowing the new manager a free swing in a dead rubber against Atletico Madrid and then hoping against hope for a bounce in the gigantic pre-interlull six-pointer against Nottingham Forest is a better Hail Mary than trying anything at all at Anfield, where misery has been all but guaranteed for season after season anyway.

The counterpoint to that, of course, is that this is itself an unusually vulnerable and fragile Liverpool team. Among Spurs’ current direct rivals, Forest have won here while both Leeds and Burnley have left with a point.

When you think about it, the new rock-bottom Spurs might actually manage to find this weekend could be that they accidentally draw this game and the sacrificial manager survives.

And there it is. Igor Tudor survives. Time will tell whether Spurs really are better off for what happened here today.

Fate forced Tudor’s hand here, with the Croatian even admitting that until late in the preparation his plans for this one involved Conor Gallagher in midfield. When Gallagher’s illness proved stubborn enough to keep him out, Tudor had to change again having already been robbed of a dozen senior first-teamers for various reasons new and old, short-term and long.

What he very obviously got right here – and what would still have been correct even had it ended in another defeat – were the formation and gameplan. With only two players even approaching centre-backs available, Tudor finally admitted defeat and at last abandoned any ill-starred variation on his back five.

Here was a team that had almost as many square pegs in square holes as is possible with a squad operating at the very limits of availability. It was a four-four-f*cking-two if ever we saw one. And it worked.

This was, at last, the sort of performance Tudor was supposed to get out of Spurs. This was the Mr Fixit who was promised. Somewhere along the way, this unfamiliar team of players at least playing in familiar positions… worked.

Two big men up top? Worked. Two centre-backs at centre-back, and two full-backs at full-back? It worked. A Pape Sarr-Archie Gray midfield is a callow one indeed to take on Liverpool, but they held their own in what was at least for each of them individually a familiar part of the pitch.

Spurs are Spurs so they still had an 18-year-old left-back starting at right wing, but the point stands. Here, more through necessity it must be said than anything else, Tudor found a team of players who could all do the job they’d been given and would all give everything to the cause.

Astonishing that it seems so astonishing, but there we are.

Or that of Mathys Tel – a young player whose career has not turned out remotely the way he thought, who has been treated pretty shabbily by Spurs but yet remains among the most reliably and whole-heartedly committed of the entire squad.

Or that of Gray, just turned 20, and perhaps the only player who can look both a) at his own effort over the last month and b) Tel in the eye.

But Gray and Tel we know will be significantly involved over the weeks ahead. The bigger and thornier decisions concern Danso, Dragusin and those most conspicuous by their recent absence.

The biggest decision of Tudor’s resuscitated Spurs reign comes now: what does he do with Micky van de Ven and Cristian Romero?

Both have been liabilities for several weeks now. Neither has been a reliable leader. Both have got themselves stupidly suspended. Neither should see an automatic route back into this team.

Right now, in this situation, you’d certainly take Danso over either of them. It seems a mad thing to say, but he might now be the first name on the teamsheet, regardless of how many centre-backs Tudor picks.

That, of course, is the other big call for Tudor. We know he’s a back-three man. We’ve seen the painful outcome of his previous stubbornness in preferring that set-up. But we’ve now seen how much better Spurs are when a simpler option is chosen.

Which centre-backs he picks in the next two games, that’s a tricky decision. How many he picks should not be.

Really, the sheer potency of this situation was such pure essence of Richarlison that everything that happened here now looks like it simply had to happen.

A combination of Anfield Richarlison, World Cup-year Richarlison and relegation-scrap Richarlison is a heady brew of Richarlisons indeed.

He was a pest all day long, and is another easy pick for Tudor or whoever happens to be Spurs manager at any given moment for the rest of this run-in.

He is not the purest technician. He is not a keen and careful protector of the ball. More than once in a game where Spurs inevitably spent much of their day on the back foot he was dispossessed in dangerous positions.

But he remains one of the purest chaos merchants that the Premier League has to offer, and on days like this he becomes a force of nature. Liverpool should need no warning about Richarlison’s propensity for mischief in this fixture. Since joining Spurs he has now scored four goals in seven Premier League games against Liverpool for Spurs, and 21 Premier League goals in 88 games against everyone else.

Yet they failed to heed any of the many, many warnings served today. Twice in the closing minutes of the first half Richarlison had headed chances; one went narrowly wide, one smartly saved by Alisson.

Twice in the second half Alisson was again called into action to deny Richarlison his goal. But from Richarlison’s fourth shot on target – as many as Liverpool managed in total – the goal finally came.

It was the least convincing contact of the lot, which probably worked in his favour as the ball scuttled into the bottom corner with Alisson powerless this time.

It was nothing more than Spurs in general and Richarlison deserved. And he kept his shirt on, which is the one and only reason Liverpool didn’t score an even later winner when they had the chance to break Tottenham hearts with a breakaway in added time to added time. Seasoned Richarlison watchers will have feared for him, but not this time.

For all the talk that this could be a vital and transformative point for Spurs, it really might also be a complete illusion. This was a weekend when Spurs, Leeds, West Ham and Nottingham Forest all picked up a big point in the fight against relegation. By definition, one of those points will prove not to be that.

And it absolutely could be this one. In leaving Anfield with a point, Spurs have merely matched the effort of Leeds and fallen short of Nottingham Forest’s. Burnley too left here with a 1-1 draw.

Spurs are catastrophically bad, sure, but Liverpool are absolutely not good.

