Enfield Dispatch

‘Nothing happening’ with Whitewebbs House, say Spurs

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
‘Nothing happening’ with Whitewebbs House, say Spurs - Enfield Dispatch
Description

Recent national media reports had suggested Tottenham Hotspur was planning a move to acquire the historic building’s lease, but the club denies this

Tottenham Hotspur Football Club has said that “nothing is happening” regarding Whitewebbs House amid speculation around the building’s future.

Following the controversial felling of an ancient oak tree by Toby Carvery, the current occupants of the 18th Century building within Whitewebbs Park, The Guardian revealed last month that Spurs “had entered into an option arrangement” for the site with Mitchells & Butlers (M&B) plc, the pub company which operates Toby Carvery.

Multiple national media reports of the ancient oak felling also highlighted the financial ties between the football club’s owners Enic and M&B, with both companies sharing the same largest shareholder, the family trust of businessman Joe Lewis, while Josh Levy, son of Spurs chairman Daniel Levy, sits on the board of M&B.

Even though M&B admitted felling the 450-year-old Whitewebbs oak, citing health and safety grounds, the financial and personal ties between the two companies led many to speculate online over whether Tottenham Hotspur had any involvement.

In response to The Guardian article, a Spurs spokesperson said it was “ridiculous” to suggest the tree was felled to make the land easier to develop.

This week, the Dispatch asked the Premier League club to simply confirm or deny whether it was intending to acquire the lease on Whitewebbs House.

A spokesperson responded: “We have nothing to say on this as nothing is happening.”

The ancient oak tree was situated on the edge of the car park for the existing Toby Carvery on land leased to M&B by Enfield Council. Because the council’s permission had not been sought for the felling, however, the civic centre has since said it is considering legal action against the company, while also issuing emergency tree preservation orders (TPOs) for the remaining trees across the site.

Tottenham Hotspur won planning approval from the council’s planning committee in February for its contentious women’s and girls’ football academy at Whitewebbs Park on land immediately adjacent to Whitewebbs House.

Some of the speculation around the felled tree concerned a previously-proposed access road being built through Whitewebbs Wood, however this road did not run through the area of the ancient oak tree and, in any case, councillors at February’s committee voted to remove the access road from the Spurs plans.

Meanwhile, a petition launched via Change.org demanding “justice for the Whitewebbs oak” is now nearing 50,000 signatures.

No news is bad news

Independent news outlets like ours – reporting for the community without rich backers – are under threat of closure, turning British towns into news deserts.

The audiences they serve know less, understand less, and can do less.

If our coverage has helped you understand our community a little bit better, please consider supporting us with a monthly, yearly or one-off donation.

Choose the news. Don’t lose the news.

Monthly direct debit

Annual direct debit

£5 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else, £10 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else and a print copy posted to them each month. £50 annual supporters get a digital copy of each month's paper before anyone else.

More information on supporting us monthly or yearly

Khan and Rayner urged to use powers to prevent Spurs building on Whitewebbs Park

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Description

Enfield Council’s planning committee approved the plans last month but both the London mayor and deputy prime minister still hold the power to overturn decision

Councillors representing Whitewebbs have written to both the London mayor and deputy prime minister to request they “call in” Tottenham Hotspur’s plans for a women’s football academy.

For certain types of application Sir Sadiq Khan has the power to review and potentially refuse schemes, even if they have been approved by the relevant borough council’s planning committee – as happened last month with the controversial Whitewebbs Park development.

Because Whitewebbs Park is part of London’s Metropolitan Green Belt, it falls within the mayor’s scope, and three Conservative councillors representing the ward have now written to Khan to urge him to call it in.

The trio – Reece Fox, Hannah Dyson and David Skelton – have also written to Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner, whose Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) also holds the power to review significant planning applications, deemed to have potentially national interest, with a similar request.

The councillors argue that the fencing off of a public park by a private company would set an unwanted precedent in London and beyond.

In their letters to Khan and Rayner, they write: “We believe that the proposal violates the council’s responsibility (in trust) to ensure that the park remains open for all residents, goes against the London Plan in both spirit and letter, and presupposes both the planning inspector’s deliberations about the Enfield Local Plan, as well as the London-wide review of the Green Belt by the mayor.

“Since these proposals were formally announced in 2021, local residents in Enfield have been fighting to stop Enfield Council from selling over half of Whitewebbs Park to Tottenham Hotspur Football Club.

