The Boy Hotspur

It is no secret that Tottenham Hotspur need to sign a quality striker, and they have identified Fisnik Asllani as a target.

The 23-year-old has performed well for German club Hoffenheim, with 12 goal contributions this season. According to a report from Fichajes, Tottenham are preparing a formal offer for the player, and it remains to be seen whether they can complete the deal.

Spurs could use Fisnik Asllani

Dominic Solanke has a fair share of injury problems, and he has not been prolific either. They need another reliable striker who can find the back of the net fairly regularly. The Kosovan could prove to be the ideal addition.

The striker is reportedly valued at €30 million, and Tottenham have the financial muscle to afford him. He could prove to be an excellent long-term acquisition for them. At 23, he has plenty of room to develop and could grow into a quality player with the right guidance.

Tottenham needs to improve their attacking unit if they want to compete for major trophies. Signing a reliable finisher should be an absolute priority for them. Asllani is highly rated in Germany, and he has a bright future. He has the physicality and technical attributes for English football, and it remains to be seen whether the two clubs can finalise an agreement.

Other clubs keen on Asllani

Chelsea and Aston Villa have also been mentioned as potential destinations. Spurs must act quickly in order to win the race for his signature. The Blues have not been able to score consistently despite spending on two strikers in the summer, and they are now looking to add more depth in that area of the pitch.

Asllani has been described as a “highly talented striker”, and Tottenham should do everything in their power to secure his signature. The opportunity to play in the Premier League will be exciting for the striker as well. It would be a step up in his career, and he would get to test himself at a higher level.

Tottenham are not currently selling Yves Bissouma, but they have been actively trying to offload him in the January 2026 transfer window, and talks are ongoing.

Bissouma’s contract expires in June 2026, and Spurs have an option to extend it by a year if no buyer emerges. The club has been keen to sell him since last summer (and even earlier), largely due to disciplinary issues (including multiple nitrous oxide incidents), limited game time under manager Thomas Frank, injuries, and his low priority in the squad.

Recent developments (as of late January 2026):

Tottenham has given clearance for his sale, even with midfield injuries, as Conor Gallagher has effectively replaced him in certain roles.

Galatasaray have shown strong interest: Their vice president/chairman reportedly flew to London for talks, with proposals around €5m (or a similar low fee) given the short contract remaining. Some

Turkish sources claim the deal is close or advanced.

Other clubs like Nice, Marseille, and possibly others in Europe have been linked, but nothing is confirmed as done.

Manager Thomas Frank recently ruled out further departures in the final days of the window and indicated Bissouma would stay, though this may depend on offers.

Recent performances (post-AFCON and injury return) have shifted some views—he’s played more lately and received praise, reducing urgency to sell immediately, but the club still wants him off the books to avoid losing him for free.

In short, Spurs want to sell him before the window closes (or at least secure a deal), but as of now (January 28, 2026), no transfer has been completed, and he’s still at the club.

When Thomas Frank left for Tottenham Hotspur in June 2025, Brentford supporters expressed deep sadness but gratitude, calling him a “hero,” a “freaking legend,” and someone who brought immense joy. Articles from Brentford fans describe his departure as feeling like a “break-up,” with wishes for his success elsewhere while noting he’ll always be a hero at the club.

How his public image has changed.

Initially, many Spurs fans were optimistic or supportive, seeing him as a stabiliser who could adapt tactics, develop young players, and bring pragmatic success after a turbulent period under previous management.

However, by January 2026, significant discontent has emerged. Spurs fans have booed him after poor results/draws (e.g., against Brentford, Burnley, and others), chanting “Thomas Frank out” or criticising his football as “guano.” Complaints focus on a lack of entertainment, poor attacking output, conservative tactics not suiting a “bigger” club expecting possession/ flair, failure to improve players, and results against lower teams.

Regrettably, the advent of the Internet has led everyone to suddenly feel that they have an audience. Then there’s eye watering ticket prices, so an afternoon at the football has led to much higher expectations. One evident mindset is, if I can’t watch us win, I may as well let loose and protest on the terraces, online or call up a radio station.

The great thing about facts is that they take away emotion and let us focus on reality. My view is that this squad (which finished 17th last term) isn’t good enough.

Statmuse highlights a huge issue, and it isn’t Thomas Frank.

Tottenham has created the third most chances in the division, but has not managed to convert anywhere near enough of them.