They were poor throughout this game, really. They were poor at 0-0, poor at 1-0, poor before their substitutions, poor after the substitutions and poor even after the ultimate wake-up call of Spurs’ late equaliser.

That one break after a Spurs corner deep, deep into added time aside, if anyone was going to find a dramatic late winner here it felt like it was going to be Spurs. And that’s just plain nutty.

With just a fraction more composure and quality to a final pass here or a cross there, Spurs might even be celebrating a first win of 2026 rather than merely a first point in six games. We also put it to you that no other football club that exists, has existed or ever will exist would have a record of two points from seven games and those two points be against Man City and Liverpool.

This was a Spurs team without its two starting centre-backs, its most experienced defensive midfielder, and which appeared to have kept the manager in charge purely to avoid a new manager having any bounce hopes scuppered by the expected and customary Anfield unpleasantness.

But Liverpool just never ever got going despite being given every opportunity to do so. Spurs had conceded at least two in each of their last 11 games against domestic opposition. For Liverpool away to be where that streak ends is a stain against this team, however less sh*t Spurs might have been.

The most damning assessment came from Jamie Carragher on Sky Sports commentary: “This Liverpool side have made Tottenham look like a decent team.”

No wonder there were boos at full-time.

We all came into this assuming it was Igor Tudor’s last game as Tottenham manager, but how many more does Slot have with Liverpool? If it goes wrong in midweek, does he even get the rest of this season?

Szoboszlai is, obviously, an elite free-kick taker. This was his fourth goal direct from a free-kick in this season’s Premier League; everyone else has 12 between them. But this was nowhere near his best effort. We’d wager he hasn’t in fact struck a weaker one.

Yet in it went as Vicario shuffled and then flapped.

Igor Tudor has faced plenty of criticism for his handling of the goalkeeper situation. For picking Toni Kinsky in the first place against Atletico Madrid and then hauling him off when it went so wrong. But it wasn’t a decision from a clear blue sky. Vicario has been unreliable all season.

This was the 11th goal Vicario has conceded from outside the penalty area this season; no other Premier League keeper has been beaten from that range more than seven times.

You expected them to seize control from that moment against such a wounded and vulnerable opponent. Yet they didn’t. They dominated possession but not in any compelling way, and it was Spurs who ended the half creating the more compelling chances despite not managing a touch in the Liverpool penalty area between the 11th and 43rd minutes.

He is, inevitably and obviously, still a very raw talent. But what a talent. He is already a nightmare to face up one-on-one, and it’s worth noting here that he had an unusual job among Liverpool players today: in Pedro Porro he was up against a seasoned senior pro playing in his normal and preferred position.

Porro, to his credit, stood up to the task. But Ngumoha was a clear and rare positive on an awkward afternoon for Liverpool and it’s not hard to see a future where he’s a more regular fixture in starting XIs.

Certainly, the presence of the likes of Ngumoha in the team could not be said to be the cause of Liverpool’s problems.

Because if anything they got worse after turning to their subs’ bench for Salah, Hugo Ekitike and Curtis Jones.

In so many ways, this was damning. Arne Slot, having shuffled his team more than he likes to, then went to his bench earlier than he wanted.

And yet on a day when Spurs’ bench pointedly contained two goalkeepers, three kids, some empty chairs and just two senior outfielders, it was the visitors who won the substitution battle, with Randal Kolo Muani providing the assist for Richarlison’s late leveller and Xavi Simons livelier than any of Liverpool’s own subs.

You could put Cristiano Ronaldo at Man United in the same group, frankly. Once-great players who became a burden with astonishing speed.

Both Ronaldo and Son took a drop down from Premier League standard. Salah is surely about to make the same journey once this season is done.

The goal was a shambles. A bog-standard route-one missile from Vicario which Kolo Muani didn’t even really compete for initially until Andy Robertson presented him with the ball. He was then able to take three touches into the Liverpool area unapproached before laying it into the path of Richarlison – also unmarked – to sweep home. Quite how such ordinary football had so easily undone Liverpool is not easily answered.

Yet it didn’t fall out of a clear blue sky. This was a team that seemed determined to take the easiest challenge currently available to a Premier League team and make it needlessly complicated. Liverpool opted to lift-and-coast their way through the game, and the goal when it came for Spurs didn’t even have the air of smash and grab about it. It was just a fair result from a game between two poor teams.

You felt that if Spurs were going to get something out of the game it actually, in a way, suited them to keep the game at 1-0 for as long as possible. A Spurs equaliser in, say, the 65th minute risked rousing Liverpool from their slumbers. But watching how injury-time panned out we’re not even sure that’s true. Liverpool were in a funk today and we’re not sure anything could have lifted them out of it.

It’s understandable for fans to think the team just has to turn up to win a game like this, but it’s not great that the players apparently felt that way too.

But a late Spurs goal was always the likeliest hiccup, if hiccups there were to be. Liverpool have now lost three and drawn one of their last eight Premier League games. The three winners and now this late equaliser they have conceded have all come in the 90th minute or later.

But for the visitors it does feel like it could be the catalyst for something. Spurs have been desperate for a moment, for something, for anything, to give them the belief better days could be ahead.

This might in the end prove as illusory as the comeback point against Man City. But for now it is something. Spurs have something to hold on to, a couple of days’ respite where they will not be the butt of everyone’s jokes, and genuine reason to believe they can beat the drop. At least until they pick a back five and find themselves 3-0 down with a man sent off after 20 minutes against Nottingham Forest next weekend.