“On every occasion that they have been given an opportunity to voice their opinion, residents have made clear their strong opposition to the development.

“You have the power to protect this park and indeed have the power to announce clear protections for public parks. This is an opportunity to state that parks must remain”preserved for public use. If this can happen to Whitewebbs Park, it can happen anywhere.”

The Dispatch has approached both the mayor’s office at City Hall and MHCLG but both responded to say that they had not yet had a chance to look at the planning application.

A decision from either office may take some time as the details of the final conditions set to be attached to the Tottenham Hotspur planning application – including changes to the access road for the site that the committee requested at last month’s meeting – have yet to be published.

At the meeting, Spurs captain Bethany England, whose £250,000 signing broke the domestic transfer record for women’s football, hailed the women’s academy scheme as a “once-in-a-generation opportunity”.

No news is bad news

Independent news outlets like ours – reporting for the community without rich backers – are under threat of closure, turning British towns into news deserts.

The audiences they serve know less, understand less, and can do less.

If our coverage has helped you understand our community a little bit better, please consider supporting us with a monthly, yearly or one-off donation.

Choose the news. Don’t lose the news.

Monthly direct debit

Annual direct debit

£5 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else, £10 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else and a print copy posted to them each month. £50 annual supporters get a digital copy of each month's paper before anyone else.

More information on supporting us monthly or yearly

Spurs star visits Edmonton primary school

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Description

Midfielder Lucas Bergvall visited Galliard Primary School as part of Tottenham Hotspur’s NextGen programme

Tottenham Hotspur midfielder Lucas Bergvall has visited a primary school in Edmonton to share some of his skills with local children.

The Swedish midfielder dropped in on a session for around 30 children between the ages of ten and eleven at Galliard Primary School as part of the Premier League club’s NextGen programme, delivered by the club’s football development team.

The NexGen programme provides free opportunities for aspiring young players to enhance their skills and confidence based on the “philosophy and coaching methodology” of Tottenham Hotspur, who currently sit 13th in the league table.

The programme, which launched in January 2023, is delivered in some of the areas of greatest socio-economic deprivation in London.

Lucas said: “It was great to see all the kids enjoying the activities at the school. It reminds of my childhood growing up in Sweden, having opportunities to play football with my friends and having fun, learning new stuff every day.”

After the session Galliard pupil Michael, aged ten, said: “I am a massive Spurs fan, so this was a very special day for me. I was so excited when he arrived.”

Donny Campaniello, NextGen co-ordinator at Tottenham Hotspur, said: “It was a pleasure to have Lucas attend the session today and see his commitment to supporting development pathways for aspiring young footballers in our community. He was also able to provide a fascinating insight into his own journey to becoming a professional footballer.

“Our NextGen programme provides all players opportunities to progress into the club’s overarching player development programmes and is a fantastic platform for those who are seeking a clear route into football, whatever their level. Our mission is to support individual players at each step of their football journey.”

Find out more:

Visit tottenhamhotspur.com/the-club/football-development

No news is bad news

Independent news outlets like ours – reporting for the community without rich backers – are under threat of closure, turning British towns into news deserts.

The audiences they serve know less, understand less, and can do less.

If our coverage has helped you understand our community a little bit better, please consider supporting us with a monthly, yearly or one-off donation.

Choose the news. Don’t lose the news.

Monthly direct debit

Annual direct debit

£5 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else, £10 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else and a print copy posted to them each month. £50 annual supporters get a digital copy of each month's paper before anyone else.

More information on supporting us monthly or yearly

Conservatives lodge complaint over planning chair’s Spurs tickets admission

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Description

The Labour committee chair admitted she’d received free Tottenham Hotspur tickets before later voting in support of the club’s Whitewebbs planning application earlier this month, reports James Cracknell

Conservative councillors have lodged official complaints over the planning committee meeting which approved Tottenham Hotspur’s plans for Whitewebbs Park earlier this month, the Dispatch can reveal.

The first complaint by the opposition Tory group centres around planning committee chair Mahym Bedekova’s declaration of receiving a free Spurs match ticket, before the debate on the application began, and then not being prevented by Enfield Council legal officers from voting on it.

In addition, a second complaint concerns the council’s director of leisure and public realm, Alice Davey, being allowed to make a deputation to the committee on the side of Tottenham Hotspur and its controversial application for a women’s and girls’ academy.