Injuries

James Maddison and Dejan Kulusevski have missed significant (or all) league minutes due to long-term injuries like ACL issues. These absences have robbed the team of progressive passing and incision in midfield/attack. Without them, younger or alternative options (e.g., Bergvall, Gray, or Sarr) provide ball-carrying but lack the same vision and passing quality to unlock defences consistently.

Being overly dependent on alternatives

Heavy reliance on players like Mohammed Kudus for creation adds pressure, while the team lacks leaders and grit in key moments. Poor home record compounds the issue, with draws or losses from dropped points in winnable games. Confidence dips appear evident, leading to wasted chances and no “killer instinct.”

Poor striking options

Big-money moves (e.g., prioritising Solanke) haven’t paid off yet, and existing options (Richarlison, Timo Werner in past roles) aren’t covering the gap. The attack relies heavily on moments rather than consistent output, and there’s no standout No. 9 guaranteeing goals right now.

In short, ENIC scaled back and failed to add enough quality.

Pedro Porro’s commitment to the cause has never been in doubt, but the enthusiasm he radiates for the club seems to be waning. The earlier hype when he signed has cooled into scapegoating during tough spells.

Some fans love his passion and output, while others see him as inconsistent or not suited to being a traditional right-back. Recent injury news has sparked comments about how much the team might miss his energy, even from erstwhile critics.

Many fans point to him as a liability defensively. Comments like “he’s really not a good footballer. Defensively, he’s clueless” or “Porro is a liability” are frequent, especially after poor team results or individual errors that lead to goals.

Some call him overrated, one of the first to sell, or blame him for lapses in concentration and being responsible (directly or indirectly) for concessions

For me, he needs to marry his enthusiasm with the value of his contributions. And certainly, there’s a recognition that he’s been overplayed—playing nearly every minute for long stretches without rotation—which has led to a decline in form.

Many say he was “brilliant” early on, but has struggled more recently due to no rest, with some hoping competition (like from Djed Spence) could reignite him. This again reflects Thomas Frank’s lack of choice.

There have been flashpoints, like after a defeat to Fulham, where Porro clashed with a teammate post-match and criticised some supporters for booing a player, leading to backlash where fans called his behaviour “disgusting” or expressed being “tired” of him. He hit back, defending teammates and questioning disrespectful fans.

Porro polarises Tottenham supporters: valued for his attacking flair and effort, but heavily scrutinised (and often scapegoated) for defensive shortcomings amid the team’s inconsistencies. Sentiment leans more negative in down periods, but with plenty of defenders who argue that context, like tactics, workload, and system, play a big role.

Tottenham Hotspur are interested in signing Sam Johnstone on loan from Wolves this month, as per the BBC.

The 32-year-old has lost his starting spot to Jose Sa and needs to leave Wolves to play more often. He will not want to sit on the bench at this stage of his career. It will be interesting to see if he can secure a move to the North London club until the end of the season.

Wolves director Matt Hobbs has hailed Johnstone as a hugely experienced keeper in the past.

He said: “It’s great for us to have a player with a huge amount of Premier League experience and an international goalkeeper.”

Sam Johnstone to battle Vicario for the starting spot?

He will be expected to compete with Guglielmo Vicario for the starting spot at the English club. The Italian has been quite inconsistent since joining the club, and Spurs need more competition for places. The 32-year-old English goalkeeper could prove to be the ideal acquisition for them in the short term.

He is at the peak of his career, and he will look to hit the ground running at the London club. The opportunity to play for a big club like Tottenham will be exciting for him. He will want to compete in the UEFA Champions League with them. If he manages to impress during his loan spell, he might be able to secure a permanent move.

Johnstone needs a move

Wolves are one of the favourites to go down at the end of the season, and the 32-year-old will not want to compete in the Championship with them. He will look to stay in the top flight, and he will look to prove his quality during the second half of the season, so that he can secure a respectable move in the summer.

Meanwhile, Antonin Kinsky has been linked with a move to West Ham United, and Johnstone could be his replacement at Tottenham.

Tottenham Hotspur are looking to strengthen their defensive unit in the January transfer window and have identified Nathan Collins as a target.

Thomas Frank is pushing to get a deal over the line for a quality central defender before the January window closes.

Frank knows Collins well from their time together at Brentford, and it will be interesting to see if they can get the deal done. The Danish manager signed Collins for Brentford in 2023 and described him as “perfect” at the time.

Thomas Frank on Nathan Collins

Frank said: “His character is really good, and we know that character is everything. He will fit into our culture, I have no doubt about that. I see leadership potential in Nathan. He’s a perfect Brentford player – hungry and ambitious with a desire to learn.”