Tudor won’t avoid the jokes, though. He may still have his job, he may have a Premier League point but he is never beating the banter charges. Not while he’s going about thinking a Spurs staffer minding his pre-match business is in fact Arne Slot.

He even tried to alpha him in classic schoolboy fashion before realising his mistake. Even on a good day, Spurs still don’t win and are still Spurs. Maybe Tudor really does belong here after all.

Source

point mire after Leeds screwed by Gudmundsson red card

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Leeds, Nottm Forest draw to tie Spurs with 18th and 17th - Football365
Description

There were two huge games in the Premier League relegation battle on Sunday afternoon, before Tottenham Hotspur’s terrifying trip to Anfield.

Nottingham Forest, 18th, who played in the Europa League on Thursday, hosted Fulham. Leeds United, 15th, were at Crystal Palace, who played in the Europa Conference League on Thursday.

Both clubs with European exploits would have had their minds on their last-16 second legs.

That played into Leeds’ hands, as Palace are all but safe, but meant Forest would find it tough against a very unpredictable Fulham side, who were knocked out of the FA Cup by second-tier Southampton in their most recent outing.

Starting with Palace vs Leeds, where there were undoubtedly more talking points, or at least one significant talking point across two games with a combined zero goals, it was a tale of six fateful minutes for Daniel Farke’s side at the end of the first half.

Both games were rubbish. Both games did the ‘Premier League is boring’ defenders no good. Both games were entirely forgettable, but a decent point on the road for Leeds considering they played the entire second period with 10 men.

It really depends which way you look at it. Palace played on Thursday, aren’t very good this season, have a manager who hates everyone and everything, and, most importantly, Leeds missed a penalty.

MORE FEATURES ON F365

* Next Salah? Ranking 10 Liverpool options tipped to replace legendary winger

* Haaland must be dropped after least convincing Guardiola U-turn imaginable

* Arteta shows massive balls with title-clinching Dowman sub as Arsenal make history

As the second half drew to a close, Eagles captain Will Hughes decided he was playing volleyball at a corner, and Dominic Calvert-Lewin stepped up to shoot wide of Walter Benitez’s goal.

It was an abysmal, rushed spot-kick from a reliable player, yet it wasn’t the most miserable thing to happen before half time.

Another one of Leeds’ more reliable players, Gabriel Gudmundsson, was sent off for a second bookable offence in the sixth minute of injury time.

Referee Thomas Bramall carded Gudmundsson and seemed to forget the Leeds defender was already on a yellow, which resulted in a sheepishly given red card.

Only Ismaila Sarr, who was the one fouled, seemed to remember, and had Bramall remembered, he probably wouldn’t have brandished a second yellow.

You could just tell it wouldn’t have been a booking had Gudmundsson’s 27th-minute yellow been on his mind, which reaffirms what we already knew: the threshold for first and second yellows are absolutely different in the mind of a Premier League referee.

Some might think that’s right, others might think that’s wrong. But a carded Brennan Johnson getting away with one in the second half was an alarming lack of consistency on a day that left Leeds fans fuming.

Ultimately, they held on to a point and will take solace from that, especially after Jefferson Lerma had a late winner disallowed for offside against that man Johnson.

It’s a point further away from the relegation zone, which is currently occupied by Wolverhampton Wanderers, Burnley, and West Ham United.

Leeds sit on 32 points after 30 games, three points above West Ham, Nottingham Forest, and Tottenham, who play Liverpool later on Sunday.

Forest join Spurs and the Hammers on 29 points after their goalless draw against Fulham.

Dan Ndoye had a goal disallowed in the second half for the narrowest of offsides you’ll see, which would have been gargantuan for Forest and Spurs.

It’s now over to Spurs at Anfield. Eek.

It’s not the absolute worst pair of results in the world for them, but they still look like the worst of the four teams fighting against each other to avoid 18th, above Burnley and Wolves.

The two teams above and the three below Spurs all drew this weekend, and while the immediate focus is obviously on this Liverpool game, it’s hard not to think about Forest’s trip to north London next week.

What a game to go into the international break.

Source

Tudor sack: Spurs 'emergency' appointment plans revealed as double rejection blow, four top targets surface

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Spurs 'emergency' manager appointment plans revealed amid double rejection blow as four top targets named - Football365
Description

Tottenham Hotspur are reportedly planning to make an ’emergency’ manager appointment, but they have already been rejected by two targets.

Spurs recently brought in Igor Tudor to replace Thomas Frank, but this has proven a disastrous appointment for the relegation candidates.

Under Tudor, Spurs have lost their last four matches against Arsenal, Fulham, Crystal Palace and Atletico Madrid, with reports in recent days claiming the head coach could lose his job if his side loses against Liverpool on Sunday.

Respected journalist David Ornstein revealed on Friday that the north London club are ‘actively working’ on appointing a new manager, so they could have a new boss in the dugout for next weekend’s relegation six-pointer against Nottingham Forest.

On Saturday morning, talkSPORT claimed Man Utd have ‘sounded out’ up to eight possible candidates to replace Tudor, but they have since added that they will not appoint Roberto De Zerbi before the summer.

READ: Liverpool vs Tottenham predictions: Igor Tudor to be sacked after fifth Spurs defeat

De Zerbi has been out of work since leaving Marseille earlier this year and is widely reported to be a leading target to be Tottenham’s next long-term boss, with Mauricio Pochettino another option.

However, talkSPORT are reporting that he has ‘no plans to return to management before the end of the season’, and this leaves them with four targets.