Councillors on the committee voted seven-to-four in favour of the plans following the marathon civic centre meeting on Tuesday, 11th February, with the vote falling along party lines.

Mike Rye, a former Conservative council leader and long-time planning committee member, told the Dispatch: “The chair declaring she had taken free Spurs tickets and then there being no challenge [from the council monitoring officer] struck me as utterly bizarre.

“As a [Conservative] group we have made a complaint and that is being investigated.”

Although she did not specify at the meeting how and when she received free Spurs tickets, Cllr Bedekova’s gifts and hospitality register includes a declaration for such a gift dated 2nd November 2021. The Dispatch has asked Cllr Bedekova for clarity on whether this is the same gift she declared at the planning committee meeting and in what context it was offered. Cllr Bedekova has not responded.

Another Labour councillor who received free Spurs match tickets was former leader Nesil Caliskan, who also accepted a lunch meeting with executive chairman Daniel Levy in 2020 – just as the Premier League club was bidding to win the council’s 25-year lease of Whitewebbs Park Golf Course. Cllr Caliskan denied any “bias” towards Spurs as a result of the freebies.

Cllr Rye said: “When I was leader years ago, Daniel Levy invited me to his box [at Spurs] and I said I couldn’t accept when there was a live planning application [for the existing training centre].

“The judgement is, how does it look to the average member of the public? Even if there is nothing wrong, it does not look good and it doesn’t feel right.”

Regarding the deputation made by Alice Davey in support of the Tottenham Hotspur application, Cllr Rye said: “The director of parks offered a resounding endorsement of the application – in my experience this is unheard of. If it was a written submission to say it was supported, that would be fine, but not as part of a delegation to persuade the committee to vote for it.”

The Tory councillor concluded: “I remain concerned about how even handed the council was in dealing with the application, not least because of the declaration of interest by the chair and the lobbying by a senior council officer, alongside the Spurs representation, and on the basis that the [council] planning team seemed very keen that the application was approved.”

Sean Wilkinson, the Friends of Whitewebbs Park chair who also spoke at this month’s planning meeting, said he shared Cllr Rye’s concerns over both the free Spurs tickets and deputation by the council’s leisure boss.

“It seemed to compromise the neutrality and independence of the planning process,” he told the Dispatch. “The planning process should be open and transparent. I was very disappointed by the quality of the discussion that took place and surprised the chair’s admission was deemed to be insignificant.”

Enfield Council has not responded to a request for comment.

No news is bad news

Independent news outlets like ours – reporting for the community without rich backers – are under threat of closure, turning British towns into news deserts.

The audiences they serve know less, understand less, and can do less.

If our coverage has helped you understand our community a little bit better, please consider supporting us with a monthly, yearly or one-off donation.

Choose the news. Don’t lose the news.

Monthly direct debit

Annual direct debit

£5 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else, £10 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else and a print copy posted to them each month. £50 annual supporters get a digital copy of each month's paper before anyone else.

More information on supporting us monthly or yearly

Councillors vote to approve controversial Spurs women’s academy at Whitewebbs Park

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Description

Tottenham Hotspur captain Bethany England helps seal victory for Premier League club at Enfield Civic Centre despite emotional appeals by park users against the plans, reports James Cracknell

Tottenham Hotspur’s contentious plans to fence off part of Whitewebbs Park and build a women’s football academy have been approved by Enfield councillors – following an appeal from a record-breaking striker.

Bethany England, whose £250,000 signing for Spurs in January 2023 broke the domestic transfer record for women’s football, addressed Enfield Civic Centre during a marathon three-hour planning committee meeting on Tuesday night to hail the “once-in-a-generation opportunity” the plans provided.

The meeting ended with councillors voting to approve a Green Belt development which has been vehemently opposed by local residents for several years, with all seven Labour members voting in favour and all four Conservatives against.

However, the vote only came following a concession made by Tottenham Hotspur Football Club (THFC) to allay concerns raised by the committee over the impact a new access road for the academy would have on the park’s ancient woodland.

Following a 15-minute break towards the end of the meeting, during which council planning officers conferred with representatives from THFC, it was confirmed that a condition would be added to the plans banning vehicles from using the new route and instead forcing them to use the existing road leading to the Toby Carvery at Whitewebbs House.

Earlier in the night, during a series of five-minute speeches from people invited to speak either for or against the plans, Bethany had stood up to explain what a difference the new training centre would make. The Spurs captain said: “This facility would provide our professional squad and local women and girls with the same opportunities to succeed as our male counterparts.