Collins has proven himself at Brentford, and there is no doubt that he is good enough to play for the North London outfit.

Spurs were linked with the Republic of Ireland international at the start of the season as well, but the move did not materialise back then. According to The Daily Mail, Tottenham are now prepared to revisit the move. It remains to be seen how the situation develops. Thomas Frank is reportedly a huge admirer of the Brentford captain.

Collins could be a quality addition

Radu Dragusin has been linked with a move away from Tottenham, and they will need to replace him properly. Collins could prove to be an upgrade on the Romanian. However, it seems highly unlikely that Brentford will let their captain leave the club in the middle of the season. They are having an impressive season, and they will want to keep their squat intact.

As for Collins, he is likely to be tempted to join a big club and reunite with his former manager. But any move might have to wait until the summer transfer window.

Tottenham have looked vulnerable at the back this season, and they could miss out on European qualification unless they tighten up defensively. It remains to be seen whether they can get their season back on track.

Tottenham Hotspur are interested in signing Hugo Bueno from Wolves.

They were keen on signing Andrew Robertson from Liverpool, but the deal has collapsed. The Scottish international is unlikely to be allowed to leave Liverpool this month. According to TEAMtalk, they have now switched their attention towards the 23-year-old Wolves defender.

Hugo Bueno keen on a move

Bueno is keen to leave the club at the end of the season and compete at the highest level. The move to Tottenham could be exciting for the Spanish defender. Tottenham have been monitoring him closely, and it will be interesting to see if they can get the deal done.

The report further claims that the defender could be available for a fee of around £20 million. Spurs certainly have the financial muscle to pay up, and it remains to be seen whether they can get the deal across the line. They need more depth in the left back department. Ben Davies will be out of contract at the end of the season, and Bueno could be the ideal long-term replacement for him. The 23-year-old is still quite young, and he will improve with coaching experience. Playing alongside quality players at Tottenham could bring out the best in him.

Bueno needs a big move

Meanwhile, Wolves are favourites to go down at the end of the season, and it is no surprise that the key players are already looking to move on. They will not want to compete in the second division of English football.

Bueno has shown his quality in the Premier League with Wolves, and the £20 million investment could prove to be a bargain in the long term.

Spurs have looked vulnerable at the back, and they need to improve in that area of the pitch if they want to fight for trophies.

Tottenham Hotspur (THFC) have officially signed the young Brazilian left-back Souza from Santos in a deal worth around €15 million (£13 million).

The 19-year-old has put pen to paper on a long-term contract (reportedly until 2031) and will wear the number 38 shirt.

This marks Tottenham’s second signing of the January 2026 transfer window under head coach Thomas Frank. Souza joins as a promising, forward-thinking full-back to provide competition and depth for Destiny Udogie on the left side of defence.

Souza came through Santos’ youth academy (joining at age nine in 2016), made his senior debut in early 2025, and quickly established himself with around 38 senior appearances, including strong showings in Brazil’s Serie A despite Santos’ challenges.

He’s a former Brazil U-17 international (with caps at the 2023 U-17 World Cup) and is praised for his technical ability, pace, take-ons, crossing, and attacking contributions from the left flank—though there’s room to grow defensively and physically in the Premier League.

Thomas Frank commented:

“I’m really pleased to add Souza to our squad. He is a talented, promising young full-back who is forward-thinking and technically very good. I’m looking forward to working with him and helping develop that potential, as we believe we have bought one of the brightest left-back talents in the world, who can give us something now but also for the future.”

Souza himself said it’s a “childhood dream” to join Spurs and play in the Premier League, adding:

“This is a big step in my development. The Premier League is very different to what I’m used to in Brazil, and I’m really looking forward to this challenge and to being part of the squad here.”

He’ll also link up with fellow Brazilian Richarlison at the club. Welcome to Spurs, Souza

Ange Postecoglou’s record at Spurs speaks for itself. He joined Tottenham in the summer of 2023 after a trophyless period under previous managers like Mourinho, Conte, and Nuno.

Under Ange, Spurs played an exciting, attacking style of football that fans loved early on. The pinnacle was winning the Europa League in May 2025—the club’s first major trophy since the 2008 League Cup.

Results were mixed. In his first season (2023-24), Tottenham finished 5th in the Premier League, qualifying for Europe. The 2024-25 season saw them hover around mid-table at times, but the Europa triumph overshadowed domestic inconsistencies. There were reports of internal frustrations over squad depth and injuries, but no outright crisis.