The report claims:

‘De Zerbi is on Tottenham’s list of potential targets as they are set to sack interim Igor Tudor. It means that Spurs are down a candidate to come in and save them in their relegation battle in the Premier League.

‘Sean Dyche is a possible option, while ex-boss Mauricio Pochettino, Ryan Mason and Robbie Keane are options too.’

As mentioned, Dyche is a candidate for Spurs, and a report from Football Insider’s Pete O’Rourke claims they are targeting an ’emergency replacement’ for Tudor.

But O’Rourke also claims Dyche’s ‘stance’ on joining Spurs is that he is not keen on taking the position.

O’Rourke explained: “If they have to make a change and replace Igor Tudor so early, they’re going to have to make a decision quickly.

“And I think they’ll want somebody who’s used to being in a relegation fight.

“Obviously, Sean Dyche has that on a CV.

“He’s been a firefighter in previous jobs and has a proven track record of keeping teams in the Premier League, he kept Burnley and Everton up.

“He would’ve ticked a lot of boxes being out of work as well, but he is believed to be unwilling to take the role as Tottenham boss.”

Source

Tudor sack: Tottenham 'consider eight options' as Slot tipped to be next Spurs manager on one condition

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Tottenham 'consider eight options' as Tudor sack looms; Slot tipped to be next manager on one condition - Football365
Description

Liverpool boss Arne Slot has been tipped to be the next Tottenham manager on one condition, while Spurs are ‘considering eight options’.

Spurs could make another manager change in the coming weeks as current boss Igor Tudor has had a dire start, losing all four of his games in charge.

It was initially reported that Tudor would be given until the March international break to improve Tottenham’s situation, but the manner of his side’s midweek 5-2 loss to Atletico Madrid has forced a change in their thinking.

On Friday night, respected journalist David Ornstein revealed Spurs are ‘actively working on options’ to replace Tudor and they could make a change if/when they lose to Liverpool on Sunday afternoon.

After Liverpool, Tottenham’s remaining games before the next international break are the home second leg against Atletico Madrid and a relegation six-pointer against Nottingham Forest.

READ: Liverpool vs Tottenham predictions: Igor Tudor to be sacked after fifth Spurs defeat

Despite Tudor’s embarrassing start at Spurs, Paul Merson has explained why he is not surprised that he did not get dismissed after the loss to Atletico Madrid.

“I am and I’m not.I am because of the results and I’m not because it’s Liverpool away,” Merson said on Sky Sports.

“I don’t know what manager would want to come in for that game. There are timings – I think they will wait until this game is over and it gives them another week then before the big game.”

And Merson has also named struggling Liverpool boss Slot as a candidate to join Spurs in a warning to the Dutchman.

“He will have to get in the top four, I would have thought, otherwise he’d be [the next] Tottenham manager,” Merson claimed.

“If he won the FA Cup but didn’t finish in Champions League positions it wouldn’t make any difference at all. I think Liverpool have got to get in the Champions League with the [financial] fair play rule.

“The more you get into the Champions League, the better quality player you can bring in.”

Slot would realistically only be an option for Spurs in the summer and if the north London side avoids relegation from the Premier League.

And a report from talkSPORT claims Spurs are ‘considering eight options’ to replace Tudor before the end of this campaign, with the head coach ‘informed’ of his situation.

The report explains:

Tottenham are sounding out up to eight names to replace Igor Tudor as manager. TalkSPORT understands that Tudor has already been informed that Spurs are looking at other options.

‘One of the reasons for transparency is to try and bring forward the search for a permanent boss, the club are aware this is difficult but has not been ruled out.’

Source

Liverpool vs Tottenham: predictions, expected line

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Liverpool vs Tottenham: predictions, expected line-ups, how to watch and stats - Football365
Description

Liverpool fans won’t forget this same fixture last season when, in the late April sunshine, the Reds thumped Tottenham 5-1 to clinch the Premier League title.

It’s a very different story this time with Arne Slot’s side in sixth and battling hard to claim a Champions League spot for 2026/27.

But if they’re looking for accommodating opponents to help them achieve that goal, step forward Spurs.

Tottenham are in freefall. They’ve lost six matches in a row for the first time in history and Igor Tudor is under pressure to keep his job, having lost all four of his games.

When it appears things can’t get any worse, Tottenham prove they can.

A series of disastrous errors in midweek led to a 5-2 thumping away to Atletico Madrid and they’ve shipped 14 goals in their last four games.

Then again, it was hardly a midweek to remember for Liverpool either. They lost their Champions League last-16 first-leg tie 1-0 away to Galatasaray.

How to watch Liverpool v Tottenham

Liverpool v Tottenham kicks off at 16:30 GMT on Sunday, March 15 at Anfield.

The game will be shown live on Sky Sports Main Event & Sky Sports Premier League, with coverage starting from 16:00.

BBC Radio 5 Live will provide full match commentary.

Liverpool team news

Arne Slot reported on Friday morning that goalkeeper Alisson could be back in time after missing the last two matches with a muscle injury.

Giorgi Mamardashvili stands by if Slot decides the game will come too soon for the Brazilian.

Federico Chiesa missed the trip to Galatasaray but could be back following an illness to give the Reds another attacking option from the bench.

Conor Bradley, Wataru Endo and Giovanni Leoni are out for the rest of the campaign, while Alexander Isak continues his rehabilitation following a fractured fibula and ankle problem sustained in the reverse fixture against Tottenham in December.