“We need this facility to compete with the very best teams […] this is a once in a generation opportunity.”

Bethany, who was part of the England women’s squad crowned champions of Europe three years ago, said that the community football programmes set to be provided as part of the club’s plans for Whitewebbs will be “very important” and would help “inspire and nurture the very best talent”.

She added: “I want to see the next generation of WSL [Women’s Super League] stars coming to Enfield.”

Speakers from two community groups had earlier set out their opposition to the plans with passionate speeches of their own.

Ed Allnutt, from Guardians of Whitewebbs, said his group had identified 13 “major defects” with the THFC proposals, including a lack of wildlife surveys and mitigation for lost trees. “This park is not a column on a spreadsheet, it is a living ecosystem,” Ed said.

“This is inappropriate development which would be built both on Green Belt and on parkland […] if you grant this application you will remove this land from the public, that will likely be lost forever.”

Sean Wilkinson, the chair of the Friends of Whitewebbs Park who last year led an unsuccessful judicial review against the council’s award of a 25-year lease of the former golf course to THFC, also made a deputation to the committee.

“Since the golf course closed in 2021, the area has become open public space,” said Sean. “The council closed the golf course before completing the bidding process, and since then, park usage has grown significantly, with an estimated 1,000 visits per week in winter.

“The high level of public use and support shows that the park and its facilities are not surplus to requirements.”

A total of 16 hectares of the former golf course will be fenced off by THFC, with the rest being managed as woodland and parkland. A new café and toilet facilities will be provided at the southern entrance.

But Sean said the plans would “permanently alter” the character of the park and continued: “The developers claim they will restore the 19th Century parkland, but historical maps and aerial photos show that their plans do not match the park’s original open design and long scenic views. Instead, the development would block open space and limit views.

“Middlesex County Council bought this land for the people of Enfield, recognising it as one of the most beautiful areas in the county. Thousands of people still enjoy it today.”

Both Sean and Ed made reference to the park’s ecological value and the fact that a 2020 review of local sites of importance for nature conservation (Sincs) had failed to assess the wildlife value of Whitewebbs Park.

Sean asked why alternative sites for the football academy and its eleven pitches had not been considered by THFC, including an apparently suitable site on the other side of Whitewebbs Lane.

Three Conservative councillors representing Whitewebbs ward also made deputations to the committee, all in objection to the plans.

David Skelton said: “This is one of the most important decisions that this planning committee will make, because Whitewebbs Park provides real value to people across the borough and the whole city.

“I think it is important the council has admitted that parts of the proposals will be inappropriate.”

Cllr Skelton also suggested that the decision-making process by the council when it initially tendered for a commercial lease of Whitewebbs Park Golf Course in 2019 appeared to be “pre-determined” in favour of THFC. He added: “The proposals represent permanent loss of public access and open space.”

Fellow Tory councillors Reece Fox and Hannah Dyson echoed these comments, with Cllr Fox claiming the consultation on the plans had been inadequate and that he had “rarely come across one issue where people are so united”. Cllr Dyson added: “It is a community park for everyone to enjoy and should remain open to everyone.”

The speeches from objectors were followed by a series of speeches in support of the plans, including the one from Bethany England.

In addition to the Spurs women’s captain, THFC executive director Donna Cullen defended the plans for Whitwebbs, which will be joined to the club’s existing men’s training centre via a new pathway. “We have been a good neighbour for Enfield for many years,” said Donna.

“Our men’s training centre is right next door and is acknowledged as one of the best in the world. We show immense responsibility for the environment, most of the time exceeding what we are expected to do.

“We are part of the Enfield community. This is our home and we work here every day.”

Donna reeled off a series of figures, including £2.3million invested in local education to date with 80,000 hours of activities provided at 75 different schools.

The ten-year community outreach programme proposed as part of the new plans include a further 36,700 hours of football activities, with a commitment to reach deprived parts of the borough.

Alice Davey, director of leisure and public realm at Enfield Council, also spoke in favour of the plans, explaining that THFC was proposing facilities that the council would not be able to provide locally itself and that encouraging local girls to continue playing sport as teenagers was a key priority.

“We understand the importance of working in partnership and creating opportunities for all our residents,” said Alice.

“The council shouldn’t, and can’t, deliver everything [on its own]. We support the change at this site from a very limited participation, of golf, to intensive use of football.”