Many players, like Micky van de Ven, expressed shock at the sacking, noting it was unexpected given the silverware. It has to be said that a significant portion of fans regretted the decision, with some calling for his reinstatement and criticising the board’s impatience.

One man who shares that vibe is former Spur Teddy Sheringham, who spoke to The Boy Hotspur’s Substack.

Q: Do you think Tottenham may be beginning to regret sacking Ange Postecoglou?

Teddy Sheringham: Listen, I was a big advocate of Ange. I don’t think they should have sacked him. I understood exactly what was going on at the football club. Once it went past February, he didn’t care where they ended up in the Premier League as long as he won something for the football club, and he did that.

I’ve said before that he must have been absolutely devastated after doing what he did at Tottenham. Winning them a trophy when he said he was going to do it, and then, three weeks later, sitting without a job, and looking around the place, going, ‘What have I done wrong?’ He told them what he was going to do, and he did it.

There were so many injuries last year, and he juggled it so that he put all his eggs in one basket, and he came up trumps. Who cares whether you finished ninth, eighth or seventh in the Premier League? I know performances weren’t good in the league, but he got results.

Q: Would you take Ange Postecoglou back at Spurs, should Thomas Frank leave in the future?

Teddy Sheringham: I don’t think you can take him back now. I mean, there was such a funny vibe at the club when he went. I think that would be wrong to do that now. But having said that, I don’t think they should have sacked him when they did.

Daniel Levy and the board reportedly felt a change was needed to “compete on multiple fronts,” citing concerns over league form and long-term sustainability. Postecoglou himself later admitted he sensed it coming before the Europa final, suggesting behind-the-scenes tensions.

This echoes Tottenham’s history of quick managerial turnovers— they’ve cycled through 10 permanent managers since 2008, often chasing short-term fixes without building continuity.

Thomas Frank was brought in from Brentford in summer 2025 as a “progressive” choice, but seven months later, Spurs are in a rut. A recent draw with Burnley has intensified sack rumors for Frank, with the team reportedly mid-table and out of European contention early in the 2025-26 season.

The decision to sack Ange Postecoglou in June 2025 has been one of the most controversial moves in recent Tottenham Hotspur history, and based on the outcomes so far, it looks like a mistake. Let’s break it down step by step, focusing on the facts of his tenure, the context of the dismissal, and what’s happened since.

Postecoglou’s Record at Spurs

Achievements:

He joined Tottenham in the summer of 2023 after a trophyless period under previous managers like Mourinho, Conte, and Nuno. Under Ange, Spurs played an exciting, attacking style of football that fans loved early on. The pinnacle was winning the Europa League in May 2025—the club’s first major trophy since the 2008 League Cup.

This ended a 17-year drought and should have solidified his position.

League Performance: Results were mixed. In his first season (2023-24), Tottenham finished 5th in the Premier League, qualifying for Europe. The 2024-25 season saw them hover around mid-table at times, but the Europa triumph overshadowed domestic inconsistencies. There were reports of internal frustrations over squad depth and injuries, but no outright crisis.

Fan and Player Sentiment: Many players, like Micky van de Ven, expressed shock at the sacking, noting it was unexpected given the silverware.

Why the Sack Happened:

Daniel Levy and the board reportedly felt a change was needed to “compete on multiple fronts,” citing concerns over league form and long-term sustainability.

Postecoglou himself later admitted he sensed it coming before the Europa final, suggesting behind-the-scenes tensions.

This echoes Tottenham’s history of quick managerial turnovers— they’ve cycled through 10 permanent managers since 2008, often chasing short-term fixes without building continuity.

What Happened Next and Why It Suggests They Shouldn’t Have Sacked Him

Replacement Struggles:

Thomas Frank was brought in from Brentford in the summer of 2025 as a “progressive” choice, but seven months later, Spurs are in a rut. A recent draw with Burnley has intensified sack rumours for Frank, with the team reportedly mid-table and out of European contention early in the 2025-26 season.

Fans are frustrated, with some X posts warning that sacking Frank could lead to further instability or even relegation battles.

Hindsight Perspective: Winning a trophy should buy a manager time, especially at a club starved of success. Comparisons to other clubs (e.g., Leicester’s sacking Ranieri after their miracle Premier League win) highlight how such decisions often backfire, leading to regression.

Tottenham’s current woes under Frank make Postecoglou’s era look stronger in retrospect. He delivered results with flair, and the sack feels like a classic Spurs board overreaction.

In short, no, Tottenham shouldn’t have sacked him.