Liverpool expected line-up

(4-2-3-1) Alisson; Gomez, Konate, Van Dijk, Kerkez; Gravenberch, Mac Allister; Salah, Szoboszlai, Wirtz; Ekitike.

Tottenham team news

Spurs have suffered with injuries all season and Mohammed Kudus, Dejan Kulusevski, James Maddison, Wilson Odobert, Lucas Bergvall, Ben Davies, Destiny Udogie and Rodrigo Bentancur all remain sidelined.

To make matters worse, defender Micky van de Ven is suspended due to his red card in the 3-1 defeat to Crystal Palace.

Tudor will also be without both Cristian Romero and Joao Palhinha after they clashed heads in the heavy defeat to Atletico.

Yves Bissouma has been ruled out with a muscle injury and Conor Gallagher is a doubt as he battles a fever, although the January signing is likely to feature.

Tudor confirmed that Guglielmo Vicario will replace Antonin Kinsky in between the sticks after the latter made two mistakes against Atletico.

Tottenham expected line-up

(4-2-3-1) Vicario; Porro, Danso, Dragusin; Spence, Gallagher, Sarr; Kolo Muani, Simons, Tel; Solanke.

Liverpool v Tottenham stats

– Liverpool have lost just one of their last 31 home league games against Tottenham (W21 D9), and are unbeaten in 14 (W10 D4) since a 2-0 loss in May 2011.

– Tottenham have won just one of their last 16 Premier League games against Liverpool (D3 L12), losing the last four in a row since a 2-1 home win in September 2023.

– Liverpool vs Tottenham is the highest-scoring fixture in Premier League history, with 209 goals. Liverpool have scored 127 of these.

– Liverpool have lost nine Premier League games this season, more than they did in 2023-24 (4) and 2024-25 (4) combined (8). The Reds last suffered 10+ defeats in a league season in 2015-16 (10), and last did so under a single manager in 2014-15 under Brendan Rodgers (12).

– Tottenham have lost each of their last five Premier League games; only in February 1994 (7) and November 2004 (6) have they ever suffered 6+ successive defeats in their league history.

– Only Sunderland (25) have seen fewer goals in the first halves of their Premier League games this season than Liverpool (28 – 16 for, 12 against). On the other hand, Liverpool’s second halves have produced a league-high 59 goals (32 for, 27 against).

– Tottenham are the only side without a Premier League win so far in 2026, drawing four and losing seven of their 11 games.

– Liverpool’s Mo Salah has scored 16 goals in his career against Tottenham in all competitions (14 for Liverpool, 1 for Fiorentina, 1 for Basel), his joint-most against a single opponent (also 16 v Manchester United).

– Richarlison has been involved in more Premier League goals against Liverpool than any other opponent (8 – 5 goals, 3 assists), including five in five games with Spurs (3 goals, 2 assists).

Liverpool v Tottenham predictions

Liverpool continue to prove hit and miss. But at least that’s better than Spurs who are miss and miss.

After suffering six straight defeats, it’s hard to see how that streak doesn’t extend to seven.

Tottenham are in a complete mess and this is where the Tudor era could end.

Liverpool are extremely short at 1/3 so the bet here could be backing Liverpool to win and both teams to score.

Despite a series of woeful results, Spurs are still managing to find the net at some point in matches. They banked two goals in Madrid and have scored in 23 of their last 26 games.

Liverpool to win and both teams to score is 17/10.

Florian Wirtz has four goals in his last nine Premier League games and could easily have bagged a couple against Galatasaray.

The classy German will certainly relish the chance to punch a hole in this woeful Spurs backline. Wirtz to score anytime and both teams to score pays 5/1 if you’re playing a Bet Builder.

Source

Merson reveals only reason Tudor hasn’t been sacked by Tottenham after Ornstein update

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Merson reveals only reason Tudor hasn’t been sacked by Tottenham after Ornstein update - Football365
Description

Tottenham would have already sacked Igor Tudor if Spurs didn’t have to face Liverpool at Anfield in their next match, according to Paul Merson.

Tudor replaced Thomas Frank in the middle of February with Tottenham in terrible form before the Dane was sacked by the north London club.

Tottenham have not improved under Tudor with the Croatian interim boss losing all four of his matches in charge of the club.

Spurs are now in serious danger of being relegated from the Premier League with Tudor’s side just one point ahead of the Premier League’s drop zone.

Their 5-2 loss against Atletico Madrid marked a new low after Tudor decided to start young goalkeeper Antonin Kinsky in one of the biggest matches of the season, before deciding to substitute him after just 17 minutes with Tottenham 3-0 down.

The Athletic‘s David Ornstein revealed on Friday night that Tottenham ‘are actively working on options to replace’ Tudor if Spurs lose to Liverpool on Sunday.

READ: Why Leeds will go down over Tottenham, Kinsky case study, and f*** the celebrity circus in the EFL

Ornstein added: ‘Spurs are contingency planning for the event of bringing Tudor’s reign to an end following the Anfield trip.’

When asked if he was shocked that Tudor was still in charge of Tottenham, Merson told Sky Sports: “I am and I’m not.I am because of the results and I’m not because it’s Liverpool away.

“I don’t know what manager would want to come in for that game. There are timings – I think they will wait until this game is over and it gives them another week then before the big game.”

Put to him that a new manager could have seen a trip to Liverpool as a free hit, Merson replied bluntly: “No. Who did we see it with, Ange (Postecoglou)? At Forest? he took it at Arsenal, they got ripped to shreds and it was the start of going down. It’s not a free hit at all, you come in and get beat three or four and it’s, ‘what has he done?’.