Local residents watching on from the public gallery frequently interrupted some of the statements made in support of the plans, however, as tempers frayed. Planning committee chair Mahym Bedekova warned them they would be thrown out if they didn’t stop calling out.

Following the deputations, the planning committee’s twelve members began to debate the scheme, with Conservative Michael Rye raising a number of concerns. He first commented that it was “sad that Whitewebbs Park has been left to deteriorate”, with the effect of “making a proposal from a very rich football club seem more attractive”.

Cllr Rye added: “There is a significant loss of open space and open views. It is clear that in terms of the council’s own policies it is in breach, and the case for ‘very special circumstances’ needs to be very well made.”

Kathryn Williams, a planning agent speaking on behalf of the council, had earlier told the committee the “inappropriate” aspects of THFC’s plans were outweighed by six “very special circumstances”, which she summarised as the need for a women’s and girls’ training facility; the lack of alternative sites and benefits of co-location with the men’s site; providing community access to football; environmental and sustainability benefits, including a 30% “biodiversity net gain” through improved habitats and planting of 2,000 new trees; health and social benefits; plus local economic benefits.

Several committee members queried the biodiversity claims, however, including whether this had been measured against the previous well-manicured golf course or the current, wilder state of the park with the council confirming it was the latter.

The Section 106 benefits of the plans, specifically the community education programme, was also questioned, particularly why only a ten-year commitment was being made when the lease to THFC was for 25 years.

Labour member Josh Abey asked if such benefits could be provided without the investment from THFC, but Kathryn responded there was “an issue with the budget” which, she said, also explained the “poor state” of the park.

Lee Chamberlain and Peter Fallart, both Tory members, strongly criticised the plan to provide new road access to Toby Carvery by upgrading an existing footpath running close to Whitewebbs Pond, with the existing road being reserved for use by THFC and local residents. However, these concerns were eventually addressed by the additional condition added as part of the committee’s approval.

Meanwhile, Labour member George Savva spoke passionately in defence of the women’s football academy and even criticised residents’ groups for opposing it. “In 1966 when England won the World Cup, women weren’t even allowed to play football,” said Cllr Savva.

“We want Tottenham Hotspur to put Enfield on the map and for girls to show their talents and maybe one day we will have England stars.

“I don’t know why people are opposed to this.”

Despite the concession on road access, all four Tory members still voted against the plans. Independent councillor Thomas Fawns, currently suspended by the Labour Party, abstained, with the votes from the remaining seven Labour members enough to approve the plans, as per the recommendation by council planning officers.

While the plans will also need to be signed off by London mayor Sir Sadiq Khan, the Greater London Authority did not object to the scheme and seems likely to waive it through.

Once planning permission is officially granted, THFC’s 25-year lease with the council will commence. Construction of the whole complex is expected to take 27 months.

In a statement emailed to the Dispatch following the meeting on Tuesday (11th), council leader Ergin Erbil said: “We believe this project will bring exciting opportunities to Enfield, including job opportunities, apprenticeships, and enhanced sports facilities.

“We know our borough will benefit from a world class football training ground for women’s football, one of the fastest growing sports in the world. We are also pleased to report that the new training grounds will be accessible to youth teams, grassroots football clubs and community groups.”

No news is bad news

Independent news outlets like ours – reporting for the community without rich backers – are under threat of closure, turning British towns into news deserts.

The audiences they serve know less, understand less, and can do less.

If our coverage has helped you understand our community a little bit better, please consider supporting us with a monthly, yearly or one-off donation.

Choose the news. Don’t lose the news.

Monthly direct debit

Annual direct debit

£5 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else, £10 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else and a print copy posted to them each month. £50 annual supporters get a digital copy of each month's paper before anyone else.

More information on supporting us monthly or yearly

Tottenham Hotspur plans for Whitewebbs recommended for approval

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Description

An Enfield Council planning committee meeting will debate the highly controversial plans for a women’s football academy on Whitewebbs Park this Tuesday

Contentious plans by Tottenham Hotspur for a women’s football academy on Whitewebbs Park have been recommended for approval by Enfield Council’s planning department ahead of a committee meeting next week.

Councillors on Enfield’s planning committee are set to meet at Enfield Civic Centre from 7pm on Tuesday (11th) with the future of Whitewebbs still in the balance.