MORE TOTTENHAM COVERAGE ON F365…

* Leicester collapse is the warning sign Spurs, West Ham and Forest all ignored

* Tottenham: Tudor reveals injury, illness hammer blows as Spurs can ‘cry or fight’

* Vinai Venkatesham fires clear shots at Daniel Levy’s running of Tottenham in worrying ‘sales’ update

“I think they will wait and I’ll be shocked if he’s manager next week against Nottingham Forest.”

Tottenham interim boss Tudor insists that the rumours that he could be replaced make him “laugh” as the reality would just be “hope” that things will change.

Tudor told Sky Sports on Friday: “People think a new coach will come in and things will change and the problems will resolve. It makes me laugh.

“When people want a new coach, it’s a new hope. People always want new hope that things will change but the reality is totally different. The reality is not that.

“In this world where everyone has an opinion, you can never win. But as coaches we have to focus on what we can change. We need to stay calm and believe in ourselves.”

Source

Why Leeds will go down over Tottenham, Kinsky case study, and f*** the celebrity circus in the EFL

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Why Leeds will go down over Tottenham, Kinsky case study, and f*** the celebrity circus in the EFL - Football365
Description

The Mailbox reckons Leeds United are the most likely club to take 18th place in the Premier League as Tottenham will ‘wake up soon’.

Plus, we have an Antonin Kinsky case study after his nightmare against Atletico Madrid, why only three clubs are likely to win the Champions League and some are not happy with Ryan Reynolds and Rob McElhenney doing alternative commentary of Wrexham versus Swansea.

Send your thoughts to theeditor@football365.com

Goalkeepers, Confidence, and the Kinsky Case Study

Watching Antonín Kinský against Atlético Madrid was a reminder of something that rarely gets discussed properly outside goalkeeping circles: confidence is not just helpful for a goalkeeper — it is the position’s operating system.

When a striker loses confidence, he might snatch at chances or hesitate in the box. When a defender loses confidence, he might drop a yard deeper or play it safe. But when a goalkeeper loses confidence, the entire defensive structure starts to wobble because the goalkeeper’s decisions affect everything: positioning, command of the area, communication, distribution, and even how brave the back line feels.

Kinský’s performance was a textbook example of that erosion happening in real time.

Early in the match, you could see the hesitation. Crosses that normally would be claimed were punched. Punches that should have been confident became half-measures. His starting positions looked uncertain — sometimes a step too deep, sometimes oddly aggressive. And the moment a goalkeeper starts second-guessing himself, the whole game speeds up around him.

Goalkeeping is the one position where doubt multiplies instantly. A striker can miss three chances and still score the fourth. A goalkeeper doesn’t get that luxury. One moment of uncertainty can spiral because the next decision arrives within seconds.

You could see it in the body language. The shoulders drop slightly. The set position becomes rigid instead of reactive. Instead of reading the game, the goalkeeper begins anticipating mistakes — his own.

And the cruel thing is that confidence for a goalkeeper is rarely rebuilt during a game. Once it slips, every action becomes heavier. A routine catch feels like a test. Every shot feels like an exam.

It reminded me of that famous line from Rocky Balboa: “It ain’t about how hard you hit. It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.” For goalkeepers, that resilience is everything. They live in a psychological environment where mistakes are public, immediate and often decisive.

The best goalkeepers — the Buffons, Neuers, van der Sars — have that almost irrational certainty about them. Even after mistakes, they still attack crosses, still command their area, still play with the same authority. Confidence for them isn’t just form; it’s identity.

What Kinský’s night showed is how fragile that identity can be when things start going wrong.

And it’s why goalkeeping might be the most psychological position in football. You’re the last line of defence, the first point of attack, and the only player on the pitch whose mistake usually ends up on the scoreboard.

When confidence goes, everything goes with it.

Gaptoothfreak, Man. Utd., New York (René Higuita was oozing confidence when he made that scorpion save back in ’95)

EPL is tougher, if not better

There/s a lot of noise implying Arsenal won’t be worthy winners of the Prem this year, if they manage to cross the line ahead of the rest. And, of course, this was given a boost with this week’s performances in Europe. Summarized as, the Prem is really shit, so that makes Arsenal, who may win the Prem pretty shit too.

The first ‘myth’ is that a league can only get stronger because the historic best teams are stronger – in this case, trashing teams in Europe – is just one perspective.

But what if it’s because the rest of the league—the other 14 teams—have improved dramatically? Making it much harder for the ‘best’ teams to dominate, to play the way they want to, and not force them to change style or find new ways to win.

At the same time, having to play tougher league games throughout the season takes its toll on those ‘best’ teams. It’s no coincidence that the English teams in the CL were winning easily and securing many of the top-8 positions in the CL first round while they were still relatively fresh. But the winter season is always tough in the Prem – something Klopp discovered.

If you watch any games from the other top 5 leagues in Europe, you can see how relatively uncompetitive these leagues are. The Premier League money gap is so huge that teams guaranteed relegation continue to fight all the way because the rewards are substantial, but the downside is a massive chasm. Relegated in Serie A, Bundesliga, La Liga, or Ligue 1? The gap isn’t so great. Maybe going down for one season isn’t so bad.

The reality is that any team that wins the Premier League deserves it. Being better than the rest over 38 games, playing everyone home and away, living with the same rules and yet still managing to top the league. And generally doing well across 4 fronts too.

The Premier League is definitely tougher. It makes it a slog for the teams vying for the top, especially with almost constant midweek football. Time to lay off Arsenal (not a fan.)

Paul McDevitt

Place your bets!

I was having a chat with friends about football over drinks (as you do), and the subject of predicting the Champions League winner for 2026 inevitably came up. I decided to do some digging which has thrown up some pretty interesting observations, the simplest of which was that in order to win, you most likely needed to have been at least semi-finalists the year before.

Here’s the run-down of the winners from the last 10 years, and their final positions the year prior to winning.

Only twice in the past 10 years has any team won without being at least semi-finalists the year before.

Even then, Bayern had form by being semi-finalists two years prior, while Chelsea were the only real dark-horses, having gone out in the Round of 16 both years prior to winning.

Of the teams remaining this year, 3 of them were in the semi-finals last year – Arsenal, Barcelona and eventual winners PSG.

If you’re a betting person, there’s an 80% chance your eventual winners will be one of these 3 teams (based on 8 of the last 10 winners being semi-finalists the year prior). There’s a 10% chance of it being Bayern who were quarter-finalists in 2025 and semi-finalists in 2024, slightly bettering their own form prior to winning in 2020. And there’s a 10% chance of it being Real Madrid due to the sheer weight of experience (quarters in 2025, winners in 2024, semi’s in 2023, winners in 2022, semi’s in 2021), not to mention being champions 5 times in the last 10 years.

Anyone else is going to be the longest shot underdogs simply due to their lack of experience in handling the pressure at the business end of the tournament.

Sanjit (would love a Bodø/Glimt underdog story though!) Randhawa, Kuala Lumpur.

The Case For Relegation

There are 4 teams in realistic danger of relegation, and so I wanted to make the case for each of them as I think it’s quite an intriguing battle down there. I find it really hard to make a convincing case that any of them will go down, though of course, one has to.

We can delve in to the underlying stats and tactics etc of each team, but those things should only be considered in things like Champions League two-legged ties, and top of the table conversations; the teams at the bottom aren’t deserving of those kind of discussions as relegation is a vibes-based thing.

West Ham: Currently 18th

The FA Cup 3rd Round weekend was a turning point — it was when Taty and Pablo came in, and enabled Summerville to start being good and let Nuno do what he wants to do with his front line. Plus Disasi being the no-nonsense antidote to the all-nonsense Kilman. Before that point, 14 points from 21 games. Since then 14 points from 8 games. That’s 1.75 points a game over a good sample size, translating to 66.5 points over a season. Only 2 losses away at Chelsea and Liverpool, scoring twice in each (though admittedly conceding 3 & 5). Everyone looking happy in a group photo in the dressing room post Brentford FA Cup win. Everyone seems to be pulling in the right direction. They’ve clicked, they’ll be fine, on that form could even bridge the gap up to 14th. Admittedly I’m a fan, but I know the patterns of our club, and this mirrors early days of Moyes Mk.2.

Forest: Currently 17th

Since Vitor has come in they’ve only picked up a single point from 3 games in the league. But I truly think they pass the eye test. Losing to Brighton isn’t ideal, but their performance in the Liverpool loss was actually excellent, and then to get a score draw away at the Etihad is really impressive. Plus that handsome Fenerbahce away win. I think that once their fixtures start to get a bit nicer that they’ve got enough to get themselves maybe 3 wins, taking them to 37pts, and maybe the odd draw might keep them safe. Of their remaining 9 games I’d only look at Chelsea and United away as being games that they can probably write off. The others (even Villa, Fulham and Bournemouth) are the kind of games that scrapping teams will consider winnable with backs against the wall.

Spurs: Currently 16th

Honestly, Spurs going down would bring me happier tears than when Leicester won the league. I’d even love to see Arsenal win the league to compound their misery, and for it all to happen on May Bank Holiday so fans of all other London clubs can gather for a celebratory drink at Seven Sisters station. They’re on their worst ever run of form in the Premier League Era, and their worst winless streak in 91 years. So it would seem to make them favourites. However…again, based on vibes and history, whenever I want something bad to happen to a Big 6 team, they all eventually find some muscle memory and turn it around quite quickly. After all, in 2019 they decreed that they were too good for the Champions League and tried to break away. So I’m expecting them to wake up soon and remember who they are; they could easily beat Brighton, Wolves and Leeds.

Leeds: Currently 15th

Leeds have been just about touching competent all season, not ever being bad, not ever particularly catching the eye for being great. They were heavily tipped to go back down due to A) Daniel Farke, and B) their own recent history. So this kind of quiet, steady competence is actually really promising for Leeds and their fans should be happy. But…it’s not been enough to get them in amongst that mid-table set; they’re 6 points away from the team above them, and one game week could see them in the drop zone albeit with a big GD swing. In a relegation run-in you need a bit of momentum, and their good and bad results have been spread too thinly all season, and I don’t know if they’ll find the fight to pull themselves fully clear. Plus they have to play 2 of the others, both of which are seeing Leeds as winnable.

Honourable Mention: Brighton, Currently 14th

They’re 9 points above it. But Hurzeler is a bit of a snivelling dweeb, and no one realistically knows or cares about them or any of their players; as far as I’m concerned, they’re simply a bunch of baristas who play midfield. Their results are always impossible to predict, and always have been, they’re basically just a CPU-controlled team that only exist to provide notable results against more popular teams (eg the odd battering of United, or letting Palace play themselves back in to form). Their remaining games are not easy. By their very nature, they could win/draw/lose any of them, and no one other than their fans will notice until GW37.