While the council’s planning officials have produced a 126-page report explaining the reasons why they deem that Spurs have demonstrated “very special circumstances” to justify fencing off around half of the former Whitewebbs Park Golf Course for use by its women’s and girls’ team, councillors will make their own judgement following Tuesday night’s debate and may still vote to reject the scheme.

Unusually for planning committees, the meeting will take place within the council chamber itself, likely because a large number of people are expected to attend in the public gallery.

Planning permission remains the final obstacle for Tottenham Hotspur Football Club (THFC) in its goal to take over the former golf course, which lies adjacent to its existing Whitewebbs Lane training centre first opened in 2012.

However, even if councillors vote to approve it on Tuesday, the Greater London Authority will also need to give it a seal of approval.

The Premier League club was selected by Enfield Council in 2021 as the preferred bidders for the golf course following a tendering exercise in 2019. The final decision in 2023 to award a 25-year lease to THFC was later challenged at the High Court in 2024 but the judicial review judge eventually deemed it lawful.

The lease will not be officially signed off by the civic centre, however, before THFC successfully obtain planning permission.

The council’s report on the plans explains that the application site comprises the now-closed 18-hole ‘pay and play’ municipal golf course with “clubhouse, woodland and pasture” plus adjacent land, extending to approximately 53 hectares in total.

It states that the council-owned golf course “had been operating at a financial loss for several years” and, in light of this, the course was closed in 2021. In the four years since, the report explains, “a permitted change of use to open parkland has taken place” and “the site is well used as open space by the local community for recreational purposes”.

The planning application itself is for the provision of a new women’s and girls’ football training complex plus, the report states, “the restoration of the parkland, with enhancements and refurbishments of footpaths” and part demolition of the southern café “to allow for refurbishment works and a new community hub facility, with public realm improvements”.

A “historic carriageway” will also be reinstated to provide new road access to the Toby Carvery at Whitewebbs and there are said to be “other improvements to parking facilities, security and the management of the parkland” proposed, as well as “significant tree planting and enhancement works”.

While the application site measures 53 hectares, the area to be enclosed for the football training facility extends to 16 hectares and there would be 23 hectares of “restoration works to the historic parkland area” with public access. The remaining twelve hectares would be “preserved as woodland and would see a number of enhancements to improve the quality of the woodland”.

Within the fenced training centre boundary, “eleven football pitches and associated infrastructure” would be constructed with the existing northern clubhouse used to provide changing facilities for the players.

Describing responses to the council’s statutory consultation on the plans, the report states there were 296 objections received as well as 41 statements of support.

Among the stakeholder responses was an objection from Woodland Trust “on the basis of loss and deterioration of veteran and notable trees and the potential loss and deterioration of ancient woodland from the proposed development”.

Commenting in response, the council’s tree officer said: “The applicant has demonstrated there will be no loss of veteran trees and that a 15-metre buffer zone will remain to protect the ancient woodland.”

Sport England also submitted an objection over its concerns over the loss of the golf course, although it does support “the opportunity for the local community to have access to an elite training academy that will provide new facilities for women and girl’s professional football”.

In response to Sport England’s objection, the report states: “In officers’ opinion, the application would provide the introduction of a new outdoor elite sports facility, which through the legal obligations commits the applicant to the community and education programmes.”

Meanwhile, the Football Association said it supported Tottenham Hotspur’s plans.

The council report’s conclusion states: “On balance, taking account of the national Green Belt policies, the presumption in favour and the weight to be given to development, it is concluded that the proposed development has demonstrated ‘very special circumstances’ and overall accords with the policies of the NPPF [National Planning Policy Framework] and development plan and other relevant material planning considerations including emerging policy.

“The application is therefore recommended for approval, subject to planning conditions, and contributions and obligations secured via legal agreement to mitigate the impacts of the development.”

The recommended conditions attached to the planning permission would include the training centre’s floodlights being turned off no later than 8.30pm each night and a minimum of 2,000 new trees being planted.

No news is bad news

Independent news outlets like ours – reporting for the community without rich backers – are under threat of closure, turning British towns into news deserts.

The audiences they serve know less, understand less, and can do less.

If our coverage has helped you understand our community a little bit better, please consider supporting us with a monthly, yearly or one-off donation.

Choose the news. Don’t lose the news.

Monthly direct debit

Annual direct debit

£5 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else, £10 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else and a print copy posted to them each month. £50 annual supporters get a digital copy of each month's paper before anyone else.