Final Verdict: While 4 of the teams are not easy to like, so will provide a lot of enjoyment for neutrals if they go down, it wouldn’t surprise me if Brighton, the team no one cares about, go down (see also Man City always winning and no one caring). BUT — it will ultimately be Leeds United who I’m putting my fiver on to go down. The others have momentum or muscle memory, and Brighton’s week-by-week random dice-roll results will see them through.

Sam

READ: Leicester collapse is the warning sign Spurs, West Ham and Forest all ignored

F*** the celebrity circus

I’ve just seen that Ryan Reynolds and Rob McElhenney will be doing an alternative commentary for the Wrexham vs Swansea game on Sky Sports.

Apparently the normal commentary will still exist on another channel, which is something at least, but the fact Sky are even doing this tells you exactly where football broadcasting is drifting. The Wrexham story has already become more about a television show than a football club, and this feels like the next step in turning actual matches into a ridiculous celebrity sideshow.

It’s already embarrassing enough that whenever Wrexham appear on television we have to endure the presenters rolling out the same tired lines about how “a touch of Hollywood has arrived in [insert town here] today.” The football almost feels like a supporting act to the narrative.

Wrexham’s owners are actors, Swansea now has Snoop Dogg involved, and Sky are leaning straight into the spectacle because they know it pulls in viewers who might never normally watch a Championship game. From a marketing point of view I understand why they’re doing it. From a football point of view it’s embarrassing.

It’s easy to laugh this off as a novelty, but things like this have a habit of becoming normal once broadcasters realise it generates clicks and attention. Today it’s Reynolds and McElhenney commentating on their own club. Tomorrow it’ll be influencer watch-alongs, celebrity pundit panels, and whatever other gimmick someone in a production meeting thinks will play well on social media.

Football used to manage perfectly well with commentators who actually did the job professionally and broadcasts that focused on the game rather than whoever happens to have bought a small stake in a club. This sort of stunt just reinforces the feeling that the sport is slowly being repackaged as entertainment content rather than treated as a competition.

Perhaps I’m just old-fashioned, but it’s hard not to feel that this is only the beginning.

Ant MUFC (Awaiting the day Sky hand Avram Glazer and Jim Ratcliffe the microphones for a United game)

Yes and no

System over individuals you say? Last season two direct free kicks scored for the first time ever and none since by a 100mil midfielder?

When there is high intensity and physicality, there is no room for technical prowess. A little bit of slowness is needed sometimes. Especially this season, all teams in pl are playing in a similar way so your best game might be conditioned to something else. Similar to a top team in the French league. Sure, competition might be higher but it is on a different game.

Or maybe I’m wrong. It was indeed the system which made Rice punch two holes. Similar to the system which had Pitarch, Diaz making rare starts at home give us a win.

Of all the matchups, Arsenal were the most outplayed. Liverpool a close second.

Madrid fan

Transfer merry-go-round

As we already have the managerial merry-go round, I thought it an excellent suggestion by Mark for a managerial transfer window.

We could see Arse-ball binned in the January transfer window by say Don Carlo, to get them over the line.

Source

Spurs, West Ham and Nottingham Forest all ignored biggest Premier League warning

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Spurs, West Ham and Forest could tumble towards League One like Leicester - Football365
Description

Relegation is becoming more dangerous than ever. Leicester City’s collapse shows why. Just ten years after lifting the Premier League trophy, the club now face the possibility of dropping into League One following a six-point deduction.

Their demise is a real warning for West Ham, Nottingham Forest and Tottenham, who are currently split by just one point. Being Too Good To Go Down often means high wages and a squad unsustainable without Premier League wealth.

Leicester’s relegation to the Championship in 2022/23 was completely unexpected. Brendan Rodgers had led the team to eighth the year prior, following fifth and FA Cup glory in 2021. Having established themselves as a top-half team, there were clear intentions to build further.

Those investments amplified the sudden relegation. Leicester had a £107million wage bill – unprecedented in England’s second tier. Losing Premier League revenue soon pushed the club into breach of the profit and sustainability rules.

Much like Leicester in 2023, this season’s relegation rivals were all expected to fight for European positions. Tottenham are the reigning Europa League champions; Nottingham Forest finished seventh last season; West Ham are just three years removed from Europa Conference League glory. Yet they are operating with the 7th, 9th and 13th-highest wage bills in the league respectively. Whichever club goes down will need to cut those figures significantly.

Leicester were not the first club to suffer a relegation against the odds. West Ham were viewed as Too Good To Go Down in 2003. Yet they bounced back within two years and managed to avoid the detrimental effects Leicester are enduring.

The landscape changed dramatically between those relegations. The financial gulf between England’s top two divisions is now wider than ever. As a result, the likelihood of breaching the rules has never been higher.

One of Leicester’s reported mistakes was failing to insert relegation wage drop clauses. The perceived lack of relegation threat may have been a similar oversight among the current crop.

The revenue-generating Tottenham Hotspur Stadium and cost-effective lease of the London Stadium may protect their inhabitants. Forest, however, will likely find it harder to offset their wage bill. The negative effects on each club can only be limited by how much they have future-proofed for worst-case scenarios.

In the modern Premier League, relegation is no longer just a setback; it is a financial cliff edge. And the higher a club climbs before it falls, the harder the landing becomes. It is perhaps most damning of English football’s structure that a club like Leicester were effectively penalised for their ambition.

In this era, the weight of relegation is only compounded by past success.

Source