More information on supporting us monthly or yearly

Wait for appeal go-ahead goes on as Chris Packham slams ‘bonkers’ Spurs plans for Whitewebbs

Submitted by daniel on
Picture
Remote Image
Description

The BBC Springwatch presenter recently criticised Tottenham Hotspur for wanting to build its women’s training academy on the park, reports James Cracknell

The leading campaigner against Tottenham Hotspur’s plans to build a women’s football academy on Whitewebbs Park says he remains hopeful of launching a legal appeal against it – while welcoming recent support from Chris Packham.

Earlier this year Friends of Whitewebbs Park chair Sean Wilkinson led an unsuccessful judicial review against Enfield Council’s decision to lease more than half of the park’s area to the Premier League club, which plans to fence off its north-east corner for use by its women’s and girls’ teams, but his lawyers are currently waiting to hear whether a request for a review of the case via the Court of Appeal will be accepted.

In the meantime, Springwatch presenter and wildlife campaigner Chris Packham has waded into the debate around the future of Whitewebbs – blasting Spurs for what he says are “nonsensical” plans.

Speaking to the Daily Mirror earlier this month, Packham said: “There’ll be no football on a dead planet […] what we are up against is the bloated monster that is the Premier League with its unfortunate economic might. This is another case of David versus Goliath.”

An independent ecological survey conducted last year by chartered biologist Denis Vickers concluded that Whitewebbs was “rich in invertebrates” and was home to eleven species of bats, eight species of butterfly included on the London priority list, was used as a hunting ground by kestrels, and had potential to become a site of importance for nature conservation (Sinc) if properly managed – but that this potential would not be fulfilled with the current plans from Tottenham Hotspur.

The review concluded: “The development of a fenced and significantly relandscaped football training centre is seen as inappropriate and contrary to preserving this exceptional landscape. An aesthetically pleasing landscape is a criterion in Sinc selection and designation.”

In his interview, Packham continued: “We are going to lose so much valuable space for what are essentially football pitches. We are losing that acid rich grassland to a small group of people behind fences who kick a ball around. It’s absolutely nonsensical.

“This is at a time where we are conscious of the fact we need to protect every last square of greenery, particularly in cities where it has multiple values.

“It’s not just about nature conservation, it’s about people’s mental health and access to nature for people who are living in a crowded urban environment. It’s absolutely bonkers and Spurs are totally disconnected from reality.”

Sean has welcomed the comments from Packham and the higher profile it gives to the Save Whitewebbs campaign. Last month, a further £10,000 was raised towards the cost of the appeal against the judicial review verdict, which the Court of Appeal is currently considering.

He told the Dispatch: “We still think we have a strong case and it is a very important point of law which is significant not just for Whitewebbs but all the other open spaces in London.

“That is why we must keep fighting it, and why Chris Packham and CPRE and our solicitors are fighting it.”

Tottenham Hotspur formally submitted its plans for Whitewebbs in April, with the “regionally significant” women’s training academy on the northern half of the former golf course set to take up 18% of the total park area, while an area of “historic parkland” would be created on the southern half. The pitches would be surrounded by a two-metre high fence and natural hedging.

While two of the pitches would have floodlights, the plans state the lights would be switched on for a maximum of twelve hours per week, and while 121 trees would be felled, an additional 3,000 would be planted alongside the creation of “wildflower meadows, bat and bird boxes, and a new biodiversity corridor”.

The 25-year park lease to Spurs, which is worth £2m to the council, will only go ahead if the plans win permission, with a decision expected later this year. The football club was selected by the council as the preferred bidder to take on the lease after a public procurement process conducted in 2019 and 2020, with the Tottenham Hotspur bid said to meet the council’s ambition to “secure the future of the site” because of its “aspirations for enhanced access to nature and improved public facilities”.

Tottenham Hotspur and the council both declined to comment in response to this story.

No news is bad news

Independent news outlets like ours – reporting for the community without rich backers – are under threat of closure, turning British towns into news deserts.

The audiences they serve know less, understand less, and can do less.

If our coverage has helped you understand our community a little bit better, please consider supporting us with a monthly, yearly or one-off donation.

Choose the news. Don’t lose the news.

Monthly direct debit

Annual direct debit

£5 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else, £10 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else and a print copy posted to them each month. £50 annual supporters get a digital copy of each month's paper before anyone else.

More information on supporting us monthly or yearly